Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
ADVANCE IN TECHNOLOGY AND MARKET NEEDS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
ADVANCEMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
ADVANCING THE PRODUCTION PROCESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
ALL MACHINES ARE STILL NEW AND USABLE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
BAD BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
BAD ECONOMIC SITUATION ESPECIALLY IN THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
BECAUSE OF CHANGE IN ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
BECAUSE OF THE EXPANSION OF THE BUSINESS SINCE JUNE 2000 | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
BELIEVES THAT THE CURRENT PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY PROCESS IS ADEQUATE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
BETTER EFFICIENCY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
BETTER [RODUCT& FASTER SPEED OF PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
BUSINESS DID NOT WARRANT INVESTMENT IN NEW TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
BUSINESS IS DULL | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
BUSINESS IS VERY LOW | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
BUSSINESS HAS GONE DOWN | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
CAN NOT AFFORD BECAUSE BUSSINESS IS VERY LOW | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
CAPACITY EXPANSION/QUALITY IMPROVEMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
CHANGE IN TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
COFFEE PRODUCTION IS VERY DEPRESSD. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
COMPETITION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
COMPUTERIZATION FOR INFORMATION. MANAGEMENT INCREASE OUTP | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
COPE WITH INCREASING DEMAND FOR HIGH PRODUCTIVITY AND | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
COSTLY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
COULD NOT AFFORD | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
CREATE AN EDGE OVER COMPETITORS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
DO NOT WANT TO BE LEFT BEHIND | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
DUE TO CHANGES IN THE PRODUCTION SYSTEM | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
DUE TO CHANGES OF RAW MATERIAL | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
ECONOMICALLY - NOT THE BEST OF TIMES TO INVEST IN ANY NEW TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
EFFECIENCY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
EFFICIENCY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
EFFICIENCY IN PRODUCTIVITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
ENHANCE PRODUCTION | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
EXISTING TECHNOLOGY IS ADEQUATE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
EXPANSION | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
EXPANSION AND COST SHARING | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
EXPANSION COSTS REDUCTIONS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
EXPECTATION OF MORE ORDER | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
EXPENSIVE TO ACQUIRE | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
FACED A CHALLENGE TO EXPLORE INTO NEW ARES WITH AN AIM OF | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FINANCE LIMITATIONS HAVE NOT ALLOWED THE FIRM TO INVEST NEW TECHNOLOGY. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FINANCIAL HARDSHIP | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FOR BETTER PRODUCTION PROCESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FOR COST EFFECTIVENESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FOR COST SAVING PURPOSES | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
FOR EFFICIENCY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FOR EFFICIENT ADMINISTRATION AND STREAMLINED OPERATIONS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FOR EFFICIENT PRODUCTION PRCESSES | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FOR EFFICIENT PRODUCTION PROCESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FOR EXPLANATION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FOR GROWTH | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FOR IMPROVED EFFICIECY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FOR MODERN TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
GET A NEW PRODUCT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
GOING DOWN & TECHNOLOGY HAS NOT CHANGED | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
HAD NO MONEY DUE TO HARD FINANCIAL TIMES | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
HAD NO MONEY TO DO SO DUE TO DECLINING ECONOMY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
HANDMADE PRODUCTS BUT COMPUTERIZED 10 YEARS AGO BUT ONLY FOR ACCOUNTS. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
HIGH COST OF PRODUCTION; COMPETITION THE SAME LEVEL WITH COMPETITION. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE COMMUNICATION & COST CUTTING | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE IN QUALITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE INFORMATION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE PRODUCTION OF WHEAT FLOUR | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE PRODUCTION QUALITY & QUANTITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE PRODUCTIVITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE PRODUCTS QUALITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE QUALITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE QUALITY AND QAUNTITY AS WELL AS IMPROVE NEW PRODU | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE THE LEVEL OF TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVE THE PRODUCTION PROCESS REGULARLY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVED INEFFIENCY & QUALITY OF PRODUCTS. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IMPROVEMENT OF PRODUCT QUALITY TECHNOLOGY WAS OLD | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
INCREASE CAPACITY OF THE COMPANY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
INCREASE CAPACITY UTILIZATION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
INCREASE EFFICIECY AND PRODUCTIVITY OF THE BUSINESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
INCREASE EFFICIENCY PRODUCTIVITY AND REDUCE COST OF PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
INCREASE PRODUCT DIVERSIFICATION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
INCREASE PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY & QUALITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
INVESTMENT CLIMATE/COMPETITION FROM IMPORTED GOODS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
