The World Bank Working for a World Free of Poverty Microdata Library
  • Data Catalog
  • Collections
  • Citations
  • Terms of use
  • About
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / IMPACT_EVALUATION / BFA_2017_HRBFIE-FEL_V01_M
impact_evaluation

Results-Based Financing Impact Evaluation Health Facility 2017, Endline Survey

Burkina Faso, 2017
Get Microdata
Reference ID
BFA_2017_HRBFIE-FEL_v01_M
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48529/01gp-gm52
Producer(s)
Manuela de Allegri, Herve Hien, Paul Jacob Robyn
Collection(s)
Impact Evaluation Surveys Fragility, Conflict and Violence
Metadata
Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Aug 27, 2019
Last modified
Oct 01, 2019
Page views
96968
Downloads
1788
  • Study Description
  • Data Description
  • Documentation
  • Get Microdata
  • Related datasets
  • Identification
  • Version
  • Scope
  • Coverage
  • Producers and sponsors
  • Sampling
  • Survey instrument
  • Data collection
  • Data Access
  • Disclaimer and copyrights
  • Contacts
  • Metadata production
  • Citation
  • Identification

    Survey ID number

    BFA_2017_HRBFIE-FEL_v01_M

    Title

    Results-Based Financing Impact Evaluation Health Facility 2017

    Subtitle

    Endline Survey

    Country/Economy
    Name Country code
    Burkina Faso BFA
    Study type

    Administrative Records, Health (ad/hea]

    Series Information

    Results-Based Financing Impact Evaluation Health Facility Endline Survey, the baseline survey was conducted in six regions of Burkina Faso from October 2013 to March 2014.

    Abstract
    The endline survey of the impact evaluation for Health Performance-Based Financing (PBF) in Burkina Faso was conducted in six regions of Burkina Faso from April to June 2017.

    The main objective of the impact evaluation is to assess the impact of the PBF intervention on quality of care and health care utilization for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health services, while the baseline survey provides the empirical foundation for the assessment of impacts on a large variety of indicators. The baseline data collection for the impact evaluation took place between October 2013 and March 2014.

    The impact evaluation innovates by assessing the combination of PBF with two sets of additional measures to enhance equity, community-based targeting of the ultra-poor and subsidization of health services provided to them; and community-based health insurance. PBF was implemented at the district level in both primary- and secondary-level health facilities - with control districts in the same regions. The study used a blended experimental and quasi-experimental design, including both randomization of the standard PBF and PBF plus the additional equity measures at the facility-level within PBF districts to test the effects of these equity measures on outcomes of interest (experimental part), and a comparison of PBF districts to matched control districts to test the effects of PBF (pooled across all intervention arms with and without equity measures) compared to status quo (quasi-experimental part).
    Kind of Data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Unit of Analysis

    Health facility

    Version

    Version Description

    Version 01: Edited anonymous datasets

    Version Date

    2017-07-01

    Scope

    Notes

    The survey covered the following topics:

    • Facility assessment
    • Health worker interview
    • Observations of patient-provider interaction
    • Patient exit interviews

    Coverage

    Geographic Coverage

    12 intervention and 12 comparison districts across six regions: Centre-Nord, Nord, Sud-Ouest, Centre-Est, Boucle du Mouhoun, Centre-Ouest

    Universe

    All health facilities

    Producers and sponsors

    Primary investigators
    Name Affiliation
    Manuela de Allegri University of Heidelberg
    Herve Hien Centre Muraz
    Paul Jacob Robyn World Bank
    Producers
    Name Affiliation Role
    Julia Lohmann University of Heidelberg Researcher
    Saidou Hamadou World Bank Survey Expert
    Funding Agency/Sponsor
    Name Role
    World Bank, Health Results Innovation Trust Fund Funding agency
    Other Identifications/Acknowledgments
    Name Affiliation Role
    Ministry of Health Government of Burkina Faso Implementer

    Sampling

    Sampling Procedure

    The survey covered a total of 24 districts across 6 regions, 12 intervention districts and 12 control districts. All health facilities in intervention districts were included in the study. In control districts, a random sample of health facilities was drawn for an intervention-control facility ratio of approximately 3:1.

