Enterprise Survey 2009
Estonia, 2008
Get Microdata
Reference ID
EST_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
Producer(s)
World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Collection(s)
Created on
Mar 24, 2011
Last modified
Sep 26, 2013
Page views
28021
Downloads
4049
- Data files
-
Estonia-2009--full
data-
interviewer comments (a17x)
Data file: Estonia-2009--full data-
Overview
Valid:
96
Type:
Discrete
Start:
1255
End:
1334
Width:
80
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Question pretext
INTERVIEWER COMMENTS (Problems occurred/extraordinary circumstances which could influence results)
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| all numbers and data was taken accurately and are correctly calculated | 1 |
1%
|
|
| chief accountant could not respind to all questions, other managers were not ava | 1 |
1%
|
|
| company does not have separate record-keeping for electricity, internet, water s | 1 |
1%
|
|
| cooperative | 1 |
1%
|
|
| could not respond to all questions | 1 |
1%
|
|
| did not disclose numbers | 1 |
1%
|
|
| didn't give exact numbers | 1 |
1%
|
|
| didn't have all data available, had to call and for some data had to give estima | 1 |
1%
|
|
| didn't have all data on hand, company is in reorganization process | 1 |
1%
|
|
| didn't have any problems, numbers directly from reports | 1 |
1%
|
|
| didn't know some numbers, so these were approximate | 1 |
1%
|
|
| didn't understand all questions, could be wrong answers. Some terms were not und | 1 |
1%
|
|
| didn't want to disclose numbers | 1 |
1%
|
|
| don't want to disclose some information | 1 |
1%
|
|
| everything was accurately calculated, everything was wonderful | 1 |
1%
|
|
| everything was quick and understadnable | 1 |
1%
|
|
| everything went fast and pleasant, very good cooperation | 1 |
1%
|
|
| everything went well ans smoothly | 1 |
1%
|
|
| extremely pleasant respondent | 1 |
1%
|
|
| financial data from specialized firm - we use their services | 1 |
1%
|
|
| good and smooth communicator | 1 |
1%
|
|
| good cooperation | 1 |
1%
|
|
| good respondent | 2 |
2.1%
|
|
| had attitude that don't know and don't disclose | 1 |
1%
|
|
| had problems with numbers, because accountant was on vacation | 1 |
1%
|
|
| had problems with understanding questions, translation might not be so good, som | 1 |
1%
|
|
| had some problems with understanding questions, | 1 |
1%
|
|
| in case of some questions, he was not competent to respondand there was noone to | 1 |
1%
|
|
| interview is too long - instead of 1 hour it took 2 hours. During this time the | 1 |
1%
|
|
| made interview with accountant the next day | 1 |
1%
|
|
| manager gave estimates, they use accounting company's services, expenses related | 1 |
1%
|
|
| many answers didn't know and were not answered | 1 |
1%
|
|
| no problems, data accurate | 1 |
1%
|
|
| no problems, data correct. Refused from next wave interview, because questions a | 1 |
1%
|
|
| no problems, only in case of numbers could have made mistakes | 1 |
1%
|
|
| no problems, only was a bit in a hurry | 1 |
1%
|
|
| no problems, the company is in elimination process | 1 |
1%
|
|
| no problems, very good contact | 1 |
1%
|
|
| no, had to specify numbers with accountant, but chief accountant was in a busine | 1 |
1%
|
|
| no, very good respondent | 1 |
1%
|
|
| numbers are accurate | 1 |
1%
|
|
| objective contact | 1 |
1%
|
|
| only accountant was available, we would have needed also manager | 1 |
1%
|
|
| partly accurate, partly approximates | 1 |
1%
|
|
| pelasant, objective | 1 |
1%
|
|
| pleasant meeting, no problems | 1 |
1%
|
|
| questions clarity could be better | 1 |
1%
|
|
| questions should be more Estonian and more explained | 1 |
1%
|
|
| reliable relationship, accountant could not be till the endi... | 1 |
1%
|
|
| respondent didn't see any point of this survey | 1 |
1%
|
|
| respondent said that it was too long | 1 |
1%
|
|
| respondent spent a lot of time finding numbers | 1 |
1%
|
|
| respondent was genuine, outgoing and competent, knew what was saying | 1 |
1%
|
|
| respondent was interested and very positive | 1 |
1%
|
|
| respondent was very busy | 1 |
1%
|
|
| responses could influence, but these are accurate | 1 |
1%
|
|
| some answers were estimates | 1 |
1%
|
|
| some data accurate, some estimations | 2 |
2.1%
|
|
| some data is not completely accurate, would have wanted advance information abou | 1 |
1%
|
|
| some data received by calling different persons | 1 |
1%
|
|
| some numbers are accurate, some approximate | 1 |
1%
|
|
| some numbers are accurate, some estimates, some could not tell, because company | 1 |
1%
|
|
| some numbers are not accurate and approximate | 1 |
1%
|
|
| some numbers are not accurate, but estimates | 1 |
1%
|
|
| some numbers were a bit estimations | 1 |
1%
|
|
| some numbers were checked on a phone, some were estimates | 1 |
1%
|
|
| some numbers were estimations | 1 |
1%
|
|
| some questions were a bit confusing for respondent | 1 |
1%
|
|
| some questions were confusing | 1 |
1%
|
|
| there was no accountant | 1 |
1%
|
|
| there was no accountant available | 1 |
1%
|
|
| too broad choice of questions | 1 |
1%
|
|
| too long | 1 |
1%
|
|
| too many numbers | 1 |
1%
|
|
| very argumentive questions, respondent argued and explained a lot | 1 |
1%
|
|
| very bad | 1 |
1%
|
|
| very good | 7 |
7.3%
|
|
| very good communicator | 1 |
1%
|
|
| very good cooperation | 1 |
1%
|
|
| very good respondent, friendly | 1 |
1%
|
|
| very objective | 1 |
1%
|
|
| very objective and helpful | 1 |
1%
|
|
| very pleasant | 2 |
2.1%
|
|
| was not interested | 1 |
1%
|
|
| went smoothly, there was no problems | 1 |
1%
|
|
| wonderful atmosphere | 1 |
1%
|
|
| wonderful cooperation | 1 |
1%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.