Why Don’t Jobseekers Search More? Barriers and Returns to Search on a Job Matching Platform 2016-2022
Pakistan, 2016 - 2022
Get Microdata
Reference ID
PAK_2016-2022_BRSJMP_v01_M
Producer(s)
Kate Vyborny, Robert Garlick, Nivedhitha Subramanian, Erica Field
Created on
Jul 13, 2026
Last modified
Jul 13, 2026
Page views
61114
Downloads
106
- Data files
- HHlisting_long_anony
- hhdata_prep_se
- individual_level_analysis
- individual_level_subscriber_analysis
- individual_round_level_analysis
- intmed_prep
- JA_updated
- jaebs_prep
- job_level_analysis_se
- jsfollowup_prep
- JT_followup_survey_rand
- jt_ja_harmonized_JSF_CV_updates
- jt_ja_harmonized_prep_se
- jt_ja_harmonized_updates_prep_se
- JT_JA_screener_appended
- JT_JA_signup_harmonized_se
- JT_noid_duprem
- JT_noid_updated
- JT_rand_preload_10percent_hybridmod
- JTupdates_JA_harmonized
- 20percent_bonuscalls_prep
- 20percent_prep
- 20percent_prep_attempt
- adlisting_prep_se
- all_optout
- CC_jobs_cv_scoring
- cv_tracking_batches
- CV_updates_Highed_attempts
- CV_updates_highed_data
- cv_updates_highed_data_25_Jun_2021
- cv_updates_highed_data_2020_11_30
- CV_updates_Lowed_attempts
- CV_updates_Lowed_FS_attempts
- feedback_joblevel_prep_se
- feedback_matchlevel_prep_se
- firms_prep_se
- FirmSurvey_nodup_anon_se
- FR_jobs_cv_scoring
- FS_adlisting_anon_se
- FS_del_cleaned_unique_jobid
- FS_del_cleaned_unique_memidjobid_anon
- FS_interview_med
- FS_MidlineSurvey_feedback_cleaned
- FS_non_compliance_int_med
- pickup_prep_se
- post_sep2020_call_order
- pre_sep2020_call_order_recovered
- screener_prep_se
- se_matchlevel_latent_interview_probability_variation_v1
- search_work_resp_ac
- triminput
- Updates_survey_var_JT
- match_level_analysis_sensitivity
- match_level_oct2022
- feedback_joblevel_prep_allvars_se
- feedback_matchlevel_prep_allvars_se
- match_level_analysis
- matches_JT_JA_consolidated
- matches_prep_se
- LFS_2018-19
- cv_updates_uniq_ID_list_he_2022_08_11_b5
Manual comment classification code (comments_manual)
Data file: feedback_joblevel_prep_allvars_se
Overview
Valid:
462
Invalid:
684
Minimum:
1
Maximum:
20
Type:
Discrete
Width:
0
Range:
-
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| 1 | Firm did not receive CVs |
| 2 | Vacancy was filled at heads-up |
| 3 | Respondent is not satisfied with the CVs |
| 4 | Respondent gave a followup |
| 5 | Follow up because respondent was not available |
| 6 | Respondent was not approachable bacause of invalid contact details |
| 7 | Respondent selected candidates but no one showed interest |
| 8 | Firm is closed permanently |
| 9 | Requested Cvs again |
| 10 | Respondent is not satisfied with the service |
| 11 | Respondent shortlisted all our candidates but dont know which ones did he call if he called anyone |
| 12 | Respondent is not interested in the service anymore and asked not to call back |
| 13 | Filled the vacancy AND CVs respondent did not receive CVs |
| 14 | Decided not to fill AND respondent did not receive CVs |
| 15 | Temporarily suspended search, plan to resume later |
| 16 | Reviewed CVs but decided not to fill the vacancy |
| 17 | Did not review CVs and decided not to fill the vacancy |
| 19 | Respondent left the firm and other respondent was not reachable |
| 20 | Respondent has reviewed the CVs but Vacancy filled with non-JT |
| 2147483647 | Cannot determine why is the value filtered |
| Sysmiss |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.