Enterprise Survey 2013

Moldova, 2012 - 2013

Get Microdata

Reference ID

MDA_2013_ES_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/37tx-eh54

Producer(s)

World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Collection(s)

Enterprise Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Study website

Created on

Apr 10, 2014

Last modified

Apr 10, 2014

Page views

39149

Downloads

5723

Private payments/gifts/other benefits to local/regional officials -dire (ECAq44c)

Data file: Moldova-2013-full data

Overview

Valid: 360

Invalid: 0

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 1088

End: 1089

Width: 2

Range: -9 - 5

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question

It is often said that firms make unofficial payments/gifts, private payments or other benefits to public officials to gain advantages in the drafting of laws, decrees, regulations, and other binding government decisions. To what extent have the following practices had a direct impact on this establishment?
Private payments/gifts or other benefits to local or regional government officials to affect their votes or content of government decrees

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
-9	Don't know	49	13.6%
-8	Refused	0	0%
-7	DOES NOT APPLY	49	13.6%
1	No impact	121	33.6%
2	Minor impact	32	8.9%
3	Moderate impact	44	12.2%
4	Major impact	43	11.9%
5	Decisive impact	22	6.1%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Interviewer instructions

Sensitive question, no clarification can be offered

Others

Notes

ECAq44c. Private payments/gifts/other benefits to local/regional officials -direct impact

Back to Catalog