Home / Central Data Catalog / SIEF / MWI_2014_PECDIE-EL_V01_M / variable [F4]
sief

Protecting Early Childhood Development Impact Evaluation 2014-2015, Endline Survey

Malawi, 2014 - 2015
Get Microdata
Reference ID
MWI_2014_PECDIE-EL_v01_M
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48529/1g2d-4r78
Producer(s)
Berk Ozler, Michelle J. Neuman, Lia Fernald
Collection(s)
The Strategic Impact Evaluation Fund (SIEF) Impact Evaluation Surveys
Metadata
Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Mar 08, 2019
Last modified
Mar 13, 2019
Page views
105327
Downloads
2513

15. comments regarding visits (csq15)

Data file: r3.child.child_assessments_noid

Overview

Valid: 1971
Invalid: 0
Type: Discrete
Start: 285
End: 384
Width: 100
Range: -
Format: character

Questions and instructions

Categories
Value Category Cases
1 1
0.1%
ADMINISTERED SUCCESFULLY 1
0.1%
ALL ASSESSMENTS COMPLETED 1
0.1%
ALL CHILD ASSESSMENTS WERE COMPLETED 1
0.1%
ALL TEST WERE DONE 1
0.1%
ALL TESTS HAVE BEEN ADMINISTERED 1
0.1%
ALL TESTS WERE ADMINISTERED 1
0.1%
ALL TESTS WERE COMPLETD 1
0.1%
ALL THE RESPONDENTS TOOK THEIR TIME DURING THE ACTIVITIES (CHILD AND MOTHER) 1
0.1%
ALL THE RESPONDENTS WERE FLEXIBLE AND PARTICIPATED IN THE ACTIVITIES. 1
0.1%
ASSESSMENTS COMPLETED 1
0.1%
BRILLIANT CHILD 1
0.1%
CHILD CHANGED SURNAME TO JOHN FROM PASALIYAPA BECAUSE THE PREVIOUS NAME BELON TO HER GRANDFATHER. 1
0.1%
CHILD COOPERATIVE. 1
0.1%
CHILD DOENT ATTEND SCHOOL EVER SINCE LAST ACADEMIC YEAR. EVEN THIS YEAR DINT CAME TO SCHOOL. 1
0.1%
CHILD DOESN'T KNOW HOW READ DOUBLE NUMBERS I.E ANY NUMBER ABOVE 9 (CHILD IT BY HIMSELF) 1
0.1%
CHILD FAILED TRAINING ITEMS ON PPVT 1
0.1%
CHILD HAS MENTAL PROBLEMS 1
0.1%
CHILD RESPONDENT HAD A LOT OF DIFFICULTIES UNDERSTANDING INSTRUCTIONS EVEN AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS. 1
0.1%
CHILD RESPONDENT SHOWED LITTLE ATTENTION AND INTEREST THOUGH SHE STILL COOPERATED 1
0.1%
CHILD RESPONDENT WAS ATTENTIVE AND ACTIVE. 1
0.1%
CHILD RESPONDENT WAS GOOD AT ANSWERING 1
0.1%
CHILD RESPONDENT WAS GOOD THOUGH HE WAS SICK. 1
0.1%
CHILD RESPONDENT WAS GOOD THROUGH HIS ATTENTION OFTEN WANDERED. 1
0.1%
CHILD RESPONDENT WAS SICK SO SOMETIMES WAS SLOW 1
0.1%
CHILD RESPONDENT WAS VERY GOOD. 1
0.1%
CHILD VERY COOPERATIVE. 1
0.1%
CHILD WAS MOVING AROUND ALOT AND SHE WAS OFF TASK MOST OF THE INTERVIEW TIME. 1
0.1%
CHILD WAS SHY BUT HAPPY WITH COMPLETING THE TASK. 1
0.1%
CHILD WAS VERY INTERACTIVE. CHILD IS LIVING WITH A NEW GUARDIAN.AISHA&ALEFA ARE COUSINS 1
