South India Community Health Study 2016
India, 2016
Get Microdata
Reference ID
IND_2016_SICHS_v01_M
Producer(s)
Girija Borker
Metadata
Created on
Apr 29, 2025
Last modified
May 15, 2025
Page views
22517
Downloads
1040
- Data files
- mpr_sec_a_edit.dta
- mpr_sec_a_pg1.dta
- mpr_sec_e_comb.dta
- mpr_sec_e_p2.dta
- mpr_sec_s_comb.dta
- spo_sec_b.dta
- houseroster_p2_edit.dta
- houseroster_p2fore3_edit.dta
- houseroster_p2fore10_edit.dta
- fpr_sec_c_p1.dta
- fpr_sec_e_p2.dta
- 2017_11_23_married_couples_pred_income_1871.dta
- 2017_12_07_dowry_income.dta
- completedata_rough_10oct2015.dta
- houseroster_p2.dta
E18. Who chose your son-in-law or daughter-in-law? (E18)
Data file: mpr_sec_e_comb.dta
Overview
Valid:
1032
Invalid:
-
Minimum:
1
Maximum:
88
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
167
End:
168
Width:
2
Range:
1 - 88
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parents/relatives chose, asked son?s/daughter?s opinion | 875 |
84.8%
|
| 2 | Parents/relatives chose and did not ask son?s/daughter?s opinion | 2 |
0.2%
|
| 3 | Son/daughter chose, parents/relatives consented | 115 |
11.1%
|
| 4 | Son/daughter chose, parents/relatives did not consent | 23 |
2.2%
|
| 5 | Son/daughter chose, did not ask parents/relatives | 14 |
1.4%
|
| 6 | Other | 2 |
0.2%
|
| 66 | Not on roster | 0 |
0%
|
| 77 | Not applicable/not available | 0 |
0%
|
| 87 | No preference | 0 |
0%
|
| 88 | Don?t know | 1 |
0.1%
|
| 90 | Since birth | 0 |
0%
|
| 99 | No response/Refuse to answer | 0 |
0%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.