Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health 2014
Wave 2
Mexico, 2014
Get Microdata
Reference ID
MEX_2014_SAGE-W2_v01_M
Producer(s)
Mr. A. Salinas Rodriguez, Dr. B. Soledad Manrique Espinoza
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
May 19, 2023
Last modified
May 19, 2023
Page views
44117
q0106a: secondadmlevelname (q0106a)
Data file: MexicoHHDataW2
Overview
Valid:
5451
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Width:
28
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Literal question
Second Administrative Level Unit Name:
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 ACAPULCO DE JUÁREZ | 177 |
3.2%
|
|
| 001 AGUASCALIENTES | 148 |
2.7%
|
|
| 001 AHOME | 91 |
1.7%
|
|
| 001 AMEALCO DE BONFIL | 47 |
0.9%
|
|
| 001 COZUMEL | 35 |
0.6%
|
|
| 001 ENSENADA | 63 |
1.2%
|
|
| 002 CÁRDENAS | 53 |
1%
|
|
| 002 MEXICALI | 40 |
0.7%
|
|
| 002 MULEGÉ | 34 |
0.6%
|
|
| 003 AQUISMÓN | 52 |
1%
|
|
| 003 CARMEN | 84 |
1.5%
|
|
| 003 COYOACÁN | 97 |
1.8%
|
|
| 003 LA PAZ | 26 |
0.5%
|
|
| 004 CADEREYTA DE MONTES | 102 |
1.9%
|
|
| 004 CENTRO | 16 |
0.3%
|
|
| 004 CUENCAMÉ | 40 |
0.7%
|
|
| 004 OTHÓN P. BLANCO | 17 |
0.3%
|
|
| 004 TIJUANA | 164 |
3%
|
|
| 005 ALMOLOYA DE JUÁREZ | 41 |
0.8%
|
|
| 005 BENITO JUÁREZ | 14 |
0.3%
|
|
| 005 DURANGO | 76 |
1.4%
|
|
| 005 GUSTAVO A. MADERO | 49 |
0.9%
|
|
| 006 ARIZPE | 47 |
0.9%
|
|
| 006 CUAUTLA | 53 |
1%
|
|
| 006 CULIACÁN | 197 |
3.6%
|
|
| 007 CUERNAVACA | 20 |
0.4%
|
|
| 007 GÓMEZ PALACIO | 61 |
1.1%
|
|
| 008 EMILIANO ZAPATA | 24 |
0.4%
|
|
| 008 LA MAGDALENA CONTRERAS | 18 |
0.3%
|
|
| 010 EL LLANO | 55 |
1%
|
|
| 010 FRESNILLO | 51 |
0.9%
|
|
| 010 GUANACEVI | 31 |
0.6%
|
|
| 010 ÁLVARO OBREGÓN | 60 |
1.1%
|
|
| 011 ALVARADO | 54 |
1%
|
|
| 011 JIUTEPEC | 21 |
0.4%
|
|
| 012 MAZATLÁN | 20 |
0.4%
|
|
| 012 PEDRO ESCOBEDO | 38 |
0.7%
|
|
| 012 TLALPAN | 22 |
0.4%
|
|
| 013 ATIZAPÁN DE ZARAGOZA | 28 |
0.5%
|
|
| 013 CIUDAD VALLES | 21 |
0.4%
|
|
| 013 NACAJUCA | 50 |
0.9%
|
|
| 014 BENITO JUÁREZ | 50 |
0.9%
|
|
| 014 QUERÉTARO | 31 |
0.6%
|
|
| 016 MIGUEL HIDALGO | 12 |
0.2%
|
|
| 017 CUAUHTÉMOC | 29 |
0.5%
|
|
