Inquerito Demografico e de Saude Reprodutiva 1998
Republic of Cabo Verde, 1998
Get Microdata
Reference ID
CPV_1998_IDSR_v01_M
Producer(s)
Instituto Nacional de Estatistica (INE)
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Feb 03, 2012
Last modified
Jul 08, 2014
Page views
204188
Downloads
4082
- Data files
- cv98f_newvar
- cv98f_pregnancy
- cv98m_newvar
viveu na outra cidadade/vila (especifiqu (p107ct)
Data file: cv98f_pregnancy
Overview
Valid:
2437
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
51
End:
66
Width:
16
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. FATIMA | 13 |
0.5%
|
|
| A.FATIMA | 12 |
0.5%
|
|
| ACHADA ACIMA | 10 |
0.4%
|
|
| ACHADA FATIMA | 16 |
0.7%
|
|
| ACHADA LAZAO | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| ASSOAMADA | 8 |
0.3%
|
|
| ASSOMADA | 99 |
4.1%
|
|
| ASSOMADA. | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| B | 96 |
3.9%
|
|
| BB | 66 |
2.7%
|
|
| BRAVA | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| C.FIGUEIRA | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| CALHETA | 195 |
8%
|
|
| CHA DE IGREJA | 7 |
0.3%
|
|
| COVA DE BARRO | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| COVA FIGUEIRA | 12 |
0.5%
|
|
| CUTELINHO | 10 |
0.4%
|
|
| DAS POMBAS | 10 |
0.4%
|
|
| DE P. DO SOL | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| ESPARGO | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| ESPARGOS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| IGREJA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| LAGOA GIL | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| LAGOGIL | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| LOBITO | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| LUANDA | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| LUANDA~ | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MAIO | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| MOSTEIROS | 28 |
1.1%
|
|
| N SINTRA | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| N. ESPECIFICOU | 7 |
0.3%
|
|
| N. SINTRA | 39 |
1.6%
|
|
| N.SINTRA | 18 |
0.7%
|
|
| NADA DIS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NAO EAPECIFICOU | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| NAO ESPECIFICA | 88 |
3.6%
|
|
| NAO ESPECIFICOU | 103 |
4.2%
|
|
| NOVA CINTRA | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| NOVA NOVA | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| NOVA SINTRA | 32 |
1.3%
|
|
| P. BADEJO | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| P. BAIXO | 33 |
1.4%
|
|
| P. NOVO | 36 |
1.5%
|
|
| P.ACIMA | 8 |
0.3%
|
|
| P.NAO | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| P.NOVO | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| PAUL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PAUTAKET | 1 |
0%
|
|
| POAUL | 8 |
0.3%
|
|
| PONTA ACHADA | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| PONTA DO SOL | 36 |
1.5%
|
|
| PORTO | 15 |
0.6%
|
|
| PORTO BAIXO | 9 |
0.4%
|
|
| PORTO NOVO | 126 |
5.2%
|
|
| R GRANDE | 16 |
0.7%
|
|
| R.GRANDE | 20 |
0.8%
|
|
| RIB. GRANDE | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| RIBEIRA GRANDE | 119 |
4.9%
|
|
| RIO JANEIRO | 1 |
0%
|
|
| S. FILIPE | 7 |
0.3%
|
|
| S.CATARINA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| S.FILIPE | 361 |
14.8%
|
|
| S.NICOLAU | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| SAL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SALINA | 62 |
2.5%
|
|
| SALTOS ACIMA | 8 |
0.3%
|
|
| SANTA CATARINA | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| SANTA CRUZ | 6 |
0.2%
|
|
| SAO FELIPE | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| SAO FILIPE | 13 |
0.5%
|
|
| SINTRA | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| SW.FILIPE | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| TARRAFAL | 530 |
21.7%
|
|
| TARRAFAL~ | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| TARRFAL | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| VILA DAS POMBAS | 46 |
1.9%
|
|
| VILAS DAS POMBAS | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| WOLGRADO | 1 |
0%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.