Impact of Incentives and Information on Quality and Utilization in Primary Care 2014, Baseline Survey
Philippines, 2014
Get Microdata
Reference ID
PHL_2014_I3QUIPIE-BL_v01_M
Producer(s)
Damien B.C.M da Walque, Taejong Kim, John Basa
Metadata
Created on
Feb 03, 2017
Last modified
Jul 10, 2019
Page views
100745
Downloads
24378
Comment on PCB (P1)
Data file: D04_noID
Overview
Valid:
222
Type:
Discrete
Start:
5860
End:
6103
Width:
244
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A fair distribution on professional fee. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Advantage to our patient specially indigents. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Always available to PCB client, free of charge health services are always available. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Capitation is delayed. Too much paperworks. Thanks to Philhealth for helping the indigent families of the town. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Capitation is super delayed. The sharing scheme guidelines from Philhealth was not followed here in San Isidro. Too much paperworks. Philhealth's job were passed to RHU. Some Philhealth members with ID were not honored in some health facilities | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Capitation to help us. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Considering that there are many of us who have to divide the 5% for the medical staff, we received just a very small amount even though we are the ones who do the hard work like paper works. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Continue conducting the imformation needed of every member of PCB1. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Continue conducting the information needed of every member of PCB1. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Continue serving the people with the health package you offer. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Continue to support our RHU. More trainings to new personnel. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Delayed capitation. Delayed claims & reimbursements. To lessen paperworks. Missing reports. To increase the share of the RHU personnel since we are the one doing the job. Some of the shares were spent elsewhere. RHU should be the one to purcha | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Delayed released of capitation fund; Great help to indigent patient to access quality health care. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Enlightened about the capitation we receive from PhilHealth. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Equipment in Lab (Blood Chemistry). When it comes to capitation facilities must be complete. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Fast reimburstment of check. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Forms/ guidelines must be properly oriented to the PhilHealth circulars. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Free transportation for refferal patients. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Funding should be increased in order to provide more services. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Give all forms/ templates such as annex 2 & a4. Give all details about reports to be submitted in PhilHealth/ Orientation about reports. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Good thing because it helps the less fotunate. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Good, as long as you comply with the paper requirements you have money; Medically secured; Too many paper works | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Guidline on proper sharing of PF- who should just be given. Guidline not followed, not proper sharing. Like in my case, I do all laboratory jobs but I believe I am not compensated properly. I am employed at the District Hospital but it is herei | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Helpful to PhilHealth and Non-PhilHealth member. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Helpful to know what are badly needed by the facility. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Helps a lot of indigent. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Hoping that there will be more services to offer with PCB packages. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| How is that? What is that? (that inpertains to the PCB). | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I am not that familiar with PCB guidelines. I am more oriented with OPB. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I hope PCB1 will continue and expand it's coveraqge, it's a nice program. Unlike OPB, reimbursement are dependent on the families involved. Unlike now, you can have your PFP per services rendered. Please include dental servicxes also for covera | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I hope PhilHealth will ensure proper information dissemination to its member | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I hope the sharing scheme will be inverted (Physician vs Med. Staff). | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I hope we can already receive the capitation for the 3rd quarter of 2013. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I suggest to conduct a reorientation about the PCB1 guidelines all RHU staff should attend. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I wish it should be systemized, with online electronic reporting because the gadget that they gave did not work. They should choose who should be given a PhilHealth Card. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I wish that sharing scheme will be fair. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Increase budget (citizen concern) inform ahead of time, need preparation. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Increase the funds for PFP so that we can upgrade our facility. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It can help lessen the patients financial problems during medical check-ups and consultation. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It can help people. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It can sometimes be very taxing but in a way, rewarding, since they can help a lot of people esp. to the poor. There should be widespread information regarding philhealth programs. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It good because a lot of patients who's indigents have benefited, we also has health providers benefits from it. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It is good to have this. The people are helped but because they are LGU sponsord and are PhilHealth members, they do not go to the WARD when hospitalized. Okay because the benefit goes back to the LGU. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It is of great help to the less fortunate constituents. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It is okay, it helps the poor. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It is very tedious. They have to disseminate information properly. The guidelines are not clear. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It must be PHIC who will determine the sharing shceme like 10% MHO, 10% staff, 20% LGU, 80% RHU. We are following ordinance but we think it's quite unfair for the staff but we could not do anything because it is anchored on the ordinance. We h | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It would be better if they will increase the share of other staff on PCB. "We are not receiving the budget on time." | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It would encourage our constituents seek healthservices in RHU.Easy acces for outpatients consultation. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's good because it is a big help to our indigent patients. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's good for the people especially those people who's in need in Health Care. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's good since we can extend health services to the poor and it helps the different RHU to be better equipped with resources necessary to address comprehensive health services. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's good, nice because we receive something. We have enjoyed our vacation because we have cooperation and supported. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's good. It helps the people. It augments the incom staff. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's ok. Regarding the sharing, only the MHO knows. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's ok. Sometimes patients did not bring their Philhealth ID. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's okay but there's a lot of work. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's okey, and it helps a lot. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| It's okey. No comment. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Its ok except that the survey was too long. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Its very helpful for the patients and for us. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Late capitation, it should be given on time; Too much paper works; Profiling is very difficult; Philhealth professional fee of capitation is being taxed, they should not taxed us. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| MCP and TB DOTS reimburstment are delayed; Capitation is also delayed; Too much paperworks; No orientation on new forms of MCP; We do not know how capitation is calculated; To\hose are double entries in the list of beneficiaries; There are bene | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Make the sharing scheme more equal to the RHU staff. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Masterlist of PCB entitled families must be correctly reviewed before sending. Sharing scheme must be adjusted; bigger portions must go to personnel who actually do the field works and tedious workloads like profiting. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Medical Technologist > I hope they will provide equipments for the laboratory. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Medtech > I hope that they will provide us equipments for the laboratory. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Midwives should be trained with vision screening with acetic acid; updating should be done per localization | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| More advantage than disadvantage because in OPV, list of members are not updated for further improvement of our health facility. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| More comprehensive training for PCB1 and 2 implementation for RHU personnel. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| More constituents are encourage to avail the service of the RHU/ HC. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| More funds fromPhilHealth so that we can buy more supplies and equipment. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| More information dissemination be undertaken. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| More medicine from PhilHealth. We are happy with the capitation. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Need longer time to prepare. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Need more time to prepare; Sharing of PCB | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Needs preparation; Proper communication. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| No Comment | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| No Comment. | 7 |
3.2%
|
|
| No comment | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| No comment (MedTech). | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| No comment. | 17 |
7.7%
|
|
| No problem w/ PCB, I hope we receive enough information. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| No. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| None | 3 |
1.4%
|
|
| None. | 22 |
9.9%
|
|
| None. None. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Not equal benefits, the 5% benefits. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Not familiar with PCB1. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Not organized NHTS sponsored; Not consulting other sponsored agencies; Support from other sponsored agencies not sustainable (politics) | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Ok, The PCB is good. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| One of our problem is our funds; We also need another comnputer for our facility; We don't know about the budget, only our municipality knows about the funds. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Our PFP was reduced because RHU & LGU's PFP are now equally divided. We hope that our PFP must be higher than LGU's since we have more work to be done compared to them. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PCB capitation fund decreased & delayed reimbursement, I would like to request to lessen the PCB requirements. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PCB guidelines must be fully implemented. It must provide necessary facilities in order to utilize services fully. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PCB is good, they give benefits, and it can help the needing people, it can boost our moral if we help them. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PCB is ok. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PCB services must be availed by everyone if possible. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PCB services should be upgraded for the quality of services needed by people. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PCB, it helped a lot of people & they are sujects themeselves for their health its good that there are people come to our facility so that we will know hoe to improve our services & know our short coming & also that will know the benefits in t | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PCB1 Should be given/rendered to every people in the community. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PCB1 help augment our budgetary requirements for the betterment of our health services. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PCB1 understanding is necessary so that all people avail the services in the facility. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PCB1-complete details but there's a lot of work. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PCBN1 helps us to update our patients even in far areas. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PhilHealth do not provide forms for the reports. We do not have budget to provide forms. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PhilHealth program is good but our share is never given. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Philhealth must conduct seminars to RHU staffs for us to be updated on informations on PCB. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Philhealth must provide an organized and well accomplished masterlist. They must also provide the fund on time for efficient use. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Plenty of reports and paper works. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Primary Care Benefit ( PCB ) intends to render quality health services to our target clients. We do appreciate such mechanism, however this mechanism for history enhancement is not well- organized and the hierarchy of benefits is not propertion | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Regard PCB capitation its long to receive | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Regards of the sharing scheme, it should be specified and be given according to the guidelines; it should be shared among health staff personnel only as guided by the protocol for the betterment of health facilities and not be shared among LG | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Sharing by percentage is fine. The validator is also given. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| So far it is ok because the poor members are catered. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| So m,uch paper works. We are not happy with the sharing scheme. The guidelines are not clear. They did not explain it well. More information dissemination about PCB. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| So many works, so many paper works and it's not properly compinsated, and distribution of PFP in not reasonable enough. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Some recepients of PCB, when being referred to their gov't. hospital, they are ask to pay some payments for medicines and consultations. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Sometimes there is unavailable medicines. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Suggestion for training on Acetic Acid training including nurse & midwife. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The PFP should be received regularly so that we could use the fund for medicines & supplies whenever we run out of stock. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The Physician's share in the PFP is too much aompared to other health staff. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The RHU now has a wider coverage of diseases that will be catered, and it is good so that patients will be manage in the RHU immediately. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The capitation is a big help to the RHU, its additional funding 3x the day requirments if the RHU. Many patients come one due to the enrollment HPN, TB symptomatic | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The capitation is not being used. We are asking to buy xerox machine so that we can use it to photocopy forms like the forms for profiling. The sharing of capitation is not fair. The capitation is not used to buy medicines. The masterlist of be | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The capitation is not enough. They have to increase it.; The sharing scheme should be more clear. ; The professional fee of the RHU personnel is being taxed. It should be tax free. