Enterprise Survey 2009
Côte d'Ivoire, 2008 - 2009
Get Microdata
Reference ID
CIV_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
Producer(s)
World Bank
Collection(s)
Created on
Mar 24, 2011
Last modified
Sep 26, 2013
Page views
32257
Downloads
181
- Data files
- Ivory_Coast_2009_idstd
interviewer comments (a17x)
Data file: Ivory_Coast_2009_idstd
Overview
Valid:
521
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
1056
End:
1135
Width:
80
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Question pretext
INTERVIEWER COMMENTS (Problems occurred/extraordinary circumstances which could influence results)
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accurate figures, good collaboration | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Approximative data | 3 |
0.6%
|
|
| Cooperative respondant but approximative data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Data taken from financial statement | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Data was available in the company | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Difficulties in communicating with the respondant because of the understanding o | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Difficulties to have financial data | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| Difficulty of communication | 3 |
0.6%
|
|
| Difficulty to find the adress but respondant very kind | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Everthing was good | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Everything was ok | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Financial stetements given by calling registered offices a abidjan | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| God reception from the respondant | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Good colaboration | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Good collaboration | 8 |
1.5%
|
|
| Good impression of the respondant | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Good interview | 67 |
12.9%
|
|
| Good interview approximative data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Good interview but the respondant was giving approximative amounts | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Good interview, | 4 |
0.8%
|
|
| Good interview, approximative data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Good interview, hard to have financials data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Good reception | 9 |
1.7%
|
|
| Good reception from the respondant | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| Good reception from the respondant, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Good repection | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| I've been well received, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Informations taked from financial statement | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Interview was a bit in a rush | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Interview was good | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Interview well done | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Interview went straight | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| It was a bit difficult to get certain information, but i waas well received, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Liability of the data because they were taken from th accouncy book | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Missundestanding between the different respondants on the data, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No account for the company | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No accountancy document for the company | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No accountancy for the company | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| No comment | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No obstacle fom the respondant in giving information | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No particular problem | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No problem | 58 |
11.1%
|
|
| No problem at all | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No problem during the interview, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No problem during the interview, the repondant was well informed about his compa | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No problem, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Receptive respondant | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant appreciated the interview, good collaboration | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant available | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant cooperative, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant deid not want to give is turnover | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant did not understand some questions | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant gave answers without any hesitation | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant gave approximative data concerning turnover | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant had difficulties to answer on some questions | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant had no problem in giving the amounts | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant is kind good interview | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant never had accountancy for his company | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant open | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| Respondant very cooperative | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant was a bit in a hurry | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant was available | 3 |
0.6%
|
|
| Respondant was available but did not master the turnover | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant was cooperative | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant was courteous and very reliable because he seemed to master the amoun | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant was estimating the amounts | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant was friendly | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant was kind | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant was open | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant was open and gave data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondant willing to answer any question | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Smiling respondant | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Some difficulties in giving data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Some difficulties in giving the data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Suspiciouse respondant | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Suspiciouse respondant but honest | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The accountancy is well kept despite the fact that the respondant has not been t | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The collabopation was good | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The establishment has no accountancy | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The inter view was very good, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The interview was cut several times because of some riots going on, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The interview was good | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The interview was vrey good but the respondant does not keep any accountancy for | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The interview went on good, the respondant was always referiing to his archives, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The interview< was a bit complicated because the respondant was not cooperative, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The resondant had some difficulties in giving exact amounts | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondant did not want to give his turnover, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondant does not master his activity | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondant is facing many problems of security about his company, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondant looked not very reliable, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondant was giviing some answers on the spot but for the others he was lo | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondant was giving approximative data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondant was hesitating to give permission for the workers+ interview | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondant was interested in participating, hopping that he would receive so | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondant was not giving all information from his computer, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondant was sceptic | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondant was totally available | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Very cooperztive, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Very good interview | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Very good interview good cooperation of the respondant data are very exact | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Very satisfying | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| We've hardly got information, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| approximative data but good interview | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| approximative data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| approximative data, susspisious respondant | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| availabilty of the respondant | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| company created during year 2008 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| credible data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| credible data but respondant afraid | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| data read in the financial statements | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| difficult interview beceause the respondant was illileracy | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| difficulties about getting right financial precisions | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| difficulties to estimate financial data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| difficulties to have financial data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| difficulty of communication | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| difficulty to have financial data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| estinate data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| everything went fine in total, | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| finacial statements not well prepared | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| financial statement well treated instead of the respondant illiteracy | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| financial statement not well prepared | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| firm created during year 2007,hence lack of total annual sales | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| good collaboration | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| good collaboration but approximative data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| good collaboration but because of no accountancy, data estimated | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| good collaboration but respondant didn't know total annual sales of years before | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| good collaboration credible data, good manager | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| good cooperation | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| good cooperation exact data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| good erception | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| good inter view | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| good interview | 61 |
11.7%
|
|
| good interview the compagy exsited less than one year ago | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| good interviw | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| good reception | 24 |
4.6%
|
|
| good reception but the respondant hesitated giving some figures | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| good reception no problem | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| hard to obtain financial data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| information taken from financial statement | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| informations coming straight from the financial statements | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| instead off a long waiting good interview | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| interview interrupted sometimes by clients,good collaboration | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| it was hard to have fianancial data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| no accountancy | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| no accountancy but figures are credible | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| no accountancy, approximative data, respondant afraid | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| no difficulty | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| no peoblem | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| no pro | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| no problem | 99 |
19%
|
|
| repondant was available and open | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondant avaible and credible figures | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondant busy | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondant busy but available to answer questions | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondant gave approximative figures he refused to have his workers interviewe | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondant gave all the informations | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondant motivated, they pointeed out corruption | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondant not enthousiastic,difficulties for giving figures | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondant refused to let his employees been interviewed | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondant sympathetic | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondant was busy but he gave with precision all informations needed | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondant was kind | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondant was very suspicious | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| respondent was convincing | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| satisfied | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| satisfying interview | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| suspiciouse respondant | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| sympathetic respondant | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| the interview was fine | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| the respondant is very very kind | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| the respondant was suspicious | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| too many difficulties to have financial data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| very cooperative respondant, data taken from financial statements | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| very good collaboration | 3 |
0.6%
|
|
| very good collaboration, the respondant ask for funds | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| very good cooperation, very modern and professionnal company | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| very good reception | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| very precised data | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| very suspiciuous respondant | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| young company | 1 |
0.2%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.