0.1%
CHILD WAS VERY SLOW. 1
0.1%
CHILD/RESPONDENT WAS NOT INTERESTED 1
0.1%
CHIULD WAS SO SICK SO COULD NOT DO TESTS AT A GOOD PACE 1
0.1%
COMPLETE 1
0.1%
COMPLETED 11
0.6%
COMPLETED ALL CHILD ASSESSMENTS 4
0.2%
COMPLETED ALL TESTS 2
0.1%
COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY 1
0.1%
COMPLETED THE CHILD ASSESSMENTS 1
0.1%
COMPLETED. 5
0.3%
COMPLETELY DONE 3
0.2%
COMPLETELY DONE ALTHOUGH THE CHILD WAS PLAYFULL 1
0.1%
COMPLETELYY DONE 1
0.1%
COOPERATIVE AND FRIENDLY ENJOYED THE TASK 1
0.1%
COOPERATIVE AND HE ENJOYED THE TASK 1
0.1%
COOPERATIVE AND VERY FRIENDLY AND HE ENJOYED THE TASK.GOOD 1
0.1%
DONE 28
1.4%
DONE WELL 1
0.1%
DONE. 3
0.2%
DURING M/G INTERVIEW, THE M/G SAID CHILD IS STD 3 AND LAST YR WAS IS STD 2,CURRENTLY ALSO IN STD 2, 1
0.1%
EGMA PARTIALLY COMPLETE BECAUSE THE CHILD DID NOT KNOW THE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NUMBERS. 1
0.1%
EXCELLENT 1
0.1%
FAIR 1
0.1%
GOOD 905
45.9%
GOOD HE ENJOYED THE TASK. 1
0.1%
GOOD INTERVIEW 67
3.4%
GOOD INTERVIEW THE CHILD WAS COORPERATIVE 1
0.1%
GOOD INTERVIEW. 3
0.2%
GOOD INTERVIEW. CHILD IIS A LITTLE AGRESSIVE 1
0.1%
GOOD INTERVIW 1
0.1%
GOOD RESPONDENT 1
0.1%
GOOD TRANSILATION BY M/G 1
0.1%
GOOD. 403
20.4%
GREAT 1
0.1%
HE WAS VERY ATTENTIVE TO THE TASKS. 1
0.1%
INSTRUCTIONS WERE CLEAR, THE CHILD PAID FULL ATTENTION 1
0.1%
INTERVIEW AND ADMINISTRATION OF TESTS WAS DONE SUCCESSFULLY. 1
0.1%
INTERVIEW WAS GOOD 1
0.1%
INTERVIEW WAS GOOD BUT CHILD WAS NOT INTERACTIVE ENOUGH. 1
0.1%
INTERVIEW WAS GOOD&CHILD WAS ENTHUASTIC& EASY TO ENGAGE IN TASKS. 1
0.1%
INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL ONLY THAT EGMA WAS PARTIALLY COMPLETED BECAUSE THE BECAUSE THE CHILD FAILED 1
0.1%
INTERVIEW WENT WELL 1
0.1%
IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE M/G IS 'EPHELO" BUT REAL NAME IS EHTEL. 1
0.1%
IT WAS A GOOD INTERVIEW 5
0.3%
IT WAS A GOOD VISIT 1
0.1%
IT WAS A NICE INTERVIEW 1
0.1%
IT WAS A SUCCESSFUL INTERVIEW 6
0.3%
IT WAS AN AWESOME VISIT.THE PARTICIPANTS WHERE WELCOMING 1
0.1%
IT WAS CONDUCTED WELL 1
0.1%
IT WAS CONDUCTED WELL 2
0.1%
IT WAS DONE WELL AND COMPLETE, THE CHILD ENJOYED THE TEST. 1
0.1%
IT WAS FINE 2
0.1%
IT WAS GOOD 18
0.9%
IT WAS GOOD AND SUCCESSFUL 1
0.1%
IT WAS GOOD AND THE CHILD ENJOYS ALOT PPVT TEST. 1
0.1%
IT WAS GOOD BUT DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF THE WAETHER 1
0.1%
IT WAS GOOD ONLY THAT THE RESPONDENT DIDNT KNOW NUMBERS,SINCE HE IS IN FIRST CLASS AT PRIMARY SCHOOL 1
