Enterprise Survey 2013

Armenia, 2012 - 2013

Get Microdata

Reference ID

ARM_2013_ES_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/tbr6-7q27

Producer(s)

World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Collection(s)

Enterprise Surveys Fragility, Conflict and Violence

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Study website

Created on

Jun 17, 2014

Last modified

Jun 17, 2014

Page views

33509

Downloads

5785

Private payments/gifts/other benefits to local/regional officials -dire (ECAq44c)

Data file: armenia_2013_full_data

Overview

Valid: 360

Invalid: 0

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 977

End: 978

Width: 2

Range: -9 - 5

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question

It is often said that firms make unofficial payments/gifts, private payments or other benefits to public officials to gain advantages in the drafting of laws, decrees, regulations, and other binding government decisions. To what extent have the following practices had a direct impact on this establishment?
Private payments/gifts or other benefits to local or regional government officials to affect their votes or content of government decrees

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
-9	Don't know	4	1.1%
-8	Refused	1	0.3%
-7	DOES NOT APPLY	6	1.7%
1	No impact	186	51.7%
2	Minor impact	73	20.3%
3	Moderate impact	71	19.7%
4	Major impact	15	4.2%
5	Decisive impact	4	1.1%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Interviewer instructions

Sensitive question, no clarification can be offered

Others

Notes

ECAq44c. Private payments/gifts/other benefits to local/regional officials -direct impact

Back to Catalog