National Panel Survey 2015-2016

Uganda, 2015 - 2016

Get Microdata

Reference ID

UGA_2015_UNPS_v02_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/hm2z-2k12

Producer(s)

Uganda Bureau of Statistics

Collection(s)

Living Standards Measurement Study (LSMS)

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

May 31, 2019

Last modified

Jan 30, 2020

Page views

196698

Downloads

13563

Reason Road Infrastructure not done (Reason_Road_Inf_Not_Done)

Data file: CSEC1A

Overview

Valid: 78

Type: Discrete

Start: 277

End: 384

Width: 108

Range: -

Format: character

Questions and instructions

Categories

Value	Cases
.	1	1.3%
ALL OUT OF OFFICE - IN THE FIELD	1	1.3%
AUTHORITIES AT THE SUB COUNTY ARE NEVER THERE	1	1.3%
AWAY FOR A MEETING	1	1.3%
BUSY WITH CAMPAIGNS, NOBODY IN OFFICE	1	1.3%
CHIEF ABSENT	1	1.3%
CHIEF WAS ABSENT	2	2.6%
ENGINEER ABSENT	2	2.6%
ENGINEER NOT IN OFFICE	1	1.3%
ENGINEER NOT IN OFFICE. WILL DO IT IN VISIT 2	1	1.3%
ENGINEER WAS ABSENT	1	1.3%
ENGINEER WAS SO BUSY SHE KEPT ON POSTPONDING THE APPOINTMENT DATES	1	1.3%
EVERYBODY HAD GONE TO THE FIELD	1	1.3%
EVERYBODY IN THE FIELD	1	1.3%
IN FORTPORTAL FOR A WORKSHOP	1	1.3%
MEETING AT THE DISTRICT	1	1.3%
NO ELIGIBLE RESPONDENT AT THE TIME OF THE VISIT	1	1.3%
NO OFFICIAL AT THE SUB-COUNTY	1	1.3%
NO ONE WAS PRESENT AT THE SUBCOUNTY	1	1.3%
NO SUB COUNTY CHIEF	1	1.3%
NOBODY IN OFFICE	2	2.6%
NOBODY IN OFFICE , FOR CAMPAIGNS	1	1.3%
NOBODY IN OFFICE - IN THE FIELD	1	1.3%
No competitent person at the time of the visit	1	1.3%
No official at the Sub-county took the GPS ONLY	1	1.3%
No roads, an Island.	1	1.3%
Not in office	4	5.1%
Not in office. Not very cooperative and not honouring appointements	1	1.3%
OFFICES AT THE SUBCOUNTY WERE CLOSED FOR PUBLIC HOLIDAY MARTYRS DAY	1	1.3%
OFFICIAL WERE AWAY FOR CAMPAIGNS	1	1.3%
OFFICIALS NOT IN OFFICE	1	1.3%
ONE RESPONSIBLE WAS ABSENT	1	1.3%
Officer not present at the Sub county the President had visited the district	1	1.3%
PUBLIC HOLIDAY	1	1.3%
RESPONSIBLE PERSON IS NEVER FOUND	1	1.3%
Relevant officer not in office. Not cooperative	1	1.3%
STAFF NOT IN OFFICE	1	1.3%
THE DIVISION ENGINEER WAS NOT AVAILABLE	1	1.3%
THE ENGINEER WAS SO B USY SO HE PROMISED TO HELP WHEN HE GETS TIME	1	1.3%
TO BE DONE IN SECOND VISIT	1	1.3%
TOO MUCH WAVES TO SAIL THERE	1	1.3%
The district engineer was busy at the time of visit but promised to help	1	1.3%
The division engineer was busy and promised to answer after two weeks	1	1.3%
To be copied	1	1.3%
To be done during second visit	1	1.3%
To get data from team 8	1	1.3%
Town council Engineer not in office	1	1.3%
WEEKEND	5	6.4%
WEEKEND - NO STAFF	1	1.3%
Weekend	2	2.6%
campaigns - nobody in office	1	1.3%
done by another team	1	1.3%
failed to find the engineer and others didnt know anything	1	1.3%
failed to see the engineer	1	1.3%
it was raining heavily and the road is impassable	1	1.3%
its hard to get the responsible person bse most of the time he is the field	1	1.3%
meeting	1	1.3%
no respondent at sub-county	1	1.3%
no staff at subcounty	1	1.3%
not in office	1	1.3%
officers busy preparing for the minister's visit at the sub county	1	1.3%
staff not in office	1	1.3%
subcounty chief was away for official duty. to be done on visit 2. he promised to meet me on the next visit.	1	1.3%
the sub county offices were closed at the time of the visit it was aweekend	1	1.3%
town clerk	1	1.3%
weekend	1	1.3%
weekend sub county closed	1	1.3%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog