The World Bank is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in West Bank and Gaza or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The World Bank Country Assessment Survey is meant to give the World Bank's team that works in West Bank and Gaza, more in-depth insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the World Bank uses to assess the views of its critical stakeholders. With this understanding, the World Bank hopes to develop more effective strategies, outreach and programs that support development in West Bank and Gaza.
The survey was designed to achieve the following objectives:
- Assist the World Bank in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in West Bank and Gaza perceive the Bank;
- Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in West Bank and Gaza regarding:
· Their views regarding the general environment in West Bank and Gaza;
· Their overall attitudes toward the World Bank in West Bank and Gaza;
· Overall impressions of the World Bank's effectiveness and results, knowledge and research, and communication and information sharing in West Bank and Gaza;
· Perceptions of the World Bank's future role in West Bank and Gaza.
- Use data to help inform the West Bank and Gaza country team's strategy.
Kind of data
Sample survey data [ssd]
Unit of analysis
Stakeholders of the World Bank in West Bank and Gaza
Producers and sponsors
Public Opinion Research Group
The World Bank Group
In March-April 2013, 353 stakeholders of the World Bank in West Bank and Gaza were invited to provide their opinions on the Bank's assistance to the country by participating in a country survey. Participants in the survey were drawn from among the office of the President; the office of the Prime Minister; the office of a Minister; the office of a Parliamentarian; employees of a ministry, ministerial department, or implementation agency; consultants/ contractors working on World Bank-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials or staff; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; NGOs; the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; academia/research institutes/think tanks; and other organizations.
A total of 119 stakeholders participated in the survey (34% response rate).
Dates of collection
Mode of data collection
Mail Questionnaire [mail]
The Questionnaire consists of 8 Sections:
A. General Issues Facing West Bank and Gaza:
Respondents were asked to indicate whether West Bank and Gaza is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities in the country, and which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty and generating economic growth in West Bank and Gaza.
B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank:
Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the World Bank, the Bank's effectiveness in West Bank and Gaza, Bank staff preparedness to help West Bank and Gaza solve its development challenges, their agreement with various statements regarding the Bank's work, and the extent to which the Bank is an effective development partner. Respondents were also asked to indicate the sectoral areas on which it would be most productive for the Bank to focus its resources, the Bank's greatest values and greatest weaknesses in its work, the most effective instruments in helping to reduce poverty in West Bank and Gaza, with which stakeholder groups the Bank should collaborate more, and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts.
C. World Bank Effectiveness and Results:
Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the Bank's work helps achieve development results in West Bank and Gaza, the extent to which the Bank meets West Bank and Gaza's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, and the Bank's level of effectiveness across twenty-six development areas, such as economic growth, job creation and employment, security/stabilization/reconstruction, domestic private sector development and education.
D. The World Bank's Knowledge:
Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they consult Bank knowledge/research, the areas on which the Bank should focus its research efforts, and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the Bank's knowledge/research, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results and its technical quality.
E. Working with the World Bank:
Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the Bank, such as the World Bank's "Safeguard Policy" requirements being reasonable, the Bank imposing reasonable conditions on its lending, disbursing funds promptly, increasing West Bank and Gaza's institutional capacity, and providing effective implementation support.
F. The Future Role of the World Bank in West Bank and Gaza:
Respondents were asked to rate how significant a role the Bank should play in West Bank and Gaza's development in the near future and to indicate what the Bank should do to make itself of greater value.
G. Communication and Information Sharing:
Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the Bank, and their usage and evaluation of the Bank's websites. Respondents were asked about their awareness of the Bank's Access to Information policy, past information requests from the Bank, and their level of agreement that they use more data from the World Bank as a result of the Bank's Open Data policy. Respondents were also asked about their level of agreement that they know how to find information from the Bank and that the Bank is responsive to information requests.
H. Background Information:
Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the World Bank, their exposure to the Bank in West Bank and Gaza, and their geographic location.
Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
- the Identification of the Primary Investigator
- the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation)
- the survey reference number
- the source and date of download
Disclaimer and copyrights
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.