0.1%
IT WAS GOOD, ALTHOUGH THE CHILD WAS SHY 1
0.1%
IT WAS GOOD, THE CHILD WAS SOMETIMES EASY TO ENGAGE WITH AND SHOWED LITTLE INTEREST IN TASK. 1
0.1%
IT WAS GOOD,THE CHILD WAS EASY TO ENGAGE WITH AND EVERYTHING WAS FINE 1
0.1%
IT WAS GOOD. 2
0.1%
IT WAS GOOD; THE CHILD WAS SO FRIENDLY AND HE ENJOYED THE TASK& VERY COOPERATIVE 1
0.1%
IT WAS GREAT, THE CHILD WAS EASY TO ENGAGE IN TASK AND PAID ATTENTION TO THE INSTRUCTION 1
0.1%
IT WAS HARD 1
0.1%
IT WAS NICE 1
0.1%
IT WAS OKEY 2
0.1%
IT WAS REALLY VERY BAD, THE CHILD HAD DIFFICULTIES IN UNDERSTANDING THE TESTS, SO I HAD TO TRY HARD. 1
0.1%
IT WAS SUCCESSFUL 5
0.3%
IT WAS SUCCESSFUL, EVERY THING WENT WELL 1
0.1%
IT WAS SUCCESSFUL, THE CHILD WAS CLEVER AND EASY TO ENGAGE WITH AND ENJOYED THE TEST 1
0.1%
IT WAS SUCCESSFULL,THOUGH SOME OF THE TIME THE CHILD HAD LITTLE INTEREST IN TASK. 1
0.1%
IT WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. 1
0.1%
IT WAS VERY GOOD 7
0.4%
IT WAS VERY GOOD AND SUCCESSFUL 1
0.1%
IT WAS VERY GOOD INTERVIEW 1
0.1%
IT WAS VERY GOOD INTERVIEW AND THE CHILD WAS VERY PARTICIPATIVE 1
0.1%
IT WAS VERY GOOD. 1
0.1%
IT WAS VERY INTERESTING INTERVIEW 1
0.1%
IT WAS VERY VERY GOOD 1
0.1%
IT WAS WELL CONDUCTED 6
0.3%
IT WAS WELL CONDUCTED AND THE RESPONDENT WAS COORPARATIVE 1
0.1%
IT WAS WELL CONDUCTED AND THE RESPONDENT WELL RESPONDED 1
0.1%
IT WENT WELL 1
0.1%
JUST GREAT. 1
0.1%
MIND WANDERED ALOT 1
0.1%
NICE INTERVIEW 1
0.1%
NONE 7
0.4%
NOTE 12
0.6%
NOTES 5
0.3%
NOTES. 4
0.2%
PERFECT 1
0.1%
RESPONDEN HAD DIFFICULTIES IN UNDERSTANDING INSTRUCTIONS 1
0.1%
RESPONDENT DIDNT SHOW ANY INTEREST, SHE WAS SLOW. 1
0.1%
RESPONDENT WAS COOPERATIVE THOUGH WAS HUNGRY. 1
0.1%
RESPONDENT WAS EASY WHEN ENGAGING TESTS 1
0.1%
RESPONDENT WAS GOOD 2
0.1%
RESPONDENT WAS REALLY GOOD 1
0.1%
RESPONDENT WAS SLOW AND RELACTANT WHEN ATTEMPTING SOME TESTS 1
0.1%
RESPONDENT WAS VERY GOOD 1
0.1%
RESPONDENT WAS VERY GOOD AND EASILY DID THE TESTS GIVEN TO HER. 1
0.1%
SHE WAS VERY SHY TO COMPLETE THE TEST 1
0.1%
SUCCEFFULLY TRACKED 1
0.1%
SUCCEFUL INTERVIEW 3
0.2%
SUCCEFULLY DONE 1
0.1%
SUCCEFULLY TRACKED 1
0.1%
SUCCESFUL 1
0.1%
SUCCESFUL INTERVIEW 7
0.4%
SUCCESFUL INTERVIEW. 2
0.1%
SUCCESFUL INTERVIEWS 1
0.1%
SUCCESFULLY ADMINISTERED 1
0.1%
SUCCESFULLY DONE 2
0.1%
SUCCESIFULLY COMPLETED. 1
0.1%
SUCCESS 1
0.1%
SUCCESSFUL 43
2.2%
SUCCESSFUL GOOD. 1
0.1%
SUCCESSFUL INTERVIEW 24
1.2%
SUCCESSFUL INTERVIEW. 1
0.1%
SUCCESSFUL ONE 8