INVESTMENT IS NOT VIABLE. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IPMROVE SERVICES | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IT NECESSIATED BY THE PRODUCTION PROCESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
IT WAS REQUIRED BY THE MARKET CONDITION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
ITS EXPENSIVE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
JUST COME FROM RECEIVERSHIP UNCERTAINITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
LACK OF ADEQUATE FINANCE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
LACK OF CAPITAL, WOULD WISH TO HAVE GOOD MACHINES TO PUT THE SILENCERS PROPERLY. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
LACK OF FINANCE | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
LACK OF FINANCES | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
LACK OF FINANCES DUE TO LOW SALES AND POOR BUSINESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
LACK OF FUNDS | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
LACK OF MONEY | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
LACK OF MONEY TO INVEST DUE TO LIMITED MARKET CAUSED BY HIGH LEVEL OF COMPETITIO | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
LACK OF MONEY TO UNDERTAKE THE TASK | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
LIBERALIZATION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
LIMITATION OF RAW MATERIALS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
LOW BUSSINESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
LOWER COST OF PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
MAKING WORK EASIER | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
MARKET CONDITIONS UNFAVOURABLE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
MARKET SMALL FOR THE LINE OF BUSINESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
MEET CONSUMER NEEDS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
MEET EXPORT DEMAND MARKET IN EUROPE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
MODERNISE PRODUCTION SYSTEM | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
MORDERNIZE SERVICE WORKSHOP | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NECESSIATED BY THE MARKET AND INTRODUCTION OF NEW PRODUCTS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NEW TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NEW TYPE OF GOODS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NO BUSINESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NO BUSSINESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NO CAPACITY FOR EXPANSION TO USE NEW TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NO GROWTH IN BUSINESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NO INCENTIVES TO INVEST | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NO INVESTMENT BECAUSE OF FUNDING WHICH IS EXPENSIVE AND NOT VIABLE FOR THE FIRM | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NO MONEY FOR INVESTMENT IN NEW TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NO MUCH PROFIT/LACK OF FINANCE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NO NEED FOR VAST TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NO NEW WORK ECONOMY DECLINING | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
NON-AVALABILITY of PACKAGING MATERIALS LOCALLY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
OLD MACHINES HAS NO SPARE PARTS.(MORE EFFICIENT) | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
POOR BUSINESS OPERATING ENVIRONMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
POOR BUSSINESS ENVIRONMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
POOR ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE IN THE ECONOMY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
PROGRESS OF BUSINESS IS NOT AS ANTICIPATED | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
RE-INVESTMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
REDUCE INPUT ON ENVIRONMENT IN MATERIAL RESOURCE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
REDUCE PRODUCTION COST | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
REDUCE THE NUMBER OF WORKERS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
REPLACEMENT OF OLD EQUIPMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
SAME PRINCIPLES STILL HOLD | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
SAME PRODUCT LINE DIFFERENTIATION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
SAVE FUEL BY RECAPURATION OF WASTE HEAT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
SHRIKING MARKET AND HENCE NO POTENTIAL. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
STREAMLINE OPERATION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TAKE CARE OF EAST AFRICA COMMUNITY MARKET | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TECHNOLOGY CHANGES TOO FAST | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TEXTILE INDUSTRY HAS BEEN DOING BAD,NO FUTURE CERTAINTY & TECHNOLOGY IS EXPENSIV | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TEXTILESM DUTIES SUSPENDED DUE TO ILLEGAL IMPORTATION OF FABRICS SECOND HAND GA | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THE BUSINESS IS DOWN | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THE COMPANY IS NEW | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THE CURRENT TECHNOLOGY IS ADEQUATE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THE CURRENT TECHNOLOGY IS RELATIVELY NEW & ADEQUATE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THE ECONOMY HAS BEEN VERY POOR FOR ANY INVESMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THE EXISTING TECHNOLOGY IS ADEQUATE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THE FIRM IS ONLY ONE MONTH OLD,USING THE SOME TECHNOLOGY IT HAD BEFORE CLOSING D | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THE FIRM STARTED OPRATION ON YEAR 2002 | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THE NATURE OF WORK NEEDS HUMAN SKILLS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THE ONLY WAY TO KEEP THE COMPANY FOR FUTURE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THE PRODUCTION SYSTEM HAS BEEN EFFICIENT WITH EXISTING TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THEIR PRODUCTS HAVE NOT CHANGED TO THE EXTENT THAT REQUIRE NEW TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THERE HAS BE NO GROWTH IN FACTORY DUE TO POOR STATUS OF THE ECONOMY. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THERE IS NO BUSINESS, INVESTMENT CANNOT BE SUSTAINED | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THERE IS NO WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY IN WOOD SECTOR DUE TO CLOSURE OF FORESTS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