    In 8 intervention districts across 4 regions (Batié, Diébougou, Ouargaye, Tenkodogo, Kaya, Kongoussi, Gourcy, and Ouahigouya), health facilities were randomized to receive either the standard PBF (T1), PBF with systematic targeting and subsidization for the ultra-poor (T2), or PBF with systematic targeting, subsidization for the ultra-poor, and additional provider incentives to provide services to the ultra-poor (T3).

    In intervention districts in the Boucle du Mouhoun region (Nouna and Solenzo), health facilities randomized into 2 groups: standard PBF (T1) or PBF plus community-based health insurance and systematic targeting and subsidization for the poor and (T4).

    In the intervention districts in region 6 (Kuodougou, Sapouy), all health facilities received the standard PBF model (T1).

    As referral hospitals to all facilities in their respective districts, all hospitals (CM, CMA, CHR) in districts where randomization happened received T2.

    The randomization happened during public ceremonies in each region. All health personal from the regional level (Direction Régionale de la Santé (DRS), District level (Equipe Cadre de District, (ECD)) and local level (health facilities and district hospital) were invited to participate.

    Detailed information about randomization is available in the attached report.

    Deviations from the Sample Design

    None

    Response Rate

    100%, the health facility sample was a fully balanced panel

    Survey instrument

    Questionnaires

    The survey instruments are based on HRITF Impact Evaluation Toolkit templates. The facility-based survey comprised different tools for data collection with different data sources and respondents.

    The following questionnaires/forms were implemented:

    • Facility assessment module (Questionnaire F1)
    • Health worker interview module (Questionnaire F2)
    • Observations of patient-provider interaction module (Questionnaires F3 and F5)
    • Patient exit interviews (Questionnaires F4, F6 and F7)

    Data collection

    Dates of Data Collection
    Start End Cycle
    2017-04-01 2017-06-30 Endline
    Data Collectors
    Name Affiliation
    Centre Muraz Ministry of Health
    Supervision

    University of Heidelberg, Institute of Public Health and World Bank

    Data Access

    Access authority
    Name Affiliation Email
    Paul Jacob Robyn The World Bank probyn@worldbank.org
    Confidentiality
    Is signing of a confidentiality declaration required? Confidentiality declaration text
    yes All data are anonymous
    Access conditions

    Licensed access

    Citation requirements

    Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:

    • the Identification of the Primary Investigator
    • the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation)
    • the survey reference number
    • the source and date of download

    Paul Jacob Robyn, The World Bank; Manuela De Allegri, University of Heidelberg; Herve Hien, Centre Muraz. Burkina Faso Health Results-Based Financing Impact Evaluation 2017, Health Facility Endline Survey (HRBFIE-FEL). Ref. BFA_2017_HRBFIE-FBL_v01_M. Dataset downloaded from [URL] on [date].

    Disclaimer and copyrights

    Disclaimer

    The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

    Contacts

    Contacts
    Name Affiliation Email
    Paul Jacob Robyn World Bank probyn@worldbank.org
    Manuela de Allegri University of Heidelberg manuela.deallegri@uni-heidelberg.de

    Metadata production

    DDI Document ID

    DDI_BFA_2017_HRBFIE-FEL_v01_M

    Producers
    Name Affiliation Role
    Development Economics Data Group The World Bank Documentation of the DDI
    Date of Metadata Production

    2019-08-14

    Metadata version

    DDI Document version

    Version 01 (August 2019)

    Citation

    Citation
    loading, please wait...
    Citation format
    Export citation: RIS | BibTeX | Plain text
    Back to Catalog
    The World Bank Working for a World Free of Poverty
    • IBRD IDA IFC MIGA ICSID

    © The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved.

    This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.