Impact of Incentives and Information on Quality and Utilization in Primary Care 2014, Baseline Survey
Philippines, 2014
Get Microdata
Reference ID
PHL_2014_I3QUIPIE-BL_v01_M
Producer(s)
Damien B.C.M da Walque, Taejong Kim, John Basa
Metadata
Created on
Feb 03, 2017
Last modified
Jul 10, 2019
Page views
100483
Downloads
24377
Comment on this survey. (F2)
Data file: C03_noID
Overview
Valid:
197
Type:
Discrete
Start:
1467
End:
1710
Width:
244
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -66 | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| -Improvement of PCB. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| -It's okay. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| At least we have learned that survey exist and will be useful in the next future. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Benefits grants. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| C.A is not around. She's in the meeting. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Comprehensive survey. We are not ready. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Excellent work to identify. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Good because at least you help to evaluate all the quality of services of Philhealth. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Good undertaking to know the performance of the RHU. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Good, at least status of LGU budget on health are reviewed. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Good, in order to check implementation of programs and guidelines. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Having a survey like this is really good because they are really gathering the data onhand. It's good also for us to know the lapses to improve. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Help LGU on Health Care. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| How can this survey convey the message to DOH or national government to increase the budget for LGUs in terms of health. Since we were devolved, there was not much funds to maintain a very good gov't hospital. I had a bad experience in one gove | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I don't have any comment about the survey because it's fine with me. It is only the Philhealth that I have concern with. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I have no comment. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I hope Baco will be included as a pilot area so that benefits would be given specially to the Mangyan Minority. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I think this is revelant for us to further augment the services we provide to the people. A good program as I see it. It gives us a chance to inform the people of what we are doing in terms of public service. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| If for example there is a need to improve something, we should be assisted, and then we should be given the right help if we need it so that the people here will be healthy. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Informative-Comprehensive Survey | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It helps assess the services provided by the RHU. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It helps identify the level of performance of the RHU and the effectivity of the program (PCB1) | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It is good there is a survey so implementation of Philhealth will be improved. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It is necessary for the improvement of the PCB1 services. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It serves as an avenue to voice out concerns. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It should be done yearly, so performance is assessed. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It was good because it make me update my records. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's good so that we can voice out of concerns/status of our province to them. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's good so they will also improve. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's good that Philhealth has this kind of survey. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's good to have a survey like this to know the things that need to improve. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's good to know the real status and situations of LGU so that they can help and improve the services of RHU. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's nice for the national gov't to evaluate different agencies if it's really benefitting the people of the program. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's ok, so that they will know the status of RHU. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's ok. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's okay. | 2 |
1%
|
|
| Its ok . I hope Dumalag will be one of the beneficiary of Philhealth with its succeeding programs. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Its ok. This will help Philhealth to at least know the situation of the LGU. Also mentioned that health personnels have more time in their trainings / seminars than their time in servicing the constituents and yet they have high salaries. Also | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Its okay. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It’s a good service of the government to inform the people involved. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It’s a good survey. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It’s a good thing that this survey is conducted since we are able to know and become aware of Philhealth programs and there's transparency. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| No comment, but it's good to know so that they will know the status of services. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| No comment. | 46 |
23.4%
|
|
| No comment. Only LGU sponsored are existing. No provincial & other sponsorship for beneficiary payments and LGU pays the bulk of the payment contributions of beneficiaries. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| No. | 3 |
1.5%
|
|
| None. | 62 |
31.5%
|
|
| Nothing. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Nothing.. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Ok, at least for transparency purposes. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Ok, but Philhealth should solve the problem being complained by people. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Ok, so they will know their service status. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Ok, the survey is positive. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Ok-objective of the survey will be realized. I hope this survey would reach the top management of Philhealth. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Ok. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Okay. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Open and willing to share all records / data needed. There is transparency to the survey. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| So far so good. As long as we will benefit from this. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Some of questions, particularly those w/ regards to trust fund was not stated in the communication from WB, Philhealth & KDI. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Specific in nature and the purpose is good. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Survey is good so we'll know things we are not aware. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Survey should be done once a year. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Thank you for making me a part of this survey. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Thanks to this survey. I hope that it will correct the sharing scheme of PFP. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The Philhealth capitation was not given to the poor. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The purpose of this survey were very well explained. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The questions are okey and it's good to have a survey like this to improve the services. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The questions are specific. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The survey helps identify the areas of health care where the LGU needs help. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The survey is good because we expect more financial assistance from the national and international governments. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The survey is good for it will provide information from our RHU. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The survey is ok, your welcome. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The survey is okay. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The survey is okay. Maybe after this we can receive benefits. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The survey is very essential to determine whether the implementation of PCB1 is effective or not. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The survey will help assess the performance of the RHU. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| This interview is good because it will help us improve not only the facilities but the entire health program of the entire LGUs, particularly those belonging to the 5th & 6th classes of municipalities. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| This kind of survey is very much welcome because it serves as the evaluation in the implementation of PCB1. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| This survey should inform us the result. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Timely because of the health concerned of the municipality. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We appreciate this kind of survey. This is actually good for us to refresh our minds w/ the figures you are requesting based on our reports. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We are positive about this interview at least we can benefit from the PCB1 package of Philhealth. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We are thankful for comung here at Itbayat and we are able to join the survey. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We hope that through this survey the LCE/LGU will be enlightened in the sharing acheme of the capitation/PCB1. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| What is the primary purpose of this survey? What is really the next move? | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Why is there a need for this survey? | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Yes, so that the Philhealth would know what are the lapses and lackness of the municipality enable to work as w/ the concerns. | 1 |
0.5%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.