Land Husbandry, Water Harvesting and Hillside Irrigation Project Impact Evaluation 2016, Fourth Follow-up Survey

Rwanda, 2016

Get Microdata

Reference ID

RWA_2016_LWHIE-F4_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/wa4f-k025

Producer(s)

Florence Kondylis, Maria Jones, Saahil Karpe

Collection(s)

Development Impact Evaluation (DIME) Impact Evaluation Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Dec 13, 2018

Last modified

Dec 13, 2018

Page views

72209

Downloads

11365

Why was the agricultural decision maker not the main respondent? (bc_not_decisionmaker)

Data file: lwh_followup4

Overview

Valid: 8

Invalid: 997

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 20712

End: 20712

Width: 1

Range: 1 - 4

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	Person was gone from the HH for more than 3 days	3	37.5%
2	Person was gone from the HH for 1-2 days	0	0%
3	Do not know, he was available	0	0%
4	Other reason	5	62.5%
Sysmiss		997

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Others

Notes

Why was the agricultural decision maker not the main respondent?

Back to Catalog