DDI_BGD_2009_CELS_v01_M2011-04-25NADACitizen's Experiences of the Legal System 2009CELS 2009BGD_2009_CELS_v01_MMitra and Associates, and The World Bank
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS)
NADAWorld BankOther Household Survey [hh/oth]The survey focuses upon citizens' experiences of civil wrongs and criminal offences and their use of formal and informal dispute resolution mechanisms to obtain redress.
BACKGROUND
The World Bank began its engagement on legal and judicial reform in Bangladesh with the Legal and Judicial Capacity Building Project (the project commenced in 2001 and has been extended until December 2008), a Government strategy supporting the reform agenda in this package was adopted in 2000. The project was a product of its time, and focused on a series of technocratic reforms to the civil justice system (improving the commercial legal framework, increasing court efficiency (strengthening court administration, improving case management, strengthening judicial training), upgrading infrastructure and facilities, establishing capacity in law reform and legal drafting, and attempting to establish and support a legal aid framework.).
The last decade has seen a significant evolution in the Bank's approach to the overall governance agenda in its client countries. It has also witnessed a broadening of the Bank's agenda to “demand side” interventions and pro-poor justice, and a new interpretation of the Articles of Agreement which comprehends that working on criminal justice and human rights is within the Bank's mandate. Since the 2000/2001 World Development Report, the Bank has adopted a definition of poverty that incorporates vulnerability, exposure to risk, voicelessness and powerlessness, seeing poverty as multi-dimensional -- the absence of “fundamental freedoms of action and choice”. So, the poverty reduction aspiration is logically also one which incorporates the notion of increasing human security and individual dignity/reducing vulnerability. The Articles of Association were interpreted to comprehend criminal justice and human rights issues as within the Bank's mandate in separate legal opinions of the General Counsel in early 2006.
At the same time, there has been a shift in the Government's stated policy priorities to reform of the criminal justice sector and enhancing affordable justice for the poor. The PRSP of 2005-8 proposes a number of institutional reforms in the justice sector (embracing the judiciary, police, public prosecution system and prison reform) as well as initiatives to increase access to justice, develop informal mechanisms of dispute resolution, and meaningful progress on the separation of the judiciary from the executive. Only the last of these matters has been the subject of significant progress, one of the governance reforms introduced by the Caretaker Government during 2007.
Other donors in Bangladesh have shifted their attention to a number of interventions relating to access to justice for the poor, after limited success with the formal institutions involved in the administration of justice. In fact, reform of legal institutions has met with scant success anywhere in the world. A World Bank assessment concluded that “less overall progress has been made in judicial reform and strengthening than in almost any other area of policy or institutional reform: James H. Anderson, David S. Bernstein and Cheryl W. Gray, Judicial Systems in Transition Economies: Assessing the Past, Looking to the Future (Washington DC, World Bank, 2005).
When the existing project concludes at the end of 2008, the Bank is interested in designing a new intervention in this field. However, there needs to be a greater evidence base about the existing state of play before preparatory work on a new project can begin. While a literature review reveals a multitude of analyses of Bangladesh's legal system, much of this material is doctrinal, with little empirical work and practically no work which engages with the political economy of institutional reform. Few initiatives have been informed by hard analysis of the day to day experiences of citizens in dealing with civil and criminal wrongs on the one hand and the embedded political, economic and cultural incentives that surround institutional change on the other.
What is proposed is a set of empirical investigations that is closely tailored to the initial literature review's findings. A survey would provide insights into the dispute resolution experiences and needs of the bulk of citizens in the country. Qualitative work would probe the current institutional responses (both formal and informal) - how the institutions operate and why, the incentive structures within, the dynamics of institutional change. Through the results of this work, the Bank will be better equipped to put the two parts of the puzzle together (basic institutional reform and ensuring that the poor are benefited) in planning any future interventions.
RATIONALE
The rationale for the survey lies in the paucity of robust data regarding citizens' experience of civil wrongs and crime and about their experiences and perceptions of formal and informal institutions involved in dispute resolution (including NGO service-providers). As is the case in many developing countries, official statistics cannot be relied upon, due to the chronic under-reporting of crime - in fact, some countries undertake or use crime victimisation surveys in the absence of any other reliable basis upon which to develop public policy in this area. The existing record-keeping practices of NGO service-providers often catalogue numbers of cases processed but fail to disaggregate this data or to collect meaningful statistics about the incidence of crimes and civil wrongs more generally. Thus, this survey could establish a baseline for monitoring purposes that could be repeated in coming years.
