Domestic Tourism Survey 2021
South Africa, 2021 - 2022
Get Microdata
Reference ID
ZAF_2021_DTS_v01_M
Producer(s)
Statistics South Africa
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Aug 12, 2025
Last modified
Aug 12, 2025
Page views
5906
Downloads
476
- Data files
- dts-2021-day-v1
- dts-2021-night-v1
District of destination (Q44DISTRICT)
Data file: dts-2021-night-v1
Overview
Valid:
32629
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Width:
51
Range:
11 - 999
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 11. City of Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality | 96 |
0.3%
|
| 12 | 12. West Coast District Municipality | 70 |
0.2%
|
| 13 | 13. Cape Winelands Municipality | 29 |
0.1%
|
| 14 | 14. Overberg District Municipality | 37 |
0.1%
|
| 15 | 15. Garden Route District Municipality | 62 |
0.2%
|
| 16 | 16. Central Karoo District Municipality | 16 |
0%
|
| 17 | 17. Do not know | 10 |
0%
|
| 18 | 18. Sarah Baartman District Municipality | 29 |
0.1%
|
| 19 | 19. Amatole District Municipality | 55 |
0.2%
|
| 20 | 20. Chris Hani District Municipality | 59 |
0.2%
|
| 21 | 21. Joe Gqabi District Municipality | 13 |
0%
|
| 22 | 22. OR Tambo District Municipality | 68 |
0.2%
|
| 23 | 23. Alfred Nzo District Municipality | 29 |
0.1%
|
| 24 | 24. Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan | 38 |
0.1%
|
| 25 | 25. Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality | 63 |
0.2%
|
| 26 | 26. Do not know | 49 |
0.2%
|
| 27 | 27. John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality | 53 |
0.2%
|
| 28 | 28. Namakwa District Municipality | 7 |
0%
|
| 29 | 29. Pixley Ka Seme District Municipality | 15 |
0%
|
| 30 | 30. ZF Mgcawu District Municipality | 20 |
0.1%
|
| 31 | 31. Frances Baard District Municipality | 54 |
0.2%
|
| 32 | 32. Do not know | 1 |
0%
|
| 33 | 33. Xhariep District Municipality | 10 |
0%
|
| 34 | 34. Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality | 52 |
0.2%
|
| 35 | 35. Lejweleputswa District Municipality | 21 |
0.1%
|
| 36 | 36. Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality | 37 |
0.1%
|
| 37 | 37. Fezile Dabi District Municipality | 19 |
0.1%
|
| 38 | 38. Do not know | 11 |
0%
|
| 39 | 39. Ugu District Municipality | 31 |
0.1%
|
| 40 | 40. uMgungundlovu District Municipality | 20 |
0.1%
|
| 41 | 41. uThukela District Municipality | 13 |
0%
|
| 42 | 42. uMzinyathi District Municipality | 17 |
0.1%
|
| 43 | 43. Amajuba District Municipality | 11 |
0%
|
| 44 | 44. Zululand District Municipality | 48 |
0.1%
|
| 45 | 45. uMkhanyakude District Municipality | 38 |
0.1%
|
| 46 | 46. uThungulu District Municipality | 28 |
0.1%
|
| 47 | 47. iLembe District Municipality | 15 |
0%
|
| 48 | 48. Harry Gwala District Municipality | 8 |
0%
|
| 49 | 49. Ethekwini Metropolitan Municipality | 122 |
0.4%
|
| 50 | 50. Do not know | 19 |
0.1%
|
| 51 | 51. Bojanala District Municipality | 89 |
0.3%
|
| 52 | 52. Ngaka Modiri Molema District Municipality | 34 |
0.1%
|
| 53 | 53. Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati District Municipality | 50 |
0.2%
|
| 54 | 54. Dr Kenneth Kaunda District Municipality | 28 |
0.1%
|
| 55 | 55. Do not know | 28 |
0.1%
|
| 56 | 56. Sedibeng District | 17 |
0.1%
|
| 57 | 57. West Rand District Municipality | 4 |
0%
|
| 58 | 58. Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality | 41 |
0.1%
|
| 59 | 59. City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality | 122 |
0.4%
|
| 60 | 60. City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality | 138 |
0.4%
|
| 61 | 61. Do not know | 25 |
0.1%
|
| 62 | 62. Gert Sibande District Municipality | 44 |
0.1%
|
| 63 | 63. Nkangala District Municipality | 57 |
0.2%
|
| 64 | 64. Ehlanzeni District Municipality | 110 |
0.3%
|
| 65 | 65. Do not know | 34 |
0.1%
|
| 66 | 66. Mopani District Municipality | 66 |
0.2%
|
| 67 | 67. Vhembe District Municipality | 87 |
0.3%
|
| 68 | 68. Capricorn District Municipality | 104 |
0.3%
|
| 69 | 69. Waterberg District Municipality | 61 |
0.2%
|
| 70 | 70. Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality | 85 |
0.3%
|
| 71 | 71. Do not know | 56 |
0.2%
|
| 888 | 888. Not applicable | 43 |
0.1%
|
| 999 | 999. Unspecified | 29913 |
91.7%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.