Enterprise Survey 2013

Romania, 2012 - 2013

Get Microdata

Reference ID

ROU_2013_ES_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/gh1j-2a05

Producer(s)

World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Collection(s)

Enterprise Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Study website

Created on

Jun 17, 2014

Last modified

Jun 17, 2014

Page views

38463

Downloads

5752

Private payments/gifts/other benefits to local/regional officials -dire (ECAq44c)

Data file: romania_2013_full_data

Overview

Valid: 540

Invalid: 0

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 1140

End: 1141

Width: 2

Range: -9 - 5

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question

It is often said that firms make unofficial payments/gifts, private payments or other benefits to public officials to gain advantages in the drafting of laws, decrees, regulations, and other binding government decisions. To what extent have the following practices had a direct impact on this establishment?
Private payments/gifts or other benefits to local or regional government officials to affect their votes or content of government decrees

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
-9	Don't know	21	3.9%
-8	Refused	0	0%
-7	DOES NOT APPLY	105	19.4%
1	No impact	363	67.2%
2	Minor impact	27	5%
3	Moderate impact	8	1.5%
4	Major impact	11	2%
5	Decisive impact	5	0.9%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Interviewer instructions

Sensitive question, no clarification can be offered

Others

Notes

ECAq44c. Private payments/gifts/other benefits to local/regional officials -direct impact

Back to Catalog