ACCESS IT Training Program Impact Evaluation 2011-2014
Nigeria, 2011 - 2014
Get Microdata
Reference ID
NGA_2011-2014_ACCESSIE_v01_M
Producer(s)
Markus Goldstein, Alaka Holla
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Nov 19, 2018
Last modified
Nov 19, 2018
Page views
77213
Downloads
1688
- Data files
- full_dataset_clean_anonymized
State of Birth (StateofBirth_2)
Data file: full_dataset_clean_anonymized
Overview
Valid:
1747
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
12870
End:
12881
Width:
12
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANAMBRA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Abia | 34 |
1.9%
|
|
| Abuja | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Adamawa | 6 |
0.3%
|
|
| Akwa ibom | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Akwa-Ibom | 9 |
0.5%
|
|
| Akwa-Ibon | 12 |
0.7%
|
|
| Anambra | 103 |
5.9%
|
|
| Bauchi | 16 |
0.9%
|
|
| Bayelsa | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| Benue | 17 |
1%
|
|
| Borno | 10 |
0.6%
|
|
| Cross River | 17 |
1%
|
|
| Delta | 49 |
2.8%
|
|
| ENUGU | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Ebonyi | 13 |
0.7%
|
|
| Edo | 57 |
3.3%
|
|
| Ekiti | 12 |
0.7%
|
|
| Enugu | 138 |
7.9%
|
|
| Enugu(FCT) | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Enugu(LAGOS) | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| FCT Abuja | 7 |
0.4%
|
|
| Gombe | 8 |
0.5%
|
|
| Imo | 52 |
3%
|
|
| Imo State | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Italty | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Jigawa | 6 |
0.3%
|
|
| KADUNA | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| Kaduna | 289 |
16.5%
|
|
| Kano | 136 |
7.8%
|
|
| Kastina | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Katsina | 21 |
1.2%
|
|
| Kebbi | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| Kogi | 56 |
3.2%
|
|
| Kwara | 35 |
2%
|
|
| Lago | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Lagos | 359 |
20.5%
|
|
| Laos State | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| London | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Nasarawa | 15 |
0.9%
|
|
| Niger | 24 |
1.4%
|
|
| OGUN | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Ogun | 39 |
2.2%
|
|
| Ogun, Lagos | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Ondo | 24 |
1.4%
|
|
| Osun | 24 |
1.4%
|
|
| Osun(Lagos) | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Oyo | 57 |
3.3%
|
|
| Oyo State | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Plateau | 29 |
1.7%
|
|
| Rivers | 23 |
1.3%
|
|
| Sokoto | 12 |
0.7%
|
|
| Taraba | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| Yobe | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| Zamfara | 8 |
0.5%
|
|
| lagos | 1 |
0.1%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.