The World Bank Working for a World Free of Poverty Microdata Library
  • Data Catalog
  • About
  • Collections
  • Citations
  • Terms of use
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / IMPACT_EVALUATION / KEN_2010_HSNP-FU1_V01_M / variable [F34]
impact_evaluation

Hunger Safety Net Programme Impact Evaluation 2010-2011, First Follow-up Round

Kenya, 2010 - 2011
Get Microdata
Reference ID
KEN_2010_HSNP-FU1_v01_M
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48529/ydfa-8q46
Producer(s)
Oxford Policy Management Limited
Collection(s)
Impact Evaluation Surveys
Metadata
Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jan 14, 2014
Last modified
Jan 14, 2014
Page views
126184
Downloads
12569
  • Study Description
  • Data Description
  • Documentation
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • 3moves
  • 3table
  • 5table
  • 6education
  • 6health
  • 6personnel
  • 6table
  • 7food
  • 7food1
  • 7other
  • 7other1
  • comq_linking_FU
  • comq_weights
  • coversheet
  • section3
  • section4
  • section5
  • section8
  • section9
  • section10
  • section11
  • section99
  • ClusterMaster
  • disaggregation_data
  • hh_weights_original
  • HHAsset
  • HHBeneficiaries
  • HHconsData
  • HHCopingStrategy
  • HHData
  • HHEmploymentProgramme
  • HHFoodAid
  • HHFoodconsData
  • HHImpact
  • HHLivestock
  • HHMember
  • HHMover
  • HHOpMon
  • HHPreambleTracking
  • HHProvidedFor
  • HHSampleRecord
  • HHTransfer
  • HHVisit

What have been the most negative aspects of the Programme? 2nd (IMPadQ02b)

Data file: HHImpact

Overview

Valid: 923
Invalid: 3623
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 192
End: 194
Width: 3
Range: 1 - 100
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Categories
Value Category Cases
1 The paypoint is too far to walk to 41
4.4%
2 The cost of collecting the cash transfer is too high 13
1.4%
3 The cash transfer is too low 205
22.2%
4 Targeting was not fair 28
3%
5 Transfer should be monthly 290
31.4%
6 There is too much pressure from relatives to be given part of the transfer 7
0.8%
7 Programme has caused tensions within beneficiary hhs 0
0%
8 Programme has caused tensions between beneficiary and non-beneficiary hhs 0
0%
9 Programme has caused tensions with other sub-locations 0
0%
10 Programme has disrupted households mobility patterns 1
0.1%
11 Prices have increased locally 14
1.5%
12 Programme has increased dependency 12
1.3%
13 Because of HSNP other programmes have ended in the area 0
0%
14 The HSNP money never arrived 0
0%
15 Programme has disrupted traditional livelihoods 0
0%
16 Households now have large debts 8
0.9%
17 Need more information about the programme 10
1.1%
18 We would prefer everyone to benefit because we are all poor 24
2.6%
19 Long time until payment starts 21
2.3%
20 HSNP beneficiaries are not able to benefit from other programmes (eg. Food for work) 1
0.1%
97 Other (specify) 16
1.7%
98 Don’t know 1
0.1%
99 No negative aspects 31
3.4%
100 N/A 200
21.7%
Sysmiss 3623
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog
The World Bank Working for a World Free of Poverty
  • IBRD IDA IFC MIGA ICSID

© The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved.

This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.