The World Bank Working for a World Free of Poverty Microdata Library
  • Data Catalog
  • About
  • Collections
  • Citations
  • Terms of use
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / IMPACT_EVALUATION / KEN_2010_HSNP-FU1_V01_M / variable [F34]
impact_evaluation

Hunger Safety Net Programme Impact Evaluation 2010-2011, First Follow-up Round

Kenya, 2010 - 2011
Get Microdata
Reference ID
KEN_2010_HSNP-FU1_v01_M
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48529/ydfa-8q46
Producer(s)
Oxford Policy Management Limited
Collection(s)
Impact Evaluation Surveys
Metadata
Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jan 14, 2014
Last modified
Jan 14, 2014
Page views
125968
Downloads
12558
  • Study Description
  • Data Description
  • Documentation
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • 3moves
  • 3table
  • 5table
  • 6education
  • 6health
  • 6personnel
  • 6table
  • 7food
  • 7food1
  • 7other
  • 7other1
  • comq_linking_FU
  • comq_weights
  • coversheet
  • section3
  • section4
  • section5
  • section8
  • section9
  • section10
  • section11
  • section99
  • ClusterMaster
  • disaggregation_data
  • hh_weights_original
  • HHAsset
  • HHBeneficiaries
  • HHconsData
  • HHCopingStrategy
  • HHData
  • HHEmploymentProgramme
  • HHFoodAid
  • HHFoodconsData
  • HHImpact
  • HHLivestock
  • HHMember
  • HHMover
  • HHOpMon
  • HHPreambleTracking
  • HHProvidedFor
  • HHSampleRecord
  • HHTransfer
  • HHVisit

What have been the most positive aspects of the Programme? 3rd (IMPadQ01c)

Data file: HHImpact

Overview

Valid: 1364
Invalid: 3182
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 151
End: 153
Width: 3
Range: 1 - 100
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Categories
Value Category Cases
1 Cash allows us to buy a variety of basic items from the shop 105
7.7%
2 Poor households are able to eat more food 108
7.9%
3 Poor households are able to eat better quality and larger variety of foods 86
6.3%
4 Poor households can afford school fees/uniform and send children to school 81
5.9%
5 Poor households can increase assets 64
4.7%
6 Beneficiaries are more credit worthy 147
10.8%
7 Beneficiaries can borrow more 33
2.4%
8 Can receive money without working for it 56
4.1%
9 Improves cash flow in the household 78
5.7%
10 More products available in local shops 2
0.1%
11 More business activity – new businesses and increased trading (cash-flow) 12
0.9%
12 Paying off debts 226
16.6%
13 No longer need to borrow 10
0.7%
14 I could start a new business/expand business 7
0.5%
15 Allows to pay for medical expenses/healthcare 44
3.2%
16 Allows to invest in livestock 14
1%
17 Beneficiary households are sharing money 8
0.6%
18 New shop(s) available locally 9
0.7%
97 Other, specify 35
2.6%
98 Don’t know 10
0.7%
99 No positive aspects 4
0.3%
100 N/A 225
16.5%
Sysmiss 3182
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog
The World Bank Working for a World Free of Poverty
  • IBRD IDA IFC MIGA ICSID

© The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved.

This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.