Enterprise Survey 2013

Kazakhstan, 2012 - 2013

Get Microdata

Reference ID

KAZ_2013_ES_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/2w96-ty26

Producer(s)

World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Collection(s)

Enterprise Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Apr 09, 2014

Last modified

Apr 09, 2014

Page views

40876

Downloads

6217

Private payments/gifts/other benefits to Parliamentarians - direct impa (ECAq44a)

Data file: Kazakhstan-2013-full data

Overview

Valid: 600

Invalid: 0

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 1067

End: 1068

Width: 2

Range: -9 - 5

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question

It is often said that firms make unofficial payments/gifts, private payments or other benefits to public officials to gain advantages in the drafting of laws, decrees, regulations, and other binding government decisions. To what extent have the following practices had a direct impact on this establishment?
Private payments/gifts or other benefits to Parliamentarians to affect their votes

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
-9	Don't know	50	8.3%
-8	Refused	0	0%
-7	DOES NOT APPLY	74	12.3%
1	No impact	277	46.2%
2	Minor impact	84	14%
3	Moderate impact	72	12%
4	Major impact	30	5%
5	Decisive impact	13	2.2%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Interviewer instructions

Sensitive question, no clarification can be offered

Others

Notes

ECAq44a. Private payments/gifts/other benefits to Parliamentarians - direct impact

Back to Catalog