The World Bank Working for a World Free of Poverty Microdata Library
  • Data Catalog
  • About
  • Collections
  • Citations
  • Terms of use
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / IMPACT_EVALUATION / KEN_2010_HSNP-FU1_V01_M / variable [F34]
impact_evaluation

Hunger Safety Net Programme Impact Evaluation 2010-2011, First Follow-up Round

Kenya, 2010 - 2011
Get Microdata
Reference ID
KEN_2010_HSNP-FU1_v01_M
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48529/ydfa-8q46
Producer(s)
Oxford Policy Management Limited
Collection(s)
Impact Evaluation Surveys
Metadata
Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jan 14, 2014
Last modified
Jan 14, 2014
Page views
130530
Downloads
12698
  • Study Description
  • Data Description
  • Documentation
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • 3moves
  • 3table
  • 5table
  • 6education
  • 6health
  • 6personnel
  • 6table
  • 7food
  • 7food1
  • 7other
  • 7other1
  • comq_linking_FU
  • comq_weights
  • coversheet
  • section3
  • section4
  • section5
  • section8
  • section9
  • section10
  • section11
  • section99
  • ClusterMaster
  • disaggregation_data
  • hh_weights_original
  • HHAsset
  • HHBeneficiaries
  • HHconsData
  • HHCopingStrategy
  • HHData
  • HHEmploymentProgramme
  • HHFoodAid
  • HHFoodconsData
  • HHImpact
  • HHLivestock
  • HHMember
  • HHMover
  • HHOpMon
  • HHPreambleTracking
  • HHProvidedFor
  • HHSampleRecord
  • HHTransfer
  • HHVisit

Preferred support? 2nd (IMPafQ05b)

Data file: HHImpact

Overview

Valid: 1402
Invalid: 3144
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 240
End: 241
Width: 2
Range: 1 - 99
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Categories
Value Category Cases
1 More security 19
1.4%
2 Greater choice over what food the HH can buy 121
8.6%
3 More freedom to buy a range of different items that the hh needs 231
16.5%
4 Cash available in case of emergency 224
16%
5 Cash can be used for investment in business 35
2.5%
6 Cash can be used for savings and paying back loans 51
3.6%
7 Cash can be used to pay for school fees/uniforms etc 72
5.1%
8 Cash gives access to credit 244
17.4%
9 Prefer to separate decisions around the purchase of food and non-food items 50
3.6%
10 Do not want to be supported 4
0.3%
11 Food cannot be used for wrong purposes 31
2.2%
12 Shops too far (food more useful) 5
0.4%
13 Get food and can still pay for other things (eg. School fees) 53
3.8%
14 Food creates less tension in the community 5
0.4%
15 More reliable 89
6.3%
16 Money can be hidden more easily, so less requests for sharing 3
0.2%
97 Other (specify) 2
0.1%
98 Don’t Know 0
0%
99 N/A 163
11.6%
Sysmiss 3144
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog
The World Bank Working for a World Free of Poverty
  • IBRD IDA IFC MIGA ICSID

© The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved.

This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.