New Work Opportunities for Women (NOW) Pilot Impact Evaluation 2010-2013
Jordan, 2010 - 2013
Get Microdata
Reference ID
JOR_2010_JNOW_v01_M_v01_A_PUF
Producer(s)
Matthew Groh, Nandini Krishnan, David McKenzie, Tara Vishwanath
Metadata
Created on
Apr 12, 2013
Last modified
Feb 18, 2014
Page views
51961
Downloads
14520
Identification
Survey ID Number
JOR_2010_JNOW_v01_M_v01_A_PUF
Title
New Work Opportunities for Women (NOW) Pilot Impact Evaluation 2010-2013
Country/Economy
| Name | Country code |
|---|---|
| Jordan | JOR |
Study type
Labor Force Survey [hh/lfs]
Abstract
Throughout the Middle East, unemployment rates of educated youth have been persistently high and female labor force participation, low. Researchers from the World Bank studied the impact of a randomized experiment in Jordan designed to assist female community college graduates find employment. One group of graduates was given wage subsidy vouchers that could be redeemed by their employers for up to six months for a value equivalent to the prevailing minimum wage; a second group was invited to attend 45 hours of soft skills training; a third group was offered both interventions; and the fourth group formed the control group.
To conduct the study, researchers chose eight public community colleges with the largest female enrolment numbers. Four colleges were in Central Jordan (Amman University College, Princess Alia University College, Al-Salt College, Zarqa University College) and four in Northern and Southern Jordan (Al-Huson University College for Engineering, Irbid University College, Ajloun University College, and Al-Karak University College).
Four individual level survey questionnaires were administered during the impact evaluation study. The baseline survey was conducted in July 2010, the midline - in April 2011, the first endline was carried out in December 2011, and the second endline - in January 2013.
To conduct the study, researchers chose eight public community colleges with the largest female enrolment numbers. Four colleges were in Central Jordan (Amman University College, Princess Alia University College, Al-Salt College, Zarqa University College) and four in Northern and Southern Jordan (Al-Huson University College for Engineering, Irbid University College, Ajloun University College, and Al-Karak University College).
Four individual level survey questionnaires were administered during the impact evaluation study. The baseline survey was conducted in July 2010, the midline - in April 2011, the first endline was carried out in December 2011, and the second endline - in January 2013.
Kind of Data
Sample survey data [ssd]
Unit of Analysis
Female community colleges graduates from the class of 2010.
Version
Version Description
Jordan NOW 2.1 is an edited, anonymized dataset for public distribution.
The dataset is panel series. It is composed of baseline, midline, endline, and second endline surveys conducted in July 2010, April 2011, December 2011, and January 2013.
The dataset is panel series. It is composed of baseline, midline, endline, and second endline surveys conducted in July 2010, April 2011, December 2011, and January 2013.
Scope
Notes
Treatment effects, employment, wages, labor force participation, informality, marriage, Wasta, education, family background, assets, attitudes and beliefs, mental health, female empowerment.
Coverage
Geographic Coverage
Amman, Salt, Zarqa, Irbid, Ajloun, and Karak.
Universe
Female graduates in 2010 from the eight public community colleges with the largest female enrollment numbers. Enrollment at these colleges comprises over 85% of total female public community college enrollment.
Producers and sponsors
Primary investigators
| Name | Affiliation |
|---|---|
| Matthew Groh | World Bank |
| Nandini Krishnan | World Bank |
| David McKenzie | World Bank, BREAD, CEPR, IZA |
| Tara Vishwanath | World Bank |
Funding Agency/Sponsor
| Name |
|---|
| World Bank |
Sampling
Sampling Procedure
Researchers chose the eight public community colleges with the largest female enrollment numbers, which comprise over 85% of total female public community college enrollment. In July 2010 just before final graduation exams, data collectors conducted baseline surveys for most of the 404 male and all of the 1,776 female second-year students from these eight colleges. In August 2010, the researchers merged the baseline data with administrative data on examination results, which revealed that 324 men and 1,418 women passed their examinations. Of the 1,418 women who passed their examinations, the researchers randomly assigned by computer 1,349 of these graduates to be in the experimental sample. However, two of these graduates were male but incorrectly recorded as female. They were subsequently dropped from the sample.
The experimental sample of 1,347 was stratified into 16 strata and randomly assigned by computer into three treatment groups and a control group. The strata were created based on the following four characteristics: whether or not (1) the community college was in Amman (Amman, Salt, and Zarqa) or outside Amman, (2) an individual's Tawjihi examination score at the end of high school was above the sample median, (3) an individual indicated at baseline that she planned to work full-time and thought it at least somewhat likely that she would have a job within 6 months of graduating, and (4) she is usually permitted to travel to the market alone. Within each of the 16 strata, 22.2% of the students were allocated to receive the wage voucher only, 22.2% allocated to receive the soft skills training only, 22.2% allocated to receive both, and 33.3% allocated to the control group. This resulted in 299 or 300 in each treatment group, and 449 in the control group.
The experimental sample of 1,347 was stratified into 16 strata and randomly assigned by computer into three treatment groups and a control group. The strata were created based on the following four characteristics: whether or not (1) the community college was in Amman (Amman, Salt, and Zarqa) or outside Amman, (2) an individual's Tawjihi examination score at the end of high school was above the sample median, (3) an individual indicated at baseline that she planned to work full-time and thought it at least somewhat likely that she would have a job within 6 months of graduating, and (4) she is usually permitted to travel to the market alone. Within each of the 16 strata, 22.2% of the students were allocated to receive the wage voucher only, 22.2% allocated to receive the soft skills training only, 22.2% allocated to receive both, and 33.3% allocated to the control group. This resulted in 299 or 300 in each treatment group, and 449 in the control group.
Deviations from the Sample Design
The only deviation from the sample design involved dropping two graduates from the sample because they were incorrectly recorded as female.
Response Rate
In the midline, first endline, and second endline surveys, researchers successfully followed up with 92%, 96%, and 92% of graduates in the sample, respectively. In the first and second endline surveys, the team collected a portion of the survey data (3% and 9%, respectively) by proxy through their relatives. This survey experienced very few problems with outright rejections to answer the survey questions although the proxy responses reflect graduates or their families refusing to allow the graduate respond for herself. The vast majority of attrition comes from disconnected cell phones and the inability to completely track individuals down.
The attrition rates are low and slightly vary by treatment status. The wage voucher group has the lowest attrition (3% midline, 1% 1st endline, 4% 2nd endline), which is likely due to the additional information gathered through monitoring the voucher usage. On the other hand, the control group experienced the highest attrition (11% midline, 7% 1st endline, 11% 2nd endline), which is likely because there was no additional contact with the control group outside of the surveys.
The attrition rates are low and slightly vary by treatment status. The wage voucher group has the lowest attrition (3% midline, 1% 1st endline, 4% 2nd endline), which is likely due to the additional information gathered through monitoring the voucher usage. On the other hand, the control group experienced the highest attrition (11% midline, 7% 1st endline, 11% 2nd endline), which is likely because there was no additional contact with the control group outside of the surveys.
Data Collection
Dates of Data Collection
| Start | End | Cycle |
|---|---|---|
| 2010-07 | 2010-07 | Baseline |
| 2011-04 | 2011-04 | Midline |
| 2011-12 | 2011-12 | First Endline |
| 2013-01 | 2013-01 | Second Endline |
Data Collection Mode
Other [oth]
Data Collection Notes
Data collection for the three follow-up surveys was conducted primarily over the phone with the exception of a few interviews done face-to-face.
Data collection for the baseline survey was conducted in a classroom environment by a moderator who guided participants to complete the survey on their own.
Data collection for the baseline survey was conducted in a classroom environment by a moderator who guided participants to complete the survey on their own.
Data Collectors
| Name | Affiliation |
|---|---|
| Dajani Consulting | Private consulting firm |
Questionnaires
Questionnaires
All questionnaires were initially developed in English and subsequently translated into Modern Standard Arabic.
The questionnaire design process was based on standard labor force survey questions, academic literature on well being, mental health, and female empowerment, and inputs from Al Balqa Community Colleges, the Chamber of Commerce, the Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation, the Social Security Corportation, the Department of Statistics, Dajani Consulting, Business Development Center, and local firms.
The questionnaires were piloted and adjusted accordingly in each survey round.
The questionnaire design process was based on standard labor force survey questions, academic literature on well being, mental health, and female empowerment, and inputs from Al Balqa Community Colleges, the Chamber of Commerce, the Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation, the Social Security Corportation, the Department of Statistics, Dajani Consulting, Business Development Center, and local firms.
The questionnaires were piloted and adjusted accordingly in each survey round.
Access policy
Contacts
| Name | Affiliation | |
|---|---|---|
| David McKenzie | World Bank | dmckenzie@worldbank.org |
| Microdata Library | World Bank | microdata@worldbank.org |
Access conditions
Public use files.
Citation requirements
Matthew Groh, Nandini Krishnan, David McKenzie, and Tara Vishwanath, World Bank. Jordan New Work Opportunities for Women Pilot Impact Evaluation (NOW) 2010-2013, Ref. JOR_2010_JNOW_v01_M_v01_A_PUF. Dataset downloaded from [URL] on [date].
Disclaimer and copyrights
Disclaimer
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
Metadata production
DDI Document ID
DDI_JOR_2010_JNOW_v01_M_v01_A_PUF
Producers
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Development Data Group | DECDG | World Bank | Generation of DDI documentation |
Date of Metadata Production
2013-04-09
DDI Document version
- v02 (February 2014)
Two Stata do files - Generate Variables Do File and Data Analysis Do File were added to the study.
- v01 (April 2013)
Two Stata do files - Generate Variables Do File and Data Analysis Do File were added to the study.
- v01 (April 2013)