After sifting through the existing empirical work, several recent surveys stand out as worthwhile background. Survey work on dispute resolution and legal systems tends to be folded into larger “high-end” governance surveys. This genre of surveys usefully outlines the dimensions of governance problems in Bangladesh including, at a general level, the relationship of institutions that enforce laws and resolve disputes. Three surveys more specifically probe law and order and human security issues, one of which is being finalized at the present time. Another survey draws on the data bases of four prominent legal aid NGOs to provide a profile of perceptions of beneficiaries of the services of those NGOs. And another probes public opinion more broadly with respect to alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.
Collectively, the existing surveys are useful; they provide glimpses into the institutional pathologies of law enforcement and dispute resolution from a citizen's perspective and potential policy prescriptions and programmatic interventions. But they have certain limitations for the purposes of examining very broadly the contours of dispute resolution at informal and formal levels, the enforcement of norms, and citizens' behaviour in response to the civil and criminal wrongs that increase their vulnerability and reduce control and predictability over their lives:
(i) a narrow topical focus;
(ii) the sample size is insufficient to show regional differentiation, that could be expected to be substantial;
(iii) the sample pool is bounded geographically and by beneficiaries of on-going NGO programs;
(iv) the surveys potentially have a bias toward empirically justifying an on-going activity; and/or
(v) donor pressure in terms of time frame and methodology employed.
Finally, a lot of the social change in Bangladesh over the last three decades is not adequately documented in the scholarship on the justice-poverty nexus. It thus does not capture the effects of increased urbanization, the breakdown in the authority of traditional mediators (and thus presumably compliance with the outcomes of traditional dispute resolution) as well as the penetration of partisan political patronage into the fabric of collective social life down to the village level in the period since 1991. Recent years have also witnessed the growth in the variety of dispute resolution fora available to parts of the population, especially with the rise of community legal service providers. The latter term refers to NGOs, which in the Bangladesh context provide a variety of dispute resolution services in addition to assisting clients with legal advice and representation in the courts where appropriate.
OBJECTIVES
The broad objectives of the survey have been identified through the literature review and are designed to supplement existing knowledge:
A. To provide a national and regionally representative profile of civil disputes and crimes and their impacts, by gathering data on:
i. Reported personal and household experience of civil disputes and crimes: type, frequency, severity
ii. Community security and social cohesion profile: knowledge of civil disputes and crimes in the locality (type, frequency, severity) as well as social harmony (trust, confidence, collective action, feeling of safety etc.)
iii. Which legal violations (criminal actions, human rights violations and civil wrongs) are the most serious for the average citizen (viz. that reduce to the greatest extent feelings of control over, and predictability in planning, one's life or for which redress is difficult/impossible to obtain.).
iv. Self-help strategies, routine practices for avoiding exposure to civil and criminal wrongs, and the impacts on individual citizens of institutional failure. This includes assessing the impact of chronic conditions of crime and violence on coping strategies and pre-emptive behaviour which may have negative consequences for economic and social well-being. These include risk-averse economic behaviour, incorporation into exploitative social networks or patron-client relationships, violent and other forms of vigilante or retaliatory behaviour. This will enable a fuller assessment of the extent of 'unmet need'.
v. Variations on (a-c) by gender, socioeconomic status, social networks (including patron-client relationships, membership of organizations such as microcredit organizations, exposure to work of legal aid NGOs) and location (division; rural/urban/peri-urban; ecologically fragile/flood-prone).
B. To map the full range of behaviours through which citizens seek redress for perceived wrongs, and their determinants, by gathering data on:
i. Knowledge of various legal institutions and dispute resolution fora.
ii. The civil disputes or crimes for which an institutional response is sought: strategies and patterns of sequencing behaviour to obtain redress.
iii. Determinants of demand: motivations for seeking/avoiding resolution through different fora; which features of a dispute resolution system are valued and by whom?
iv. User experiences of legal institutions and dispute fora: citizens' views on substantive fairness, procedural fairness and enforcement capability.
v. Whether citizens perceive any role for the state in dispute resolution. If so, which are the areas that are perceived as important for state involvement?
vi. Forum shopping (going from one dispute resolution mechanism to another in the absence of a favourable verdict): Variations according to socio-economic and other status will be mapped. For those who choose to use the formal system, the survey will probe the number of fora through which a case has typically passed before it comes before the courts.
C. To assess perceptions of law enforcement, incidence of crime, accountability and rule of law over time, using the recall method. The focus on a two year time frame is to track whether any of the changes in law enforcement and the political environment during the period of the Caretaker Government (ie. a change in the formal rules of the game at national level, post January 2007) have resulted in any meaningful changes to citizens' experiences with the justice system in their daily lives.
i. Experiences of civil disputes and crimes within last two years and at least two years ago
ii. Experiences of formal and informal dispute resolution mechanisms within the last two years and at least two years ago.
iii. Changing patterns of patronage and their impact on informal and extra-legal behaviour of local people of influence (including mastaans, politically sponsored criminal networks etc) within the last two years and atleast 2 years ago.
iv. Perceptions of law and order, accountability, rule of law within the last two years and before.BangladeshSample survey data [ssd]- Household roster (demiographics; basic information on education level)
- Land ownership, Well-being indicators and Social network
- Abuses/crimes/disputes: Threat and risk-avoidance
- Experience of abuses/crimes/disputes: severity as perceived by respondents
- Responses to civil disputes and crime
- General Perception about Justice Systems/Rule of LawThe unit of observation for the survey is the household. Interviews were conducted with an equal number of women and men, each representing their households. Additional purposive sampling was conducted to ensure a representative estimate of ethnic and religious groups as well as communities of ecologically vulnerable areas. The total sample size of the survey was 10710 (257x30) households. However after thorough cleaning, the sample size included in the analysis is 9753 households.
A two stage stratified cluster sampling design was followed. The Integrated Multipurpose Sample (IMPS) design developed by Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) from the Population Census 2001 was the sampling frame used. The IMPS design consists of 1000 Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) throughout the country. A PSU is defined to be a cluster of around 200 households. In the first stage, 357 PSUs (of which 250 were rural and 107 urban) were selected, using a linear systematic sampling scheme. These PSUs were selected from 12 different strata (consisting of rural and urban areas in Bangladesh's six administrative divisions) using proportional allocation. The table below shows the allocation of PSUs to the strata. The households located in these selected PSUs were listed. In the second stage, 30 households from each selected PSU were selected systematically using a random start.
Division: Number of PSUs selected (Total / Rural / Urban)
Barisal: 29 / 22 / 7
Chittagong: 64 / 45 / 19
Dhaka: 102 / 67 / 35
Khulna: 52 / 35 / 17
Rajshahi: 90 / 66 / 24
Sylhet: 20 / 15 / 5
Total: 357 / 250 / 107Face-to-face [f2f]The draft survey questionnaire was pilot-tested to ensure that the concepts presented and the terminology used in the questionnaire could be understood by all respondents; adjustments were made accordingly.Enumerators were trained for several days on the administration of the finalized questionnaire. Following the selection of an individual respondent, the interviewer requested his or her permission to be interviewed. If the individual was unavailable, two follow-up visits were made to the unavailable respondent's address to avoid substitution, during the two days that the survey team was stationed in each selected area.The World Bank Microdata LibraryUse of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
- the Identification of the Primary Investigators and the country
- the title of the survey (including acronym and year of implementation)
- the survey reference number
- the source and date of download
Example:
Mitra and Associates and the World Bank. Survey on the Citizen's Experiences of the Legal System 2009. Ref. BGD_2009_CELS_v01_M. dataset downloaded from http://microdata.worldbank.org on [date]The data are distributed as Public Use Files under the terms of use defined by the World Bank's Microdata Library (http://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/terms-of-use).The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.sec01_02Household Identification and information on head of household taken from the Household Roster975332sec02Household Roster5040615sec03_Q01-Q15Land ownership, Well-being indicators and Social network975337sec03_Q16Section 03 - Question 16252078sec03_Q17-18Section 03 - Questions 17 and 18975310secA_Q05_secB_Q06Section A. Abuses/crimes/disputes: Threat and risk-avoidance - Question 5
Section B. Experience of abuses/crimes/disputes: severity as perceived by respondents - Question 69753229secB_Q07-Q08_secC_Q09-Q14Section B. Experience of abuses/crimes/disputes: severity as perceived by respondents - Questions 7 and 8
Section C. Responses to civil disputes and crime - Questions 9 to 145628479secD_Q15-Q17_secE_Q18-Q19Section D. Applicable for all respondents - Q15 to Q17