0.4%
SUCCESSFUL TRACKED 2
0.1%
SUCCESSFUL VISIT 2
0.1%
SUCCESSFUL. 2
0.1%
SUCCESSFULL 12
0.6%
SUCCESSFULL COMPLETED 1
0.1%
SUCCESSFULL INTERVIEWS 1
0.1%
SUCCESSFULLY 4
0.2%
SUCCESSFULLY ADMINISTERED 1
0.1%
SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED 6
0.3%
SUCCESSFULLY DONE 27
1.4%
SUCCESSFULLY DONE. 2
0.1%
SUCCESSFULLY DONE. THE CHILD ENJOYED THE TEST. 1
0.1%
SUCCESSFULLY TRACKED 11
0.6%
SUCCESSFULLY TRACKED AND ASSESSED 4
0.2%
SUCCESSFULLY TRACKED AND ASSESSED. 4
0.2%
SUCCESSFULY COMPLETED 1
0.1%
SUCCESSFULY DONE 2
0.1%
SUCCESSSFUL INTERVIEW 1
0.1%
SUCESSFUL 1
0.1%
SUCESSFUL INTERVIEW 2
0.1%
TEST WASNT COMPLETED COZ RESPONDENT COULDNT TALK, RESPONDENT IS ABLE TO TALK BUT REFUSED TO ATTEMPT 1
0.1%
THE CHILD CHOWED INTEREST IN THE TESTS CONDUCTED. 1
0.1%
THE CHILD ENJOYED THE ASSESSMENTS 1
0.1%
THE CHILD IS STUMMER AND THERFORE HE COULD TAKE MORE THAN 5SECONDS TO RESPOND ESPECIALLY IN EGMA, 1
0.1%
THE CHILD PAID ATTENTION 1
0.1%
THE CHILD PAID FULL ATTENTION AND SHOWED INTERESTS IN THE TASKS. 1
0.1%
THE CHILD PAID FULL ATTENTION, THERE WERE NO DISTURBANCES 1
0.1%
THE CHILD PARTICIPATED NICELY&HE WAS CAPABLE OF DOING SOME TESTS WHILE OTHER TEST DID NOT DO MUCH 1
0.1%
THE CHILD RESPONDENT WAS STAMMERING 1
0.1%
THE CHILD SHOWED INTEREST AND PAID ATTENTION 1
0.1%
THE CHILD SHOWED INTEREST IN THE TESTS 1
0.1%
THE CHILD SHOWED INTEREST IN THE TESTS CONDUCTED 1
0.1%
THE CHILD WAS COOPERATIVE 1
0.1%
THE CHILD WAS EASILY DISTRACTED FROM TEST ACTIVITIES. 1
0.1%
THE CHILD WAS EASY TO ENGAGE IN TASKS 1
0.1%
THE CHILD WAS EASY TO ENGAGE IN TASKS AND SHOWED INTEREST. 1
0.1%
THE CHILD WAS ENGANGED WITH ALL THE TASK 1
0.1%
THE CHILD WAS SICK, IT WASNT A SIMPLE THING TO DRAW ATTENTION OF THE CHILD ON THE TASK. 1
0.1%
THE CHILD WAS SO MUCH EXCITED WITH THE TESTS 1
0.1%
THE CHILD WAS VERY COURAGEOUS 1
0.1%
THE CHILD WAS VERY SHY AND HE ENJOYED THE TASK. 1
0.1%
THE CHILS HAD DIFFICULTIES IN UNDERSTANDING THE TASK. 1
0.1%
THE INTERVIEW WAS CHALLENGING, THE CHILD HAD PROBLEMS IN UNDERSTANDING AND DOING THE TASKS. 1
0.1%
THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED WELL 1
0.1%
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD 4
0.2%
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD ALTHOUGH THE KID WAS STAMMERING LITTLE BIT 1
0.1%
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD, THE CHILD WAS VERY ACTIVE. 1
0.1%
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD. 1
0.1%
THE INTERVIEW WAS GREAT 3
