Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
BETTER TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
COST REDUCTION | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
COST SAVING/NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENTY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
CTS. | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
DEMAND ON THEIR PRODUCTS WAS LOW. | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
DIVERSIFY PRODUCTION | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
ECONOMY IS BAD SO NO NEED TO INVEST | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
EXPENSIVE TO INVEST IN NEW TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
FRUSTRATIONS OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
GOVERNMENT POLICY OF EMPLOYMENT | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
HIGH QUALITY OF PRODUCTS. | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
HIGH TAXATION | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
IMPROVE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
IMPROVE ON PACKAGING | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
IMPROVE ON QUALITY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
IMPROVE QUALITY OF PRODUCTS TO MAKE THEM MORE COMPETITIVE | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
IMPROVING PRODUCTS | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
INCREASE PRODUCTION | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
INCREASE PRODUCTION & CAPACITY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
MARKET FOR THE PRODUCT SMALL | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
NO INCENTIVES TO INVEST AND NO RESORCES TO DO SO. | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
NO MONEY FOR INVESTMENT IN NEW TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
NON AVAILABILITY OF PACKAGING MATERIALS LOCALLY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
PRODUCTIVITY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
PROGRAMMING | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
TO ICREASE PRODUTION | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
TO IMPROVE ON THE QUALITY OF PRODUCTS. | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
TO IMPROVE PRODUCTION PROCESS | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
TO IMPROVE PRODUCTS QUALITY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
TO UPGRADE OPERATIONS | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
TOWELING TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
UT INCREASE QUALITY | 1 |
3.1%
|
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.