Protecting Early Childhood Development Impact Evaluation 2014-2015, Endline Survey
Malawi, 2014 - 2015
Get Microdata
Reference ID
MWI_2014_PECDIE-EL_v01_M
Producer(s)
Berk Ozler, Michelle J. Neuman, Lia Fernald
Metadata
Created on
Mar 08, 2019
Last modified
Mar 13, 2019
Page views
106801
Downloads
2515
comments (q15_spec)
Data file: r3.cbcc.co_clean_noid
Overview
Valid:
171
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
79
End:
150
Width:
72
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALL WENT WELL | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| ALL WENT WELL, BUT THE SCHOOL NAME IS NTHUNDU NOT CHIDOTHENJODI. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| DONE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| EXCELLENT | 5 |
2.9%
|
|
| GOOD | 17 |
9.9%
|
|
| GOOD OBSERVATION | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| IT WAS A GOOD OBSERVATION | 3 |
1.8%
|
|
| IT WAS A NICE OBSERVATION | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| IT WAS A NICE OBSERVATION. NO TROUBLES AT ALL | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| IT WAS GOOD | 15 |
8.8%
|
|
| IT WAS GOOD ALTHOUGH IT WAS MUCH ABOUT NATURAL SPEAKING | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| IT WAS GOOD AND THEY SEEM TO BE WELL ORGANISED | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| IT WAS GOOD BUT THEY DO NOT HAVE ACTIVITY CORNERS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| IT WAS GOOD OBSERVATION THOUGH THERE IS NO CHILDREN'S CORNER AT THE CBCC | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| IT WAS VERY GOOD | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| IT WAS WELL COMPLETED | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| IT WAS WELL DONE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOTES | 40 |
23.4%
|
|
| OBSERVATION WAS GOOD | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SUCCESSFUL | 4 |
2.3%
|
|
| SUCCESSFUL BUT THEY DONT HAVE CHILDREN'S CORNER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SUCCESSFUL, BUT THEY DON'T HAVE CHILDREN'S CORNER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SUCCESSFULL | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SUCCESSFULLY DONE | 11 |
6.4%
|
|
| THE CARE GIVER WAS WELL ORGANISED AND IT WAS A GOOD OBSERVATION. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THE CBCC OPERATES UNDER THE TREE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| THE NAME OF THE CBCC IS NYAMBWA AND NOT NYABWA | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THE OBSERVATION WAS DONE GOOD | 8 |
4.7%
|
|
| THE OBSERVATION WAS EXCELLENT | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| THE OBSERVATION WAS GOOD | 7 |
4.1%
|
|
| THE OBSERVATION WAS GOOD ONLY THAT THEY STARTED LATE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THE OBSERVATION WAS GOOD. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THE OBSERVATION WENT ON WELL | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| VERY GOOD | 3 |
1.8%
|
|
| WAS FINE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| WAS GOOD | 11 |
6.4%
|
|
| WAS SUCCESSFUL | 6 |
3.5%
|
|
| WAS WELL COMPLETED WITH NO PROBLEMS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| WELL DONE | 10 |
5.8%
|
|
| WELL DONE THOUGH IT WAS RAINING. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| WENT ON WELL | 1 |
0.6%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.