STEP Skills Measurement Household Survey 2015-2016 (Wave 3)
Philippines, 2015
Get Microdata
Reference ID
PHL_2015_STEP-HH_v01_M
Producer(s)
The World Bank
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Sep 06, 2018
Last modified
Sep 06, 2018
Page views
112140
Downloads
13570
- Data files
- step_ph_weights_merged_public
Muncipality (munic)
Data file: step_ph_weights_merged_public
Overview
Valid:
3000
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
167
End:
197
Width:
31
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Literal question
Municipality/city
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALABEL (Capital) | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| ANGELES CITY | 30 |
1%
|
|
| ARAYAT | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| BAAO | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| BACOOR | 30 |
1%
|
|
| BAGO CITY | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| BAGUIO CITY | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| BANGA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| BASISTA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| BAUAN | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| BUSTOS | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| BUTUAN CITY (Capital) | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CABANGLASAN | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CABUYAO | 45 |
1.5%
|
|
| CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY (Capital) | 45 |
1.5%
|
|
| CAINTA | 60 |
2%
|
|
| CALOOCAN CITY | 60 |
2%
|
|
| CANDELARIA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CAPAS | 30 |
1%
|
|
| CITY OF ANTIPOLO | 45 |
1.5%
|
|
| CITY OF BINAN | 30 |
1%
|
|
| CITY OF CALAMBA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CITY OF DASMARINAS | 45 |
1.5%
|
|
| CITY OF DIGOS (Capital) | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CITY OF KABANKALAN | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CITY OF LAS PINAS | 45 |
1.5%
|
|
| CITY OF MAKATI | 30 |
1%
|
|
| CITY OF MALABON | 30 |
1%
|
|
| CITY OF MALOLOS (Capital) | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CITY OF MANDALUYONG | 60 |
2%
|
|
| CITY OF MARIKINA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CITY OF MEYCAUAYAN | 30 |
1%
|
|
| CITY OF MUNTINLUPA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CITY OF NAVOTAS | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CITY OF PANABO | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CITY OF PARANAQUE | 45 |
1.5%
|
|
| CITY OF PASIG | 105 |
3.5%
|
|
| CITY OF SAN FERNANDO (capital) | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CITY OF SAN JOSE DEL MONTE | 30 |
1%
|
|
| CITY OF SAN JUAN | 45 |
1.5%
|
|
| CITY OF SANTA ROSA | 30 |
1%
|
|
| CITY OF SANTIAGO | 30 |
1%
|
|
| CITY OF TAGUM (Capital) | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CITY OF TALISAY | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CITY OF TARLAC (Capital) | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CITY OF URDANETA | 30 |
1%
|
|
| CITY OF VALENCIA | 30 |
1%
|
|
| CITY OF VALENZUELA | 75 |
2.5%
|
|
| COMPOSTELA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| CONCEPCION | 30 |
1%
|
|
| COTABATO CITY | 30 |
1%
|
|
| DAVAO CITY | 60 |
2%
|
|
| DIPOLOG CITY (Capital) | 30 |
1%
|
|
| ESPERANZA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| GENERAL SANTOS CITY (DADIANGAS) | 45 |
1.5%
|
|
| GUMACA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| HERMOSA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| ILIGAN CITY | 30 |
1%
|
|
| ILOILO CITY (Capital) | 45 |
1.5%
|
|
| JOSE PANGANIBAN | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| KAWIT | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| KIAMBA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| LA CARLOTA CITY | 30 |
1%
|
|
| LABO | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| LAKE SEBU | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| LEGAZPI CITY (Capital) | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| LIPA CITY | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| LUCENA CITY | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MABALACAT | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MABINI (DO—A ALICIA) | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MAGALANG | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MAGPET | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MALANGAS | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MALITA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MANGALDAN | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MARGOSATUBIG | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MARIVELES | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MASANTOL | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MEXICO | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MOLAVE | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MONKAYO | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MURCIA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| NABUA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| NAGA CITY | 30 |
1%
|
|
| NORZAGARAY | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| ORION | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| PASAY CITY | 60 |
2%
|
|
| PENARANDA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| PILI (Capital) | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| POLOMOLOK | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| PORT AREA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| QUEZON | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| QUEZON CITY | 225 |
7.5%
|
|
| QUIAPO | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| RODRIGUEZ (MONTALBAN) | 30 |
1%
|
|
| SAMPALOC | 30 |
1%
|
|
| SAN MATEO | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| SAN PEDRO | 30 |
1%
|
|
| SAN RAFAEL | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| SANTA ANA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| SANTA CRUZ | 30 |
1%
|
|
| SANTO TOMAS | 30 |
1%
|
|
| SURALLAH | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| TAGO | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| TAGOLOAN | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| TAGUIG CITY | 45 |
1.5%
|
|
| TANAY | 30 |
1%
|
|
| TANZA | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| TAYTAY | 45 |
1.5%
|
|
| TONDO | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| TUGUEGARAO CITY (Capital) | 30 |
1%
|
|
| ZAMBOANGA CITY | 45 |
1.5%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.