Enterprise Survey 2003-2016 Panel Data
Honduras, 2003 - 2017
Get Microdata
Reference ID
HND_2003-2016_ES-P_v01_M
Producer(s)
The World Bank
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Nov 19, 2018
Last modified
Nov 19, 2018
Page views
29703
Downloads
4202
- Data files
- Honduras_2003_2006_2010_2016
CIUDAD SEDE (ciudsede)
Data file: Honduras_2003_2006_2010_2016
Overview
Valid:
450
Invalid:
1128
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
3337
End:
3338
Width:
2
Range:
1 - 84
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | La Ceiba | 13 |
2.9%
|
| 2 | Tela | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 5 | Choluteca | 20 |
4.4%
|
| 6 | Saba | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 7 | Trujillo | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 8 | Sonaguera | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 9 | Tocoa | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 11 | Comayagua | 21 |
4.7%
|
| 12 | Siguatepeque | 12 |
2.7%
|
| 15 | San Pedro Sula | 98 |
21.8%
|
| 16 | Choloma | 15 |
3.3%
|
| 17 | La Lima | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 18 | Potrerillos | 0 |
0%
|
| 19 | Puerto Cortés | 3 |
0.7%
|
| 20 | Sta. Cruz de Yohoa | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 21 | Villanueva | 7 |
1.6%
|
| 22 | Chamelecon | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 23 | Ruinas de Copan | 0 |
0%
|
| 24 | Santa Rosa de Copán | 9 |
2%
|
| 25 | Nueva Arcadia | 0 |
0%
|
| 26 | La Entrada | 0 |
0%
|
| 28 | El Paraiso | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 29 | Dalí | 15 |
3.3%
|
| 30 | Trojes | 0 |
0%
|
| 31 | Yusacarán | 0 |
0%
|
| 32 | Jacalepa | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 34 | Tegucilgapa | 88 |
19.6%
|
| 35 | Guaymaca | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 36 | Talanga | 3 |
0.7%
|
| 37 | Valle de Angeles | 4 |
0.9%
|
| 38 | Ojojona | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 39 | Snata Lucia | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 40 | Comayagua | 11 |
2.4%
|
| 42 | S. Juan Flores | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 43 | Campamento | 3 |
0.7%
|
| 44 | Juticalpa | 22 |
4.9%
|
| 45 | Catacamas | 11 |
2.4%
|
| 46 | Sta. María Real | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 49 | Nacaome | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 50 | San Lorenzo | 6 |
1.3%
|
| 51 | Yuscarán | 0 |
0%
|
| 54 | El Progreso | 20 |
4.4%
|
| 55 | El Negrito | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 56 | Olanchito | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 57 | Santa Rita | 0 |
0%
|
| 58 | Sulaco | 0 |
0%
|
| 59 | Yoro | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 60 | Carolina Norte | 4 |
0.9%
|
| 61 | Pensilvania | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 62 | Hong Kong | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 63 | Miami Florida | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 64 | Taipei, Taiwan | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 65 | Santa Bárbara, Naco | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 66 | Pekín, China | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 67 | San José, Costa Rica | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 68 | Atlanta Georgia | 5 |
1.1%
|
| 69 | Nashville, Tennesse | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 70 | Corea | 3 |
0.7%
|
| 72 | Michigan EEUU | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 73 | Zip, Búfalo | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 74 | EEUU | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 75 | Portmounth, Ohio | 0 |
0%
|
| 76 | New York | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 77 | Suiza | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 78 | Roatán | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 79 | Wisconsin | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 81 | Inglaterra | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 82 | San Pedro de Tutule | 6 |
1.3%
|
| 83 | La Paz | 3 |
0.7%
|
| 84 | Canáda, Montreal | 1 |
0.2%
|
| Sysmiss | 1128 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.