Recognised Seasonal Employer Program Impact Evaluation 2007-2010

Vanuatu, 2007 - 2010

Get Microdata

Reference ID

VUT_2007_RSEIE_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/xavh-sq13

Producer(s)

David McKenzie

Collection(s)

Impact Evaluation Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Apr 09, 2014

Last modified

Apr 09, 2014

Page views

238450

Downloads

139823

Q2g. Migrant's prestige in community (s11q2g)

Data file: round1HHa

Overview

Valid: 258

Invalid: 198

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 570

End: 570

Width: 1

Range: 1 - 8

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Question pretext

To be asked of household heads and RSE applicants

Literal question

There are a number of factors through which working for a season in New Zealand could have an influence in the daily life of the RSE migrant, his/her family and community. For each of them I would like you to say whether your (or your RSE migrant)'s participation in the programme would be very positive, positive, somewhat negative, or very negative for the following:

- The migrant's prestige in the community

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	1=Very positive	75	29.1%
2	2=Somewhat positive	73	28.3%
3	3=Somewhat negative	57	22.1%
4	4=Very negative	16	6.2%
8	8=No effect	37	14.3%
Sysmiss		198

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Interviewer instructions

To be asked of household heads and RSE applicants

Back to Catalog