National Panel Survey 2015-2016
Uganda, 2015 - 2016
Get Microdata
Reference ID
UGA_2015_UNPS_v02_M
Producer(s)
Uganda Bureau of Statistics
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
May 31, 2019
Last modified
Jan 30, 2020
Page views
196392
Downloads
13563
- Data files
- gsec1
- gsec2
- gsec3
- gsec4
- gsec5
- gsec6_1
- gsec6_3
- gsec8
- gsec9
- gsec10_1
- gsec10_2
- gsec10_3
- gsec11_1
- gsec11_2
- gsec12_1
- gsec12_2
- gsec14
- gsec14b
- gsec15b
- gsec15bb
- gsec15bb_2
- gsec15bb_3
- gsec15c
- gsec15d
- gsec15e
- gsec17_1
- gsec17_2
- gsec17_3
- gsec17_4
- gsec19
- WSEC1A
- WSEC2
- WSEC3
- WSEC4
- WSEC5
- AGSEC1
- AGSEC2A
- AGSEC2AB_1
- AGSEC2B
- AGSEC3A
- AGSEC3A_1
- AGSEC3B
- AGSEC3B_1
- AGSEC4A
- AGSEC4A_1
- AGSEC4B
- AGSEC4B_1
- AGSEC5A
- AGSEC5B
- AGSEC6A
- AGSEC6A_1
- AGSEC6B
- AGSEC6B_1
- AGSEC6C
- AGSEC6C_1
- AGSEC7A1
- AGSEC7B
- AGSEC8A
- AGSEC8B
- AGSEC8C
- AGSEC9A
- AGSEC9B
- AGSEC10
- AGSEC11
- CSEC1A
- CSEC1B
- CSEC2A
- CSEC2B_1
- CSEC2C_1
- CSEC2C_2
- CSEC3A
- CSEC3A_1
- CSEC3B_1
- CSEC3C
- CSEC3D
- CSEC3E
- CSEC3F
- CSEC3G
- CSEC3H
- CSEC3I
- CSEC3J
- CSEC3K
- CSEC3K_1
- CSEC3L_1
- CSEC4A_1
- CSEC4B_1
- CSEC4C
- CSEC4D
- CSEC4D_1
- CSEC4E
- CSEC4F_1
- CSEC4G_1
- CSEC4H
- CSEC4H_1
- CSEC4I_1
- CSEC4J_1
- CSEC4K
- CSEC4K_1
- CSEC4L
- CSEC4M
- CSEC4N
- CSEC4N_1
- CSEC4O
- CSEC4O_2
- CSEC4P_1
- CSEC4Q_1
- CSEC5A
- CSEC5B
- CSEC5C
- CSEC5D
- CSEC5Q_1
- CSEC6A_1
- CSEC6B
- CSEC6C
- CSEC6D
- CSEC6E
- CSEC6F_1
- GSEC16
- pov2015_16
Other constraints faced by this sub-county in terms if maintenance and repair of (Other_C5DQ22)
Data file: CSEC5D
Overview
Valid:
67
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
30
End:
118
Width:
89
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAD TERRAIN DUE TO HEAVY RAINS | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| BAD WEATHER | 4 |
6%
|
|
| CHALLENGE IN BUDGET TOP BOTTOM KIND OF PLANNING | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| COMPESATION MONEY ISNT AVAILABLE, POOR ADMINISTRATION IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| CONSTANT BREAKDOWN OF EQUIPMENTS | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| Compesation procedures | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| DELAY BY CONTRACTOR | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| DELAY BY CONTRACTORS | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| DELAY IN PROCUREMENT PROCESS | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| FREQUENT BREAK DOWN OF EQUIPMENT AND HIGH COST OF REPAIR A ND DELAYED RESPONSE TO REPAIRS | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| FREQUENT BREAK DOWN OF MACHINES | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| HEAVY VEHICLES | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| Hilly areas | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| IGNORANCE OF THE COMMUNITIY | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| Inadequate equipments | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| LACK OF EQUIPMENTS | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| LACK OF SUPERVISION BY ROAD INSPECTORS | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| LONG PROCUREMENT PROCESS | 2 |
3%
|
|
| Lack of Grader | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| Lack of a grader | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| Lack of equipment | 2 |
3%
|
|
| Local govement poor policy | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| MISUSE OF THE ROADS | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| Misuse of roads by the community | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| NO FUND FOR COMPENSATION | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| Nature of land is Hilly | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| Nature of land(Hilly) | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| No grader | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| POLITICAL INTERFERANCE | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| POOR IMPLEMENTATION | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| POOR SOIL TEXTURE | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| POOR SOILS | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| POOR SUPERVISION BY THE DISTRICT LEADS TO SHOODY WORK | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| POOR TYPE OF SOIL | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| POOR USAGE OF ROADS BY THE COMMUNITY | 2 |
3%
|
|
| Poor road equipment | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| SHOODY CONSTRUCTION | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| SHOODY WORK ON DISTRICT ROADS BY THE DISTRICT | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| STRICT GUIDE BY THE ROAD FUND | 2 |
3%
|
|
| STRINGS ATTACHED TO THE ROAD FUNDS | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| Swampy areas | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| TERRAIN | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| TYPE OF TERRAIN | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| TYPE OF TERRAIN, BEING HILLY | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| TYPE OF THE TERRAIN, FLOODS AND RIVER FLOWS | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| Weak road equipment | 2 |
3%
|
|
| bad weather | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| guideline regarding the use of the money is not sufficient for the people | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| high costs of materials | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| lack of a grader | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| lack of equipment | 2 |
3%
|
|
| lack of equipments | 2 |
3%
|
|
| lack of equipments and poor weather | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| lack of supervion by the district | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| miscultulation by the tecnical team | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| poor soil texture | 1 |
1.5%
|
|
| poor supervision by the engineers | 1 |
1.5%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.