Section E. General Perception about Justice Systems/Rule of Law - Q18 and Q19975381secE_Q20Section E. General Perception about Justice Systems/Rule of Law - Q209753018secE_Q21Section E. General Perception about Justice Systems/Rule of Law - Q219753057secE_Q22-Q25Section E. General Perception about Justice Systems/Rule of Law - Q22 to Q25975361summaryThis file contains variables extracted from various data files merged into one file. It does not contain variables that are not available in one of the other files.5628596secA-Q04Section A. Abuses/crimes/disputes: Threat and risk-avoidance - Question Q441128153Household id numberHousehold id numberHousehold id numberHousehold id numberHousehold id number97531001357095Cluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster number97531357Household numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold number97531601Starting time in hourStarting time in hourStarting time in hourStarting time in hourStarting time in hourInterview starting time974766789101112131415161718192021SysmissStarting time in minutesStarting time in minutesStarting time in minutesStarting time in minutesStarting time in minutesInterview starting time9747659Interviewer codeInterviewer codeInterviewer codeInterviewer codeInterviewer code975328125Day of interviewDay of interviewDay of interviewDay of interviewDay of interviewDate of interview9753131Month of interviewMonth of interviewMonth of interviewMonth of interviewMonth of interviewDate of interview97532February3March4AprilYear of interviewYear of interviewYear of interviewYear of interviewYear of interviewDate of interview975392009Respondent line numberRespondent line numberRespondent line numberRespondent line numberRespondent line number9753132Respondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sex97531Male2FemaleDistrict codeDistrict codeDistrict codeDistrict codeDistrict code9753194Upazilla codeUpazilla codeUpazilla codeUpazilla codeUpazilla code9753295How long have you lived in this area (this village/urban ward)?How long have you lived in this area (this village/urban ward)?How long have you lived in this area (this village/urban ward)?How long have you lived in this area (this village/urban ward)?How long have you lived in this area (this village/urban ward)?How long have you lived in this area (this village/urban ward)?Always = 9597421198How long have you lived in this household?How long have you lived in this household?How long have you lived in this household?How long have you lived in this household?How long have you lived in this household?How long have you lived in this household?Always = 9597341999Religion of the respondentReligion of the respondentReligion of the respondentReligion of the respondentReligion of the respondentReligion of the respondent975211Muslim2Hindu3Buddhist4Christian5OthersSysmissEthnicity of the respondentEthnicity of the respondentEthnicity of the respondentEthnicity of the respondentEthnicity of the respondentEthnicity of the respondent975121Bengali2Bihari origin3Tribal4OtherSysmissData entry keyer codeData entry keyer codeData entry keyer codeData entry keyer codeData entry keyer code975312345678101112Total household memberTotal household memberTotal household memberTotal household memberTotal household member9753135Type of sampleType of sampleType of sampleType of sampleType of sample97531Barisal rural2Barisal urban3Ctg rural4Ctg urban5Dhaka rural6Dhaka urban7Khulna rural8Khulna urban9Raj rural10Raj urban11Shylet rural12Shylet urbanType of areaType of areaType of areaType of areaType of area97531Rural2UrbanResult codeResult codeResult codeResult codeResult code97531Interview completed2Interview partially completed (up to household roster)3Interview incompleteHousehold weightHousehold weightHousehold weightHousehold weightHousehold weight97530.02584.756Id of respondentId of respondentId of respondentId of respondentId of respondent975310010235709502Line number of household memberLine number of household memberLine number of household memberLine number of household memberLine number of household member9753132Q2a age (in whole years)Q2a age (in whole years)Q2a age (in whole years)Q2a age (in whole years)Q2a age (in whole years)Age (in whole Years)97531395Q2b sex of household memberQ2b sex of household memberQ2b sex of household memberQ2b sex of household memberQ2b sex of household memberSex97531Male2FemaleQ2c relationship with household headQ2c relationship with household headQ2c relationship with household headQ2c relationship with household headQ2c relationship with household headRelationship with HHH97531Hh head2Spouse3Son/daughter4Son/daughter in law5Parents6Parents-in-law7Brother/sister8Brother/sister-in-law9Other relatives10Grandchildren11Non-relative12Others99MissingQ2d highest level of education in household memberQ2d highest level of education in household memberQ2d highest level of education in household memberQ2d highest level of education in household memberQ2d highest level of education in household memberHighest level of education (in cases of individuals who are more than 5 years old)Individuals who are more than 5 years old9753No education1Education up to class 12Class 23Class 34Class 45Class 56Class 67Class 78Class 89Class 0910Ssc11Hsc12Ba/bcom13Ma/mcom14Phd15Doctor/eng55Religious education only77Diploma/ vocational88Don't know98Undertaken some schooling99MissingQ2e marital status of household memberQ2e marital status of household memberQ2e marital status of household memberQ2e marital status of household memberQ2e marital status of household memberMarital Status (in cases of individuals who are more than 10 years old)Individuals who are more than 10 years old975121Never married2Married3Separated/ deserted4Widow/widower9MissingSysmissQ2f primary occupation of household memberQ2f primary occupation of household memberQ2f primary occupation of household memberQ2f primary occupation of household memberQ2f primary occupation of household memberPrimary occupation (in cases of individuals who are more than 8 years old)975211Farming2Agricultural day labor3Fishing4Poultry and livestock rearing5Non-agricultural day labor6Regular salaried employment in government7Regular salaried employment in business8Self employed9Business owner10Rickshaw/rickshaw van puller11Boatman12Unpaid household work13Servant/ maid14Student15Beggar16Old/ disabled17Unemployed18Driver19Blacksmith/fisherman96Other99MissingSysmissIndividuals who are more than 8 years oldQ2g earn in household memberQ2g earn in household memberQ2g earn in household memberQ2g earn in household memberQ2g earn in household memberDoes s/he earn income?975211Yes2No9MissingSysmissHousehold id numberHousehold id numberHousehold id numberHousehold id numberHousehold id number504061001357095176044.858105069.231Cluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster number494979091357176.026105.104Household numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold number49497909160195.73963.4Line number of household memberLine number of household memberLine number of household memberLine number of household memberLine number of household member494979091303.2972.128Age (in whole years)Age (in whole years)Age (in whole years)Age (in whole years)Age (in whole years)Age (in whole Years)494979099926.28519.414Sex of household memberSex of household memberSex of household memberSex of household memberSex of household memberSex494979091Male2FemaleSysmissRelationship with household headRelationship with household headRelationship with household headRelationship with household headRelationship with household headRelationship with HHH494979091Hh head2Spouse3Son/daughter4Son/daughter in law5Parents6Parents-in-law7Brother/sister8Brother/sister-in-law9Other relatives10Grandchildren11Non-relative12Others99MissingSysmissHighest level of education in household memberHighest level of education in household memberHighest level of education in household memberHighest level of education in household memberHighest level of education in household memberHighest level of education (in cases of individuals who are more than 5 years old)Individuals who are more than 5 years old442306176No education1Education up to class 12Class 23Class 34Class 45Class 56Class 67Class 78Class 89Class 0910Ssc11Hsc12Ba/bcom13Ma/mcom14Phd15Doctor/eng55Religious education only77Diploma/ vocational88Don't know98Undertaken some schooling99MissingSysmissMarital status of household memberMarital status of household memberMarital status of household memberMarital status of household memberMarital status of household memberMarital Status (in cases of individuals who are more than 10 years old)Individuals who are more than 10 years old38244121621Never married2Married3Separated/ deserted4Widow/widower9MissingSysmissPrimary occupation of household memberPrimary occupation of household memberPrimary occupation of household memberPrimary occupation of household memberPrimary occupation of household memberPrimary occupation (in cases of individuals who are more than 8 years old)Individuals who are more than 8 years old4068597211Farming2Agricultural day labor3Fishing4Poultry and livestock rearing5Non-agricultural day labor6Regular salaried employment in government7Regular salaried employment in business8Self employed9Business owner10Rickshaw/rickshaw van puller11Boatman12Unpaid household work13Servant/ maid14Student15Beggar16Old/ disabled17Unemployed18Driver19Blacksmith/fisherman96Other99MissingSysmissEarn in household memberEarn in household memberEarn in household memberEarn in household memberEarn in household memberDoes s/he earn income?4068597211Yes2No9MissingSysmissRespondent line numberRespondent line numberRespondent line numberRespondent line numberRespondent line number4841119951251.8941.428Respondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sex494979091Male2FemaleSysmissHousehold weightHousehold weightHousehold weightHousehold weightHousehold weight494979090.02584.75610.426504061Household IDHousehold IDHousehold IDHousehold IDHousehold ID97531001357095Cluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster number97531357Household numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold number97531601How much land does your household own(homestead)?How much land does your household own(homestead)?How much land does your household own(homestead)?How much land does your household own(homestead)?How much land does your household own(homestead)?How much land does your household own? Homestead
(If there are several households living in the same homestead, the respondent should mention the area of homestead that his/her household owns or has claim to. If there is no land, then write 00)9753100How much land does your household own(cultivable)?How much land does your household own(cultivable)?How much land does your household own(cultivable)?How much land does your household own(cultivable)?How much land does your household own(cultivable)?How much land does your household own? Cultivable
