Land Titling Impact Evaluation - Baseline Survey 2015
Uganda, 2015
Get Microdata
Reference ID
UGA_2015_LTIE-BL_v01_M
Producer(s)
Markus Goldstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Joao Montalvao, Christopher Udry, James Habyarimana
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Jun 09, 2022
Last modified
Jun 09, 2022
Page views
48283
Downloads
348
- Data files
- cedp_bs_0_cover_2015
- cedp_bs_1_hhroster_2015
- cedp_bs_2_laborsupply_2015
- cedp_bs_3_assets_2015
- cedp_bs_4a_parcelroster_2015
- cedp_bs_4b_plotroster_2015
- cedp_bs_4c_croproster_2015
- cedp_bs_5_crops_season1_2015
- cedp_bs_6_output_season1_2015
- cedp_bs_7a_input_season1_plot_2015
- cedp_bs_7b_activity_season1_act_2015
- cedp_bs_8a_input_season2_plot_2015
- cedp_bs_8b_input_season2_crop_2015
- cedp_bs_9_parcdet_2015
- cedp_bs_10_landrights_2015
- cedp_bs_11_conflicts_2015
- cedp_bs_12_landmkt_2015
- cedp_bs_13_transfers_2015
- cedp_bs_14_migration_male_2015
- cedp_bs_15_inheritance_male_2015
- cedp_bs_16_percrights_male_2015
- cedp_bs_17_credit_male_2015
- cedp_bs_18_migration_female_2015
- cedp_bs_19_marriage_female_2015
- cedp_bs_20_inheritance_female_2015
- cedp_bs_21_percrights_female_2015
- cedp_bs_22_decmaking_female_2015
- cedp_bs_23_credit_female_2015
- cedp_bs_24_relspouse_female_2015
- cedp_bs_plotsize_acres_2015
- community_bl2015_public_release
Please, specify other (q9_soil_oth)
Data file: cedp_bs_9_parcdet_2015
Overview
Valid:
53
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Width:
11
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Black soil | 9 |
17%
|
|
| Clay loam | 1 |
1.9%
|
|
| Clay soil | 3 |
5.7%
|
|
| Ekisoni | 1 |
1.9%
|
|
| Ennobe | 7 |
13.2%
|
|
| Enobe | 2 |
3.8%
|
|
| Enumbe | 1 |
1.9%
|
|
| Erikutukura | 1 |
1.9%
|
|
| Loam clay | 1 |
1.9%
|
|
| Marram | 1 |
1.9%
|
|
| Marrum | 1 |
1.9%
|
|
| Oruchuchu | 2 |
3.8%
|
|
| Red clay | 9 |
17%
|
|
| Red soil | 11 |
20.8%
|
|
| Sandy loam | 1 |
1.9%
|
|
| Sandy soil | 2 |
3.8%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.