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The capitation must be given on time, because we are catering a lot of PhilHealth members. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The forms given by PhilHealth to be filled up by us have small spaces so we were not able to write there clearly. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The fund should be released early so that needs of the RHU will be addressed on time. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The gap of PF between physician and health staff is very big. What is due to Caesar, give it to Caesar. Share should arrive on-time. Everybody (LGU, MHO) must be properly oriented before any program (PHIC). | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The partition that physician gets is too higher, 20% and 10% goes to physician. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The program is very beneficial to the constituents of this municipality especially to the availments of free medicines esp. to the marginalized family. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The records are inaccurate and are not updated. Late payment capitation and reimbursements. Philhealth is good specially for the indigents. Too much paper works. The guidelines are very strict. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The releasing budget in PCB is too much delay, and too much paper works. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The selection of beneficiaries is not clear. Some of them are not really indigents; Too much paperworks and we are under manned; Very little incentive for the other RHU personnel beside the doctor. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The service is good, it helps a lot. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The sharing of the professional fees is not fair. Capitation is always late. Philhealth staff are asking for donations from the Health Center. Too much paper works. RHU/HC staff have very small share from the capitation. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The sharing scheme guidelines of Philhealth is not being followed here in Baler by our former Mayor. Too much paper works. The capitations are very delayed. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| The supply we have is just enough since the district hospitals is near. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Ther is no plan if when they give the master list and the scheduling of payments. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| There are a lot of requirements that needs to be submitted in a short span of time. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| There are a lot of things to do with our nurses, and it is good that PCB1 has lots of benefits | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| There are many paperworks that needs to be submitted before they released capitation/PFP that sometimes we consume our whole duty hours for paperworks only. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| There are many requirements to be complied/accomplished. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| There are too many reports that has to be submitted to PhilHealth which are very confirming. PhilHealth should provide manpower to handle all the reports & other concern of regular in PCB1. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| There should be a transparency in the capitaiotn our RHU received and we ssould be informed as to how our share is being computed. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| There should be more equal share in capitation, the doctor's share is very big. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| There's should be a fair sharing of capitation since we woked the same load. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| They supposed to inform us early so that our files is not pending. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Though the payment is late, it is of big help to the beneficiaries. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| To increase the share of Medtechs PCB1 because our work is hazardous and the quantity of our worked is heavier than RHU staffs. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Too many paper works to accomplish. Big help to people and the facility of RHU. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Too many reports. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Too much paper works. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Too much paper works. Delayed capitation. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Too much paper works. Late distribution of capitation. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Too much paper works. Those that are doing the profiling are not well compensated. Super late capitation. The guidelines of the sharing scheme of the professional fee is not fair. The guidelines of philhealth are not clear specially in terms of | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Too much paper works. Too lettle compensation. Delayed capitation. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Too much paper works; Benefits are good; The capitation do not compensate the volume of paperwork; The enrollment of the Congressional District Office should include all those who are qualified | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Too much paper works; PCB is good because people, especially the NHTS beneficiaries are required to go to RHU; We need a med tech here we only have a microscopist. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Too much work just like enlisting, you need home visits; Profiling is hard too because client do not come here when they are called that's why we need to visit them at home; We have a problem with doctor because we do not have a permanent docto | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Until now, we haven't yet received the Health Profile that's why we could not get the PFP; There are so many things & work to be done in PCB. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Usually the medicines being given are not for ordinary disease is why sometimes they are expired and wasted. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| Very helpful to the people. Additional funds for the RHU. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We are running out of stocks of medicines, and their supply is not continious. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We hope PhilHealth gives us Hema analyzer & Blood Chemistry analyzer. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We hope that the money goes straight to the RHU and not to the LGU. Philhealth is asking too much paper works for the requirements. The percentage of the sharing of the professional fee is not clear and is not fair. The distribution of the prof | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We hope we get a PhilHealth payment notice; The capitation should only be used for health purposes only just like the former Mayor; The Philhealth reimbursement are not given on time. The requirements should be submitted in the provincial offic | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We like it. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We need advance notification so that we will be able to prepare the necessary documents and other related matter | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We receive the master list very late, and we need to pass it right away, sometimes it has a wrong address that indicate into the master list, it's effective to all people, and they avail free services. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We were able to receive share on PCB. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| We're not yet receiving PFP, we hope we'll be receiving PFP soon. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| When we submit requirements to philhealth, they sometimes get lost. Lack information dissemination regarding their programs. Super late distribution of capitation. Too much paper works without providing us with forms. Philhealth changes forms w | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| With regards to 20% sharing professional fee we hope the Phil may revised the guidelines. Gave the shares only to those who are directly involve in the health services/program. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| With regards to the sharing scheme, I suppose the greater share should go to the health personnel who actually do the hard task life profiling & enlistment. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| okay - Good program. | 1 |
0.5%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.