Hunger Safety Net Programme Impact Evaluation 2010-2011, First Follow-up Round
Kenya, 2010 - 2011
Get Microdata
Reference ID
KEN_2010_HSNP-FU1_v01_M
Producer(s)
Oxford Policy Management Limited
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Jan 14, 2014
Last modified
Jan 14, 2014
Page views
109572
Downloads
10917
- Data files
- 3moves
- 3table
- 5table
- 6education
- 6health
- 6personnel
- 6table
- 7food
- 7food1
- 7other
- 7other1
- comq_linking_FU
- comq_weights
- coversheet
- section3
- section4
- section5
- section8
- section9
- section10
- section11
- section99
- ClusterMaster
- disaggregation_data
- hh_weights_original
- HHAsset
- HHBeneficiaries
- HHconsData
- HHCopingStrategy
- HHData
- HHEmploymentProgramme
- HHFoodAid
- HHFoodconsData
- HHImpact
- HHLivestock
- HHMember
- HHMover
- HHOpMon
- HHPreambleTracking
- HHProvidedFor
- HHSampleRecord
- HHTransfer
- HHVisit
6.06:Nearest educ fclty- fees (q606)
Data file: 6education
Overview
Valid:
772
Invalid:
698
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
42
End:
46
Width:
5
Range:
0 - 33000
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4 |
0.5%
|
|
| 50 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 60 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 79 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 90 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 98 | dk | 26 |
3.4%
|
| 99 | No Fee | 266 |
34.5%
|
| 100 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 120 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 200 | 4 |
0.5%
|
|
| 250 | 4 |
0.5%
|
|
| 270 | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| 300 | 12 |
1.6%
|
|
| 350 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 360 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 400 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 450 | 7 |
0.9%
|
|
| 500 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 600 | 9 |
1.2%
|
|
| 720 | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| 750 | 9 |
1.2%
|
|
| 800 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 900 | 33 |
4.3%
|
|
| 1000 | 8 |
1%
|
|
| 1200 | 59 |
7.6%
|
|
| 1350 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 1440 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 1500 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 1680 | 6 |
0.8%
|
|
| 1800 | 21 |
2.7%
|
|
| 1900 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 2000 | 6 |
0.8%
|
|
| 2100 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 2400 | 47 |
6.1%
|
|
| 2440 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 2500 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 2680 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 2700 | 6 |
0.8%
|
|
| 2880 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 3000 | 10 |
1.3%
|
|
| 3200 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 3250 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 3300 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 3500 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 3600 | 15 |
1.9%
|
|
| 4000 | 5 |
0.6%
|
|
| 4200 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 4500 | 8 |
1%
|
|
| 4800 | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| 5000 | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| 6000 | 16 |
2.1%
|
|
| 6300 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 7200 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 8000 | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| 9000 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 9500 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 9600 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 10000 | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| 10200 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 11000 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 12000 | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| 13900 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 15000 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 15850 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 16000 | 4 |
0.5%
|
|
| 16200 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 16500 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 16600 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 17000 | 6 |
0.8%
|
|
| 17500 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 18000 | 26 |
3.4%
|
|
| 18500 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 18900 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 19000 | 6 |
0.8%
|
|
| 19300 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 19500 | 6 |
0.8%
|
|
| 19800 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 20000 | 27 |
3.5%
|
|
| 20500 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 20800 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 21000 | 7 |
0.9%
|
|
| 21500 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 21700 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 22000 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 23000 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 23500 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 24000 | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| 24500 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 25000 | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| 26000 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 26400 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 27000 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 30000 | 11 |
1.4%
|
|
| 33000 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| Sysmiss | 698 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.