| 017 TEPIC | 116 |
2.1%
|
|
| 018 CAJEME | 108 |
2%
|
|
| 018 NAVOLATO | 53 |
1%
|
|
| 019 CHIHUAHUA | 26 |
0.5%
|
|
| 019 LAGUNILLAS | 50 |
0.9%
|
|
| 020 COACALCO DE BERRIOZÁBAL | 14 |
0.3%
|
|
| 020 JEREZ | 43 |
0.8%
|
|
| 020 LEÓN | 161 |
3%
|
|
| 021 COYUCA DE BENÍTEZ | 48 |
0.9%
|
|
| 022 EPAZOYUCAN | 53 |
1%
|
|
| 026 GUADALUPE | 93 |
1.7%
|
|
| 028 CHILAPA DE ÁLVAREZ | 43 |
0.8%
|
|
| 028 CHURINTZIO | 55 |
1%
|
|
| 028 HUEJUTLA DE REYES | 50 |
0.9%
|
|
| 028 SAN LUIS POTOSÍ | 81 |
1.5%
|
|
| 030 HERMOSILLO | 46 |
0.8%
|
|
| 030 SALTILLO | 37 |
0.7%
|
|
| 032 REYNOSA | 14 |
0.3%
|
|
| 033 ECATEPEC DE MORELOS | 46 |
0.8%
|
|
| 033 TLAXCALA | 27 |
0.5%
|
|
| 034 FRONTERA COMALAPA | 34 |
0.6%
|
|
| 035 TEPEHUANES | 14 |
0.3%
|
|
| 035 TORREÓN | 29 |
0.5%
|
|
| 036 VIESCA | 42 |
0.8%
|
|
| 037 JUÁREZ | 117 |
2.1%
|
|
| 038 TAMPICO | 44 |
0.8%
|
|
| 039 GUADALAJARA | 93 |
1.7%
|
|
| 039 MONTERREY | 152 |
2.8%
|
|
| 040 VALLE HERMOSO | 45 |
0.8%
|
|
| 042 VALLE DE SANTIAGO | 30 |
0.6%
|
|
| 043 NOGALES | 20 |
0.4%
|
|
| 045 JIQUILPAN | 38 |
0.7%
|
|
| 046 SAN NICOLÁS DE LOS GARZA | 44 |
0.8%
|
|
| 048 PACHUCA DE SOTO | 15 |
0.3%
|
|
| 048 PETATLÁN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 050 MÉRIDA | 133 |
2.4%
|
|
| 056 ZACATECAS | 22 |
0.4%
|
|
| 057 NAUCALPAN DE JUÁREZ | 20 |
0.4%
|
|
| 058 NEZAHUALCÓYOTL | 100 |
1.8%
|
|
| 058 TELOLOAPAN | 39 |
0.7%
|
|
| 063 TEPEJI DEL RÍO DE OCAMPO | 49 |
0.9%
|
|
| 067 TLAPEHUALA | 50 |
0.9%
|
|
| 098 TLAQUEPAQUE | 86 |
1.6%
|
|
| 101 TUXTLA GUTIÉRREZ | 32 |
0.6%
|
|
| 102 URUAPAN | 17 |
0.3%
|
|
| 103 TLALMANALCO | 37 |
0.7%
|
|
| 108 MINATITLÁN | 21 |
0.4%
|
|
| 108 ZAMORA | 50 |
0.9%
|
|
| 110 VALLE DE BRAVO | 34 |
0.6%
|
|
| 112 VALLE DE JUÁREZ | 41 |
0.8%
|
|
| 114 PUEBLA | 92 |
1.7%
|
|
| 120 ZAPOPAN | 90 |
1.7%
|
|
| 156 SAN ILDEFONSO VILLA ALTA | 46 |
0.8%
|
|
| 193 VERACRUZ | 14 |
0.3%
|
|
| 385 SANTA CRUZ XOXOCOTLÁN | 29 |
0.5%
|
|
| 387 SANTA GERTRUDIS | 50 |
0.9%
|
|
| 551 TLACOLULA DE MATAMOROS | 58 |
1.1%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Question post text
99 Not applicable if the unit is not in appendix list