Early Childhood Education Program Impact Evaluation 2012-2014
Mexico, 2012 - 2014
Get Microdata
Reference ID
MEX_2012-2014_ECEPIE_v01_M_v01_A_PUF
Producer(s)
Sergio Cárdenas, David Evans, Peter Holland
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Aug 02, 2016
Last modified
Aug 02, 2016
Page views
32968
Downloads
3947
- Data files
- asq_cuid_hog_completa
- promotora_completa
Municipio (munic)
Data file: asq_cuid_hog_completa
Overview
Valid:
4676
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
77
End:
104
Width:
28
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAMBAY | 145 |
3.1%
|
|
| ALMOLOYA DE JUAREZ | 199 |
4.3%
|
|
| ALTAMIRANO | 39 |
0.8%
|
|
| AMATLAN DE LOS REY | 23 |
0.5%
|
|
| AMATLAN DE LOS REYES | 20 |
0.4%
|
|
| AMEALCO DE BONFIL | 29 |
0.6%
|
|
| ATLIXCO | 40 |
0.9%
|
|
| ATOYAC | 42 |
0.9%
|
|
| Altamirano | 20 |
0.4%
|
|
| Amatlán de los Rey | 19 |
0.4%
|
|
| Amealco de Bonfil | 7 |
0.1%
|
|
| Atlixco | 21 |
0.4%
|
|
| Atoyac | 19 |
0.4%
|
|
| CADEREYTA DE MONTES | 33 |
0.7%
|
|
| CHIAUTLA | 214 |
4.6%
|
|
| CHIETLA | 24 |
0.5%
|
|
| CHIGNAHUAPAN | 29 |
0.6%
|
|
| CHILON | 58 |
1.2%
|
|
| CHIUATLA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COLON | 92 |
2%
|
|
| Cadereyta de Montes | 18 |
0.4%
|
|
| Chietla | 11 |
0.2%
|
|
| Chignahuapan | 14 |
0.3%
|
|
| Chil¾n | 34 |
0.7%
|
|
| Colón | 44 |
0.9%
|
|
| EL MARQUES | 100 |
2.1%
|
|
| ELOXOCHITLAN DE FLORES | 9 |
0.2%
|
|
| ELOXOCHITLAN DE FLORES MAGON | 18 |
0.4%
|
|
| El Marqués | 47 |
1%
|
|
| FORNTERA COMALAPA | 2 |
0%
|
|
| FRONTERA CAMALAPA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FRONTERA COMALAPA | 37 |
0.8%
|
|
| Frontera Comalapa | 11 |
0.2%
|
|
| HUAUCHINANGO | 25 |
0.5%
|
|
| HUEYPOXTLA | 127 |
2.7%
|
|
| HUIMILPAN | 9 |
0.2%
|
|
| HUMILPAN | 7 |
0.1%
|
|
| Huauchinango | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| Huimilpan | 7 |
0.1%
|
|
| IXTALHUACA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| IXTLAHUACA | 156 |
3.3%
|
|
| JALPAN DE SERRA | 15 |
0.3%
|
|
| JIQUIPILCO | 155 |
3.3%
|
|
| JUCHIQUE DE FERRER | 36 |
0.8%
|
|
| Jalpan de Serra | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| Juchique de Ferrer | 19 |
0.4%
|
|
| LA TRINITARIA | 15 |
0.3%
|
|
| LAS MARGARITAS | 37 |
0.8%
|
|
| Las Margaritas | 18 |
0.4%
|
|
| MALTRATA | 71 |
1.5%
|
|
| MARQUEZ DE COMILLA | 12 |
0.3%
|
|
| MARQUEZ DE COMILLAS | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| MARTINEZ DE LA TORRE | 110 |
2.4%
|
|
| MAZATLAN VILLA DE FLORES | 197 |
4.2%
|
|
| MISANTLA | 77 |
1.6%
|
|
| MOTOZINTLA | 72 |
1.5%
|
|
| Maltrata | 35 |
0.7%
|
|
| MarquÚs de Comillas | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| Martínez de la Torre | 40 |
0.9%
|
|
| Misantla | 23 |
0.5%
|
|
| Motozintla | 39 |
0.8%
|
|
| NARANJAL | 26 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOPALUCAN | 26 |
0.6%
|
|
| Naranjal | 13 |
0.3%
|
|
| Nopalucan | 11 |
0.2%
|
|
| OCOSINGO | 27 |
0.6%
|
|
| OTZOLOTEPEC | 111 |
2.4%
|
|
| OXCHUC | 29 |
0.6%
|
|
| Ocosingo | 8 |
0.2%
|
|
| Oxchuc | 27 |
0.6%
|
|
| PANTELHO | 47 |
1%
|
|
| PEDRO ESCOBEDO | 27 |
0.6%
|
|
| PICHUCALCO | 20 |
0.4%
|
|
| PINAL DE AMOLES | 126 |
2.7%
|
|
| Pantelh¾ | 26 |
0.6%
|
|
| Pedro Escobedo | 13 |
0.3%
|
|
| Pichucalco | 9 |
0.2%
|
|
| Pinal de Amoles | 44 |
0.9%
|
|
| QUERETARO | 73 |
1.6%
|
|
| SAN ANDRES PAXTLAN | 29 |
0.6%
|
|
| SAN FELIPE DEL PROGRESO | 187 |
4%
|
|
| SAN JOSE TENANGO | 88 |
1.9%
|
|
| SAN JUAN DEL RIO | 31 |
0.7%
|
|
| SAN SALVADOR EL VERDE | 33 |
0.7%
|
|
| SAN SIMON ZAHUATLAN | 14 |
0.3%
|
|
| SANTA LUCIA MIAHUATAN | 9 |
0.2%
|
|
| SANTA LUCIA MIAHUATLAN | 18 |
0.4%
|
|
| San Juan del Río | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| San Salvador el Verde | 11 |
0.2%
|
|
| TATATILA | 102 |
2.2%
|
|
| TECALI DE HERRERA | 30 |
0.6%
|
|
| TECAMACHALCO | 21 |
0.4%
|
|
| TECOLUTLA | 21 |
0.4%
|
|
| TENANCINGO | 51 |
1.1%
|
|
| TILA | 16 |
0.3%
|
|
| TLAPACOYAN | 28 |
0.6%
|
|
| TOLIMAN | 25 |
0.5%
|
|
| TOLUCA | 239 |
5.1%
|
|
| TUMBALA | 30 |
0.6%
|
|
| Tatatila | 55 |
1.2%
|
|
| Tecali de Herrera | 23 |
0.5%
|
|
| Tecamachalco | 8 |
0.2%
|
|
| Tecolutla | 9 |
0.2%
|
|
| Tila | 7 |
0.1%
|
|
| Tlapacoyan | 14 |
0.3%
|
|
| Tolimán | 7 |
0.1%
|
|
| Tumbalß | 11 |
0.2%
|
|
| XANACATLAN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| XIUTETELCO | 14 |
0.3%
|
|
| XONACATLAN | 43 |
0.9%
|
|
| Xiutetelco | 8 |
0.2%
|
|
| YECUATLA | 23 |
0.5%
|
|
| Yecuatla | 11 |
0.2%
|
|
| ZENTLA | 37 |
0.8%
|
|
| Zentla | 12 |
0.3%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.