Hunger Safety Net Programme Impact Evaluation 2010-2011, First Follow-up Round
Kenya, 2010 - 2011
Get Microdata
Reference ID
KEN_2010_HSNP-FU1_v01_M
Producer(s)
Oxford Policy Management Limited
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Jan 14, 2014
Last modified
Jan 14, 2014
Page views
126528
Downloads
12584
- Data files
- 3moves
- 3table
- 5table
- 6education
- 6health
- 6personnel
- 6table
- 7food
- 7food1
- 7other
- 7other1
- comq_linking_FU
- comq_weights
- coversheet
- section3
- section4
- section5
- section8
- section9
- section10
- section11
- section99
- ClusterMaster
- disaggregation_data
- hh_weights_original
- HHAsset
- HHBeneficiaries
- HHconsData
- HHCopingStrategy
- HHData
- HHEmploymentProgramme
- HHFoodAid
- HHFoodconsData
- HHImpact
- HHLivestock
- HHMember
- HHMover
- HHOpMon
- HHPreambleTracking
- HHProvidedFor
- HHSampleRecord
- HHTransfer
- HHVisit
What are the most negative aspects of the Programme? 1st (IMPbcQ03a)
Data file: HHImpact
Overview
Valid:
786
Invalid:
3760
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
335
End:
336
Width:
2
Range:
1 - 99
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Targeting was not fair | 171 |
21.8%
|
| 2 | has caused tensions between HHs | 18 |
2.3%
|
| 3 | Programme has caused tensions between beneficiary and non-beneficiary HHs | 6 |
0.8%
|
| 4 | Programme has caused tensions with other sub-locations | 1 |
0.1%
|
| 5 | has disrupted HHs’ mobility patterns | 2 |
0.3%
|
| 6 | Prices have increased locally | 14 |
1.8%
|
| 7 | Programme has increased dependency | 12 |
1.5%
|
| 8 | Because of HSNP other programmes have ended in the area | 0 |
0%
|
| 9 | The HSNP money never arrived | 3 |
0.4%
|
| 10 | Long time until payments start | 24 |
3.1%
|
| 11 | Too few HHs selected | 168 |
21.4%
|
| 12 | Received goody bag | 0 |
0%
|
| 97 | Other (specify) | 5 |
0.6%
|
| 98 | Don't know | 16 |
2%
|
| 99 | No negative aspects | 346 |
44%
|
| Sysmiss | 3760 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.