Recognised Seasonal Employer Program Impact Evaluation 2007-2010

Vanuatu, 2007 - 2010

Get Microdata

Reference ID

VUT_2007_RSEIE_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/xavh-sq13

Producer(s)

David McKenzie

Collection(s)

Impact Evaluation Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Apr 09, 2014

Last modified

Apr 09, 2014

Page views

243111

Downloads

139931

Q4d. Effect on money amounts used for custom events (s11q4d)

Data file: round2HHa

Overview

Valid: 96

Invalid: 286

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 22

End: 22

Width: 1

Range: 1 - 3

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Question pretext

Answer this section only if your household does not have a seasonal worker in New Zealand and does not have a seasonal worker who has returned

Literal question

How has the involvement of members of your village or community affected the following?
d. The amount of money used for custom events

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	1=More money spent	20	20.8%
2	2=No change	57	59.4%
3	3=Less money spent	19	19.8%
Sysmiss		286

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog