National Household Forest Survey 2018-2019
Liberia, 2018 - 2019
Get Microdata
Reference ID
LBR_2018_NHFS_v01_M
Producer(s)
Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Oct 01, 2020
Last modified
Jul 12, 2021
Page views
129848
Downloads
2635
- Data files
- comm_sect1_public.dta
- comm_sect2_public.dta
- comm_sect3_public.dta
- comm_sect4_public.dta
- comm_sect5_public.dta
- comm_sect6a_public.dta
- comm_sect6b_public.dta
- comm_sect7_public.dta
- comm_sect8a_public.dta
- comm_sect8b_public.dta
- comm_sect9a_public.dta
- comm_sect9b_public.dta
- sect1_public.dta
- sect2_public.dta
- sect3_public.dta
- sect4_public.dta
- sect5_public.dta
- sect6_public.dta
- sect7_filter_public.dta
- sect7_public.dta
- sect8_filter_public.dta
- sect8_public.dta
- sect9_public.dta
- sect10_filter_public.dta
- sect10_public.dta
- sect11_public.dta
- sect12_filter_public.dta
- sect12_public.dta
- sect13_filter_public.dta
- sect13_public.dta
- sect14_public.dta
- sect15_public.dta
- sect16a_public.dta
- sect16b_public.dta
- sect17_public.dta
- sect18_public.dta
- sect19_public.dta
- sect20_public.dta
- sect21_public.dta
- Liberia_NHFS_HH_DistanceToForest.dta
- Liberia_NHFS_HH_Income.dta
what were the main forest/wild products used? [product #1] (S19_2_1)
Data file: sect19_public.dta
Overview
Valid:
1170
Invalid:
1803
Minimum:
1
Maximum:
11
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
53
End:
54
Width:
2
Range:
1 - 11
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
2. What were the main forest/wild products used?
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | timber/logs | 233 |
19.9%
|
| 2 | sawn wood | 71 |
6.1%
|
| 3 | poles/fence posts | 450 |
38.5%
|
| 4 | lianas and vines | 6 |
0.5%
|
| 5 | rattan | 58 |
5%
|
| 6 | bamboo | 78 |
6.7%
|
| 7 | frond/thatch | 234 |
20%
|
| 8 | piassava | 8 |
0.7%
|
| 9 | reeds | 5 |
0.4%
|
| 10 | bricks | 21 |
1.8%
|
| 11 | other wood-based products | 6 |
0.5%
|
| Sysmiss | 1803 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Interviewer instructions
ALLOW UP TO 3