WSP Global Scaling Up Rural Sanitation Access (TSSM) Impact Evaluation, Madhya Pradesh State, Baseline and Endline Surveys 2009-2011
India, 2009 - 2011
Get Microdata
Reference ID
IND_2009_WSPIE_v01_M_v01_A_PUF
Producer(s)
Water and Sanitation Program, Network for Engineering and Economics Research and Management
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Jul 24, 2014
Last modified
May 11, 2015
Page views
177718
Downloads
19500
Visit1: Duration (mins) (G00_V1TD)
Data file: HHold_BL_PUF
Overview
Valid:
3880
Invalid:
33
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
428
End:
430
Width:
3
Range:
0 - 270
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 26 |
0.7%
|
|
| 1 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 2 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 3 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 5 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 6 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 9 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 10 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 11 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 12 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 13 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 15 | 6 |
0.2%
|
|
| 20 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 21 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 25 | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| 30 | 17 |
0.4%
|
|
| 35 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 40 | 16 |
0.4%
|
|
| 45 | 21 |
0.5%
|
|
| 49 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 50 | 38 |
1%
|
|
| 55 | 20 |
0.5%
|
|
| 56 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 57 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 58 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 59 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 60 | 561 |
14.5%
|
|
| 61 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 62 | 6 |
0.2%
|
|
| 63 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 64 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 65 | 133 |
3.4%
|
|
| 66 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 67 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 68 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 69 | 6 |
0.2%
|
|
| 70 | 362 |
9.3%
|
|
| 71 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 72 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 73 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 74 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 75 | 232 |
6%
|
|
| 76 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 77 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 78 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 79 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 80 | 295 |
7.6%
|
|
| 81 | 6 |
0.2%
|
|
| 82 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 83 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 84 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 85 | 94 |
2.4%
|
|
| 86 | 8 |
0.2%
|
|
| 87 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 88 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 89 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 90 | 453 |
11.7%
|
|
| 91 | 9 |
0.2%
|
|
| 92 | 7 |
0.2%
|
|
| 93 | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| 94 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 95 | 94 |
2.4%
|
|
| 96 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 98 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 100 | 197 |
5.1%
|
|
| 101 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 103 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 104 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 105 | 100 |
2.6%
|
|
| 106 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 108 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 109 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 110 | 62 |
1.6%
|
|
| 112 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 114 | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| 115 | 24 |
0.6%
|
|
| 116 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 118 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 120 | 413 |
10.6%
|
|
| 121 | 16 |
0.4%
|
|
| 122 | 7 |
0.2%
|
|
| 123 | 12 |
0.3%
|
|
| 124 | 12 |
0.3%
|
|
| 125 | 72 |
1.9%
|
|
| 126 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 127 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 128 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 129 | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| 130 | 139 |
3.6%
|
|
| 131 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 135 | 41 |
1.1%
|
|
| 136 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 137 | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| 138 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 140 | 39 |
1%
|
|
| 141 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 143 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 145 | 9 |
0.2%
|
|
| 146 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 150 | 79 |
2%
|
|
| 152 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 154 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 155 | 7 |
0.2%
|
|
| 157 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 159 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 160 | 11 |
0.3%
|
|
| 164 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 165 | 6 |
0.2%
|
|
| 169 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 170 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 175 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 180 | 19 |
0.5%
|
|
| 183 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 185 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 186 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 190 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 195 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 200 | 10 |
0.3%
|
|
| 202 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 210 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 215 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 220 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 230 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 245 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 270 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Sysmiss | 33 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.