Enterprise Survey 2013
Armenia, 2012 - 2013
World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Created on
June 17, 2014
Last modified
June 17, 2014
Page views
25462
Download
5133
Documentation in PDF
Study website
Metadata
DDI/XML
JSON
- Data files
- armenia_2013_full_data
Private payments/gifts/other benefits to local/regional officials -dire (ECAq44c)
Data file: armenia_2013_full_data
Overview
Valid:
360
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Width:
2
Range:
-9 - 5
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
It is often said that firms make unofficial payments/gifts, private payments or other benefits to public officials to gain advantages in the drafting of laws, decrees, regulations, and other binding government decisions. To what extent have the following practices had a direct impact on this establishment?
Private payments/gifts or other benefits to local or regional government officials to affect their votes or content of government decrees
Private payments/gifts or other benefits to local or regional government officials to affect their votes or content of government decrees
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -9 | Don't know | 4 |
1.1%
|
| -8 | Refused | 1 |
0.3%
|
| -7 | DOES NOT APPLY | 6 |
1.7%
|
| 1 | No impact | 186 |
51.7%
|
| 2 | Minor impact | 73 |
20.3%
|
| 3 | Moderate impact | 71 |
19.7%
|
| 4 | Major impact | 15 |
4.2%
|
| 5 | Decisive impact | 4 |
1.1%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
var_qstn_ivuinstr
Sensitive question, no clarification can be offered
Others
Notes
ECAq44c. Private payments/gifts/other benefits to local/regional officials -direct impact