Recognised Seasonal Employer Program Impact Evaluation 2007-2010

Vanuatu, 2007 - 2010

Get Microdata

Reference ID

VUT_2007_RSEIE_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/xavh-sq13

Producer(s)

David McKenzie

Collection(s)

Impact Evaluation Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Apr 09, 2014

Last modified

Apr 09, 2014

Page views

217459

Downloads

139332

Q10a. Community wealth (s11q10a)

Data file: round3HHa

Overview

Valid: 26

Invalid: 362

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 451

End: 451

Width: 1

Range: 1 - 5

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Question pretext

To be answered by the person who is/was head of the household while the worker is/was away

Literal question

There are a number of factors through which the RSE seasonal worker program could have an influence in the daily life of the RSE migrant, his/her family and community. For each of them I would like you to say whether your household's participation in the programme has been very positive, positive, negative or very negative, or had no effect.

- Community wealth

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	1=Very positive	4	15.4%
2	2=Somewhat positive	18	69.2%
3	3=Somewhat negative	1	3.8%
4	4=Very negative	0	0%
5	5=No effect at all	3	11.5%
Sysmiss		362

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog