PETS - QSDS in Health 2002

Nigeria, 2002

Get Microdata

Reference ID

NGA_2002_PETS_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/6c8a-ec66

Producer(s)

National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA), Nigeria, World Bank

Collection(s)

Service Delivery Facility Surveys Development Research Microdata Fragility, Conflict and Violence

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Study website Interactive tools

Created on

Dec 06, 2011

Last modified

Nov 21, 2013

Page views

251962

Downloads

346074

Description of Other Action That Would be Taken (n4113oth)

Data file: STAFF - Final

Overview

Valid: 22

Invalid: 0

Type: Discrete

Start: 895

End: 945

Width: 51

Range: -

Format: character

Questions and instructions

Literal question

If you knew with certainty that a health care worker in a nearby primary health care centre was engaging in this objectionable behaviour, what would you do first?
Other

Categories

Value	Cases
ADVISE HEALTH WORKER	1	4.5%
APPEAL TO PATIENT	1	4.5%
APPOLOGIZE IF ANY	1	4.5%
APPOLOGIZE TO PATIENT ON WORKER'S BEHALVE	1	4.5%
BRING BEFORE PROFESS	1	4.5%
CALM THE STAFF/REPOR	1	4.5%
FIND THE CAUSE	1	4.5%
First Counsel & later know causes of action	1	4.5%
LOOK AFTER THE PATIE	1	4.5%
NOT APPLICABLE	1	4.5%
Not Applicable	1	4.5%
REPORT TO H.O.D.	1	4.5%
SETTLE THE FIGHT	1	4.5%
STUDY THE SITUATION	1	4.5%
TELL THE WORKER & CORRECT THEM	1	4.5%
TO GIVE THEM WRONG MEDICATION	1	4.5%
TO RETRIEVE THE DRUG	1	4.5%
TRY TO MAKE PEACE	1	4.5%
TRY TO REASON WITH PERSON BUT REPORT IF IT PERSISTS	1	4.5%
TRY TO RESOLVE OR REPORT IF IT PERSISTS	1	4.5%
Talk to health worker involved	1	4.5%
WARN THE STAFF	1	4.5%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Question post text

Thank you for taking your time to answer the questions.

Back to Catalog