Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | The paypoint is too far to walk to | 55 |
3.9%
|
2 | The cost of collecting the cash transfer is too high | 4 |
0.3%
|
3 | The cash transfer is too low | 481 |
34.3%
|
4 | Targeting was not fair | 36 |
2.6%
|
5 | Transfer should be monthly | 264 |
18.8%
|
6 | There is too much pressure from relatives to be given part of the transfer | 7 |
0.5%
|
7 | Programme has caused tensions within beneficiary hhs | 1 |
0.1%
|
8 | Programme has caused tensions between beneficiary and non-beneficiary hhs | 0 |
0%
|
9 | Programme has caused tensions with other sub-locations | 0 |
0%
|
10 | Programme has disrupted households mobility patterns | 0 |
0%
|
11 | Prices have increased locally | 9 |
0.6%
|
12 | Programme has increased dependency | 11 |
0.8%
|
13 | Because of HSNP other programmes have ended in the area | 0 |
0%
|
14 | The HSNP money never arrived | 0 |
0%
|
15 | Programme has disrupted traditional livelihoods | 0 |
0%
|
16 | Households now have large debts | 9 |
0.6%
|
17 | Need more information about the programme | 7 |
0.5%
|
18 | We would prefer everyone to benefit because we are all poor | 18 |
1.3%
|
19 | Long time until payment starts | 14 |
1%
|
20 | HSNP beneficiaries are not able to benefit from other programmes (eg. Food for work) | 3 |
0.2%
|
97 | Other (specify) | 1 |
0.1%
|
98 | Don’t know | 3 |
0.2%
|
99 | No negative aspects | 479 |
34.2%
|
Sysmiss | 3144 |
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.