Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
ABOLISHED ALREADY & REPLACED BY TRIO | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
ADMINISTRATION COST IS HIGH | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
ADMINISTRATIVE COST. TOO MUCH BUREAUCRACY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS ARE TOO HIGH | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
ADMINISTRTIVE EXPENSES | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
BUREAUCRACY IN THE GOVERNMENT SYSTEM | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
BUREAUCRACY IS TOO MUCH | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
BUREAUCRACY MAKE NOT USER FRIENDLY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
BUREAUCRANCY IN INDUSTRY OF TRADE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
CAN NOT QUALIFY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
COMPLICATED PROCESS/COMPETITIVE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DISCOURAGED DUE TO CHANGE OF RULES | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DO NOT EXPORT DIRECTLY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DO NOT NEED | 2 |
2.6%
|
|
DO NOT NEED FACILITIES | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DO NOT USE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DOES NOT DEED. | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DON'T QUALIFY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DONT KNOW ABOUT IT | 2 |
2.6%
|
|
EXPORT COMPONENT TOO LOW | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
EXPORT TAKE SMALL PROPORTION OF BUSINESS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
FOR TEXTILE INDUSTRIES | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
GOV'T BUREACRACY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
GOVERNMENT APPROVAL FOR EACH EXPORT CONSIGNMENT | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
GOVERNMENT HAVE BEEN RELUCTANT TO GIVE US | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HAS BEEN BENEFICIAL BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HAS CLOSED DOWN | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HAS LED TO ONCREASE ON PROFITABILITY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HAS NOT BOTHERED TO APPLY FOR COMPESATION | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HAS USED THE FACILITY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HAVE BEEN USING THE FACILITY EVER SINCE ESTABLISHMENT | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HIGH ADMINISTRATION COST | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
INDISPENSABLE- TO ENABLE IT COMPETE IN INTERNATIONAL MKT | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
IT HAS BEEN SCRAPPED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
IT IS MORE DIFFICULT & BUREAUCRATIC | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
IT MAKES NO DEFFERENCE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
IT WAS GOOD BUT NO LONGER THERE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
LEVEL FIELD MISSING | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NEVER EXPLOITED THEM | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NO COMMENT | 3 |
3.9%
|
|
NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NO PROBLEM | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT CONSIDERED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT IN LINE WITH HIS BUSSINESS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT REGULAR EXPORTERS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT USEFUL | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT WITHIN THE EPZ PRODUCTION PROCESS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT WITHIN THE LINE OF BUSINESS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT WITHIN THE LINE OF PRODUCTION | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOW OPERATES UNDER TREO | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
OF SLIGHT BENEFIT TO COMPANY. | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
REDUNDANT | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
RESPONDENT DIDN'T UNDERSTAND SOME OF THIS LAWS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
SECTOR NOT COVERED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
SHOULD BE REINTRODUCED OR THE TREO SYSTEM STREAMLINED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
STOPPED DUE TO TOO MUCH BOTTLENECKS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
STOPPED ON SOME PRODUCTS BECAUSE DUTIES SO LOW ANYWAY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
STOPPED WHEN DUTY WAS ZERO RATED ON RAW MATERIA | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
THE BENEFIT/REFUND HAS BEEN MINIMAL | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
THE LAW HAS BEEN CHANGED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF EXPORTATION GROWTH SINCE 2000 | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
THERE IS REDUCTION IN COST | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
TIME CONSUMING | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
TOO EXPENSIVE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
TOO MUCH BUREAUCRACY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
TOO MUCH PAPER WORK/BUREACRACY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
USED TO BE GOOD BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
USED TO BE THERE BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
VOLUME OF SALES LOST | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
WAS BENEFICIAL BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
WAS USING THE FACILITY BUT IT TURNED TO BE CUMBRSOME. | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
WE LIKE IT BECAUSE ITS WELL UNDERSTOOD | 1 |
1.3%
|
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.