National Panel Survey 2008-2009, Wave 1
Tanzania, 2008 - 2009
Get Microdata
Reference ID
TZA_2008_NPS-R1_v03_M
Producer(s)
National Bureau of Statistics
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Mar 23, 2011
Last modified
Apr 14, 2020
Page views
304716
Downloads
31930
- Data files
- SEC_A_T_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_B_C_D_E1_F_G1_U_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_E2_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_G2_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_H1_J_K2_O2_P1_Q1_S1_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_H2_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_H3_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_I_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_K1_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_L_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_M_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_N_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_O1_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_O3_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_P2_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_Q2_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_Q3_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_R_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_S2_Swahili_Labels
-
Agriculture
SEC_1_ALL_Swahili_Labels - SEC_2A_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_2B_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_3A_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_3B_Swahili_Labels
- SEC_4A_Swahili_Labels
- nps_weights_oct2010
- HH.Geovariables_Y1
- SECTA1A2_Swahili_Labels
- SECTCB_Swahili_Labels
- SECTCEFG
- SECTCH
- SECTCI
- SECTCJ_S
- SEC_A_T_English_Labels
- SEC_B_C_D_E1_F_G1_U_English_Labels
- SEC_E2_English_Labels
- SEC_G2_English_Labels
- SEC_H1_J_K2_O2_P1_Q1_S1_English_Labels
- SEC_H2_English_Labels
- SEC_H3_English_Labels
- SEC_I_English_Labels
- SEC_L_English_Labels
- SEC_M_English_Labels
- SEC_N_English_Labels
- SEC_O1_English_Labels
- SEC_O3_English_Labels
- SEC_P2_English_Labels
- SEC_Q2_English_Labels
- SEC_Q3_English_Labels
- SEC_R_English_Labels
- SEC_S2_English_Labels
- SEC_2A_English_Labels
- SEC_2B_English_Labels
- SEC_3A_English_Labels
- SEC_3B_English_Labels
- SEC_4A_English_Labels
- SECTA1A2_English_Labels
- SECTCB
- SECTCC
- SECTCD
- TZY1.HH.Consumption
1.REGION (region)
Data file: SECTCI
Overview
Valid:
406
Invalid:
1
Minimum:
1
Maximum:
55
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
11
End:
12
Width:
2
Range:
1 - 55
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dodoma | 11 |
2.7%
|
| 2 | Arusha | 13 |
3.2%
|
| 3 | Kilimanjaro | 13 |
3.2%
|
| 4 | Tanga | 14 |
3.4%
|
| 5 | Morogoro | 14 |
3.4%
|
| 6 | Pwani | 8 |
2%
|
| 7 | Dar es Salaam | 69 |
17%
|
| 8 | Lindi | 19 |
4.7%
|
| 9 | Mtwara | 25 |
6.2%
|
| 10 | Ruvuma | 17 |
4.2%
|
| 11 | Iringa | 16 |
3.9%
|
| 12 | Mbeya | 19 |
4.7%
|
| 13 | Singida | 7 |
1.7%
|
| 14 | Tabora | 14 |
3.4%
|
| 15 | Rukwa | 11 |
2.7%
|
| 16 | Kigoma | 13 |
3.2%
|
| 17 | Shinyanga | 17 |
4.2%
|
| 18 | Kagera | 15 |
3.7%
|
| 19 | Mwanza | 16 |
3.9%
|
| 20 | Mara | 7 |
1.7%
|
| 21 | Manyara | 10 |
2.5%
|
| 51 | Kaskazini Unguja | 8 |
2%
|
| 52 | Kusini Unguja | 4 |
1%
|
| 53 | Mjini Magharibi | 25 |
6.2%
|
| 54 | Kaskazini Pemba | 10 |
2.5%
|
| 55 | Kusini Pemba | 11 |
2.7%
|
| Sysmiss | 1 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.