THEY ARE EXPENSIVE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO ACHIEVE BETTER QUALITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO ACHIEVE HIGHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AND LEVERAGE ON BREAK-AWAY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO ALLOW NEW PACKAGING PRODUCTS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO BE ABLE TO COMPETE IN INDUSTRY THEREFORE NEED TO UPDATE. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO BE ABLE TO COMPETE IN THE MARKET | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO BE ABLE TO COPE WITH THE HIGH LEVEL OF COMPETITION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO BE ABLE TO DEVELOP NEW PRODUCTS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO BE COMPETITIVE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO BE THE MARKET LEADER | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO BETTER MANAGE THE BUSSINESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO COMPETE IN THE MARKET | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO CONFORM WITH ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS, TO INCREASE EFFICIENCY, TO PRODUCE HIGH | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO COPE WITH CHANGES IN THE INDUSTRY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO ENHANCE BETTER BUSINESS PROCESS & QUALITY OF INFORMATION FOR BETTER DECISION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO ENHANCE EFFECIENCY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO ENHANCE EFFICIENCY | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
TO ENHANCE EFFICIENCY & IMPROVE ON QUALITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO ENHANCE PRODUCTION AND QUALITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO EXPAND PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO HAVE A NEW VENTURE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPORT PRODUCTIVE PROCESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY | 7 |
2.6%
|
|
TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY AND COMPETETIVENESS IN SERVICE DELIEVERY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY IN PRODUCTION. HIGH SPEED MACHINE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY, COST CONTROL | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE MANUFACTURING AND LOWER COST. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE ON EFFICIENCY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE OUR PRODUCTS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE PACKAGING | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE PRODUCT QUALITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE PRODUCTIVITY & REMAIN AHEAD OF DEVELOPMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE QUALITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE QUALITY & PRODUCTIVITY | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
TO IMPROVE QUALITY OF PRODUCTS & PRODUCTIVITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE THE INFRASTRUCTURAL AND OTHER FACILITIES IN THE ESTABLISHMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE THE PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE THE PRODUCTION PROCESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE THE PRODUCTION PROCESSES | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE THE PRODUCTION SYSTEM | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO INCREASE CAPACITY AND ENHANCE QUALITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO INCREASE EFFICIENCY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO INCREASE EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCT QUALITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO INCREASE EFFICIENY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO INCREASE PRODUCTION TO SATISFY MARKET | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
TO INCREASE THE QUALITY OF THE PAPER USED FOR PACKAGING | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO INTRODUCE NEW PRODUCTS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IPMROVE ON THE EFFIENCY OF MACHINES. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO IPROVE HIS PRODUCTS IN TERM OF STANDARD | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO KEEP PACE WITH THE MARKET DEMAND | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO KEEP THE PRODUCTION PROCESS EFFICIENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO KEEP UP THE CUSTOMERS EXPECTATIONS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO KEEP UP WITH MODERN WAY OF BUSSINESS. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO KEEP UP WITH TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO KEEP UP WITH THE MARKET | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
TO KEEP UP WITH THE MARKET DEMAND | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO KEEP UP WITH THE QUALITY OF PRODUCTS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO LOWER COST OF PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO MAINTAIN MARKET LEADERSHIP | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO MAINTAIN THE MARKET LEADERSHIP IN SOFT DRINKS IN KENYA | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO MAKE THE PRODUCTION PROCESS MORE EFFICIENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO MAKE THE WORK EASIER | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO MANUFACTURE NEW PRODUCTS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO MEET CONSUMER DEMANDS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO MEET INTERNATIONAL QUALITY STANDARDS & CHANGING CONSUMER NEEDS. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO MEET THE RAPIDLY CHANGING DEMAND | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO PERFECT THE OPERATION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO PERFECT THE PRODUCT PROCESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO PRODUCE QUALITY PRODUCTS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO REMAIN COMPETATIVE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO SATISFY THE BROWN SUGAR MARKET | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TO SAVE ENERGY HENCE REDUCE COST & INCREASE PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TOM IMPROVE BUSSINESS | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TOM KEEPABREAST WITH LATEST TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
TYPE OF BUSINESS DOES NOT REQUIRE NEW TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
UNCERTAINITY ABOUT FUTURE | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
UNCERTAINTY ABOUT POLITICAL TRANSITION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
UPGRADE LABORATORY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
UPGRADE OLD MACHINERY & IMPROVE EFFICIENCY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
UPGRADE PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
USE OF COMPUTERS TO IMPROVE ON QUALITY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
WAS NOT NECESSARY | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
WATER CONSERVATION | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
WEAK DEMAND | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
WORK IMPROVEMENT, QUALITY IMPROVEMENT | 1 |
0.4%
|
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.