The World Bank Working for a World Free of Poverty Microdata Library
  • Data Catalog
  • About
  • Collections
  • Citations
  • Terms of use
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / IMPACT_EVALUATION / KEN_2010_HSNP-FU1_V01_M / variable [F34]
impact_evaluation

Hunger Safety Net Programme Impact Evaluation 2010-2011, First Follow-up Round

Kenya, 2010 - 2011
Get Microdata
Reference ID
KEN_2010_HSNP-FU1_v01_M
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48529/ydfa-8q46
Producer(s)
Oxford Policy Management Limited
Collection(s)
Impact Evaluation Surveys
Metadata
Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jan 14, 2014
Last modified
Jan 14, 2014
Page views
126135
Downloads
12563
  • Study Description
  • Data Description
  • Documentation
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • 3moves
  • 3table
  • 5table
  • 6education
  • 6health
  • 6personnel
  • 6table
  • 7food
  • 7food1
  • 7other
  • 7other1
  • comq_linking_FU
  • comq_weights
  • coversheet
  • section3
  • section4
  • section5
  • section8
  • section9
  • section10
  • section11
  • section99
  • ClusterMaster
  • disaggregation_data
  • hh_weights_original
  • HHAsset
  • HHBeneficiaries
  • HHconsData
  • HHCopingStrategy
  • HHData
  • HHEmploymentProgramme
  • HHFoodAid
  • HHFoodconsData
  • HHImpact
  • HHLivestock
  • HHMember
  • HHMover
  • HHOpMon
  • HHPreambleTracking
  • HHProvidedFor
  • HHSampleRecord
  • HHTransfer
  • HHVisit

What have been the most positive aspects of the Programme? 2nd (IMPadQ01b)

Data file: HHImpact

Overview

Valid: 1402
Invalid: 3144
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 148
End: 150
Width: 3
Range: 1 - 100
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Categories
Value Category Cases
1 Cash allows us to buy a variety of basic items from the shop 154
11%
2 Poor households are able to eat more food 175
12.5%
3 Poor households are able to eat better quality and larger variety of foods 155
11.1%
4 Poor households can afford school fees/uniform and send children to school 131
9.3%
5 Poor households can increase assets 73
5.2%
6 Beneficiaries are more credit worthy 184
13.1%
7 Beneficiaries can borrow more 34
2.4%
8 Can receive money without working for it 73
5.2%
9 Improves cash flow in the household 78
5.6%
10 More products available in local shops 0
0%
11 More business activity – new businesses and increased trading (cash-flow) 7
0.5%
12 Paying off debts 232
16.5%
13 No longer need to borrow 3
0.2%
14 I could start a new business/expand business 4
0.3%
15 Allows to pay for medical expenses/healthcare 38
2.7%
16 Allows to invest in livestock 12
0.9%
17 Beneficiary households are sharing money 5
0.4%
18 New shop(s) available locally 3
0.2%
97 Other, specify 1
0.1%
98 Don’t know 1
0.1%
99 No positive aspects 0
0%
100 N/A 39
2.8%
Sysmiss 3144
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog
The World Bank Working for a World Free of Poverty
  • IBRD IDA IFC MIGA ICSID

© The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved.

This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.