0.2%
THE INTERVIEW WAS GREAT,THE CHILD WAS VERY COOPERATIVE 1
0.1%
THE INTERVIEW WAS GREAT. 2
0.1%
THE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL 3
0.2%
THE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL. 1
0.1%
THE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFULLY CONDUCTED 1
0.1%
THE INTERVIEW WAS WAS OKAY AND THE RESPONDENT PAYS MUCH ATTENTION TO THE QUESTIONS 1
0.1%
THE INTERVIEW WENT ON WELL. 2
0.1%
THE INTERVIEW WENT WELL 3
0.2%
THE INTERVIEW WENT WELL AND THE CHILD REALLY PAID MUCH ATTENTION DESPITE FAILING SOME TESTS. 1
0.1%
THE LANGAUGE WAS A BARRIER, THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND. 1
0.1%
THE RESPONDENT HAS DIFFICULTIES WITH FOAM TRIANGLES. 1
0.1%
THE RESPONDENT IS ALWAYS IN AND OUT OF THE HOSPITAL DUE TO ILLNESS 1
0.1%
THE RESPONDENT WAS FLEXIBLE AND PARTICIPATED IN ALL ACTIVITIES. 1
0.1%
THE VISIT WAS VERY SUCESSFUL 1
0.1%
THE WHOLE INTERVIEW WAS A SUCCESS, HAD AN INTELLIGENT CHILD ALTOGETHER. 1
0.1%
THE WHOLE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL 1
0.1%
THE WHOLE INTERVIEW WAS WELL DONE 1
0.1%
THE WHOLE INTERVIEW WENT WELL. 2
0.1%
THOUGH THE CHILD SIGNMENT SHY AND RELUCTANT TO PERFOM THE TEST HE STILL MANAGES TO FINISH ALL TEST 1
0.1%
TRACKED AND ASSESSED 1
0.1%
TRACKING SUCCESSFUL 1
0.1%
VERY GOOD 4
0.2%
VERY GOOD CHILD,SHE UNDERSTAND THINGS 1
0.1%
VERY SUCCESSFUL AND BOTH THE MOTHER AND THE CHILD WERE VERY COOPERATIVE. 1
0.1%
WAS GOOD 4
0.2%
WAS GOOD INTERVIEW THE CHILD WAS ABLE TO PERFORM ALL THE TASKS. 1
0.1%
WAS GOOD INTERVIEW. 1
0.1%
WAS GOOD SHE IS SO FRIENDLY 1
0.1%
WAS GOOD. 2
0.1%
WAS GOOD; THE CHILD WAS SO FRIENDLY. 1
0.1%
WAS GREAT 1
0.1%
WAS JUST A GREAT KID BUT HAD DIFFICULTIES IN UNDERSTANDING THINGS 1
0.1%
WAS JUST FINE THE CHILD SHOW INTEREST ON PERFORMING TASK. 1
0.1%
WAS JUST GOOD 1
0.1%
WAS SUCCESSFUL BUT NOT EASY 1
0.1%
WAS SUCCESSFULY DONE. 1
0.1%
WE HAVE A NEW M/G MARY MANDA.THE OLD M/G WENT TO TANZANIA 1
0.1%
WELL CONDUCTED 61
3.1%
WELL CONDUCTED BUT DID NOT PROCEED WITH EGMA BECAUSE TASK IN EGMA WAS FAILED. 1
0.1%
WELL CONDUCTED ON THE SECOND REVISIT 1
0.1%
WELL CONDUCTED. 1
0.1%
WELL COUNDUCTED 1
0.1%
WELL DONE 3
0.2%
WELL DONE, THE RESPONDENT WAS COORPERATE AND THE PARTICIPATION WAS OKAY. 1
0.1%
WELL DONE. 1
0.1%
WENT WELL 4
0.2%
WENT WELL THE CHILD THE CHILD ENJOYED THE TASK. 1
0.1%
WENT WELL. 1
0.1%
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog

This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.