The World Bank is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in Georgia or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The World Bank Country Assessment Survey is meant to give the World Bank's team that works in Georgia, greater insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the World Bank uses to assess the views of its critical stakeholders. With this understanding, the World Bank hopes to develop more effective strategies, outreach and programs that support development in Georgia. The World Bank commissioned an independent firm to oversee the logistics of this effort in Georgia.
The survey was designed to achieve the following objectives:
- Assist the World Bank in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Georgia perceive the Bank;
- Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in Georgia regarding:
· Their views regarding the general environment in Georgia;
· Their overall attitudes toward the World Bank in Georgia;
· Overall impressions of the World Bank's effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Georgia; and
· Perceptions of the World Bank's future role in Georgia.
- Use data to help inform Georgia country team's strategy.
Kind of data
Sample survey data [ssd]
Unit of analysis
Unit of analysis
Stakeholders of the World Bank in Georgia
Producers and sponsors
Public Opinion Research Group
The World Bank Group
In April and May 2013, 276 stakeholders of the World Bank in Georgia were invited to provide their opinions on the Bank's assistance to the country by participating in a country survey. Participants in the survey were drawn from among the office of the President or Prime Minister; the office of a Minister; the office of a Parliamentarian; employees of a ministry, ministerial department, or implementation agency; consultants/contractors working on World Bank-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials or staff; bilateral agencies; multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; NGOs; community-based organizations (CBOs); the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; the judiciary branch; and former officials of the government or a ministry.
A total of 162 stakeholders participated in the country survey (59% response rate).
Dates of collection
Mode of data collection
Mail Questionnaire [mail]
The Questionnaire consists of 8 Sections:
A. General Issues Facing Georgia:
Respondents were asked to indicate whether Georgia is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities, which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty and generating economic growth in Georgia, and how to best achieve "shared prosperity".
B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank:
Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the World Bank, the Bank's effectiveness in Georgia, Bank staff preparedness to help Georgia solve its development challenges, the extent to which the Bank should seek to influence the global development agenda, their agreement with various statements regarding the Bank's work, and the extent to which the Bank is an effective development partner. Respondents were also asked to indicate the sectoral areas on which it would be most productive for the Bank to focus its resources, the Bank's greatest values and greatest weaknesses in its work, the most effective instruments in helping to reduce poverty in Georgia, with which stakeholder groups the Bank should collaborate more, and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts.
C. World Bank Effectiveness and Results:
Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the Bank's work helps achieve development results in Georgia, the extent to which the Bank meets Georgia's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, and the Bank's level of effectiveness across thirty-four development areas, such as economic growth.
D. The World Bank's Knowledge Work and Activities:
Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they consult Bank knowledge work and activities, the areas on which the Bank should focus its knowledge work and activities, and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the Bank's knowledge work and activities, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results and its technical quality.
E. Working with the World Bank:
Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the Bank, such as working with the World Bank increasing Georgia's institutional capacity.
F. The Future Role of the World Bank in Georgia:
Respondents were asked to rate how significant a role the Bank should play in Georgia's development in the near future and to indicate what the Bank should do to make itself of greater value in Georgia.
G. Communication and Information Sharing:
Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the Bank, their Internet access, and their usage and evaluation of the Bank's website. Respondents were asked about their awareness of the Bank's Access to Information policy, past information requests from the Bank, and their level of agreement that they use more data from the World Bank as a result of the Bank's Open Data policy. Respondents were also asked about their level of agreement that they know how to find information from the Bank and that the Bank is responsive to information requests.
H. Background Information:
Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the World Bank, their exposure to the Bank in Georgia, geographic location, and gender.
Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
- the Identification of the Primary Investigator
- the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation)
- the survey reference number
- the source and date of download
Disclaimer and copyrights
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.