Human Development Cash Transfer - Behavioral Work - Impact Evaluation 2016-2018
Baseline and Midline Surveys
Madagascar, 2016 - 2018
Get Microdata
Reference ID
MDG_2016-2018_HDCTIE-BL-ML_v01_M
Producer(s)
Saugato Datta, PhD, Laura Rawlings
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Nov 23, 2022
Last modified
Aug 29, 2023
Page views
34171
Downloads
290
Autre fruit? (b5_autre)
Data file: hdct_baseline_household_v1_aug.dta
Overview
Valid:
4484
Invalid:
-
Type:
Discrete
Start:
203
End:
229
Width:
27
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2965 |
66.1%
|
||
| ANANAS | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| ANGAVO | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CANNE A SUCRE | 25 |
0.6%
|
|
| COCO | 21 |
0.5%
|
|
| COEUR DE BOEUF | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| COROSSOL | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| COROSSOLE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FRANBOISE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FRAUIT SAUVAGE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FRUIT A PAIN | 2 |
0%
|
|
| FRUIT DE CACTUS | 2 |
0%
|
|
| FRUIT SAUVAGE | 8 |
0.2%
|
|
| FRUIT SAUVAGE (MAKOBA) | 38 |
0.8%
|
|
| FRUIT SAUVAGE (MOKOTRO) | 1 |
0%
|
|
| GEVIE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| GOYAVE | 2 |
0%
|
|
| GRENADELLE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| JAQUE | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| JAQUE CUIT | 27 |
0.6%
|
|
| JAQUE CUIT + CANNE A SUCRE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| JAQUE MURE | 387 |
8.6%
|
|
| JAQUE MURE + LITCHI | 1 |
0%
|
|
| JAQUE MURE + POCANNEL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| JAQUE MURE ET CANNE A SUCRE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| JAQUE MURE ET POCANNEL | 2 |
0%
|
|
| LITCHI | 385 |
8.6%
|
|
| LITCHI ET MAKOBA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| LITCHI ET PECHE | 8 |
0.2%
|
|
| MANGE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MANGUE ET PECHE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NEFLE | 2 |
0%
|
|
| OLIVA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PAISO,LETCHI | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| PECHE | 388 |
8.7%
|
|
| PECHE ET GRENADELLE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PECHE ET LITCHI | 15 |
0.3%
|
|
| POCANELLE + COROSSOLLE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| POCANNEL | 131 |
2.9%
|
|
| POCANNEL + JAQUE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| POCANNEL ET CANNE A CUCRE | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| POIRE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| POMME | 1 |
0%
|
|
| POMME CANEL | 2 |
0%
|
|
| SIMILIA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SINEFO | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TAMARIN | 24 |
0.5%
|
|
| TAMARIN ET CANNE A CUCRE | 1 |
0%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.