Recognised Seasonal Employer Program Impact Evaluation 2007-2010

Vanuatu, 2007 - 2010

Get Microdata

Reference ID

VUT_2007_RSEIE_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/xavh-sq13

Producer(s)

David McKenzie

Collection(s)

Impact Evaluation Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Apr 09, 2014

Last modified

Apr 09, 2014

Page views

224297

Downloads

139420

Q3a. Community wealth (s11q3a)

Data file: round1HHa

Overview

Valid: 257

Invalid: 199

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 572

End: 572

Width: 1

Range: 1 - 8

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Question pretext

To be asked of household heads and RSE applicants

Literal question

There are a number of factors through which working for a season in New Zealand could have an influence in the daily life of the RSE migrant, his/her family and community. For each of them I would like you to say whether your (or your RSE migrant)'s participation in the programme would be very positive, positive, somewhat negative, or very negative for the following:

- Community wealth

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	1=Very positive	85	33.1%
2	2=Somewhat positive	108	42%
3	3=Somewhat negative	30	11.7%
4	4=Very negative	8	3.1%
8	8=No effect	26	10.1%
Sysmiss		199

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Interviewer instructions

To be asked of household heads and RSE applicants

Back to Catalog