Enterprise Survey 2013

Georgia, 2012 - 2013

Get Microdata

Reference ID

GEO_2013_ES_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/hzb4-bc48

Producer(s)

World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Collection(s)

Enterprise Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Feb 04, 2014

Last modified

Apr 10, 2014

Page views

40153

Downloads

6217

Private payments/gifts/other benefits to local/regional officials -dire (ECAq44c)

Data file: Georgia-2013-full data

Overview

Valid: 360

Invalid: 0

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 590

End: 591

Width: 2

Range: -9 - 5

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question

It is often said that firms make unofficial payments/gifts, private payments or other benefits to public officials to gain advantages in the drafting of laws, decrees, regulations, and other binding government decisions. To what extent have the following practices had a direct impact on this establishment?
Private payments/gifts or other benefits to local or regional government officials to affect their votes or content of government decrees

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
-9	Don't know	52	14.4%
-8	Refused	0	0%
-7	DOES NOT APPLY	17	4.7%
1	No impact	268	74.4%
2	Minor impact	14	3.9%
3	Moderate impact	4	1.1%
4	Major impact	5	1.4%
5	Decisive impact	0	0%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Interviewer instructions

Sensitive question, no clarification can be offered

Others

Notes

ECAq44c. Private payments/gifts/other benefits to local/regional officials -direct impact

Back to Catalog