(If there are several households living in the same homestead, the respondent should mention the area of homestead that his/her household owns or has claim to. If there is no land, then write 00)9753125Does your hh own this houseDoes your hh own this houseDoes your hh own this houseDoes your hh own this houseDoes your hh own this houseDoes your HH own this house (that you currently live in)97531Yes2No9What type of latrine does this household use?What type of latrine does this household use?What type of latrine does this household use?What type of latrine does this household use?What type of latrine does this household use?What type of latrine does this household use?97531Open field2Kacha3SanitaryDoes any household member work for a daily wage?Does any household member work for a daily wage?Does any household member work for a daily wage?Does any household member work for a daily wage?Does any household member work for a daily wage?Does any household member work for a daily wage?97531Yes2NoIf answered yes to q3.3, how much does he/she earn daily?If answered yes to q3.3, how much does he/she earn daily?If answered yes to q3.3, how much does he/she earn daily?If answered yes to q3.3, how much does he/she earn daily?If answered yes to q3.3, how much does he/she earn daily?If answered yes to Q3.3, how much does he/she earn daily?289068631Yes2No8Na30324045506064707580909297100106110112115120121125130140150156160170175180190200201210220222225230240250270300350360400408458500800SysmissDo all children ages 6 to 17 go to school?Do all children ages 6 to 17 go to school?Do all children ages 6 to 17 go to school?Do all children ages 6 to 17 go to school?Do all children ages 6 to 17 go to school?Do all children ages 6 to 17 go to school?9753128Does the household own a television set?Does the household own a television set?Does the household own a television set?Does the household own a television set?Does the household own a television set?Does the household own a television set?97531Yes2NoWhat is the main construction material of the walls of the house?What is the main construction material of the walls of the house?What is the main construction material of the walls of the house?What is the main construction material of the walls of the house?What is the main construction material of the walls of the house?What is the main construction material of the walls of the house?97531Hemp/hay/bamboo/mud2Ci sheet/wood3Brick/cement4Others9Does this household have electricity connectionDoes this household have electricity connectionDoes this household have electricity connectionDoes this household have electricity connectionDoes this household have electricity connectionDoes this household have electricity connection?97531Yes2NoDoes the household own any cattle?Does the household own any cattle?Does the household own any cattle?Does the household own any cattle?Does the household own any cattle?Does the household own any cattle?97531Yes2NoDoes the house have a separate kitchen?Does the house have a separate kitchen?Does the house have a separate kitchen?Does the house have a separate kitchen?Does the house have a separate kitchen?Does the house have a separate kitchen?97531Yes2NoHow many rooms does the house have (excluding the ones used for business)?How many rooms does the house have (excluding the ones used for business)?How many rooms does the house have (excluding the ones used for business)?How many rooms does the house have (excluding the ones used for business)?How many rooms does the house have (excluding the ones used for business)?How many rooms does the house have (excluding the ones used for business)?97531234567891099Based on your food consumption (khoraki), how would you rank your household?Based on your food consumption (khoraki), how would you rank your household?Based on your food consumption (khoraki), how would you rank your household?Based on your food consumption (khoraki), how would you rank your household?Based on your food consumption (khoraki), how would you rank your household?Based on your food consumption (khoraki), how would you rank your household?97531Chronic deficiency2Occasional deficiency3Break-even4SurplusAre you [or any of your hh members] a member of a ngo/micro finance institution?Are you [or any of your hh members] a member of a ngo/micro finance institution?Are you [or any of your hh members] a member of a ngo/micro finance institution?Are you [or any of your hh members] a member of a ngo/micro finance institution?Are you [or any of your hh members] a member of a ngo/micro finance institution?Are you [or any of your HH members] a member of a NGO/Micro Finance Institution?97531Yes2NoAre you [or any of your hh members] an active member of a political party?Are you [or any of your hh members] an active member of a political party?Are you [or any of your hh members] an active member of a political party?Are you [or any of your hh members] an active member of a political party?Are you [or any of your hh members] an active member of a political party?Are you [or any of your HH members] an active member of a political party?97531Yes2NoRespondent line numberRespondent line numberRespondent line numberRespondent line numberRespondent line number968964125Respondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sex97531Male2FemaleRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weight97530.02585.126975381597532797539975331297534597531397532469753679753297535975331009753123975349753400(sum) childenunder11(sum) childenunder11(sum) childenunder11(sum) childenunder11(sum) childenunder119753123456781015Household idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold id252071001357095Household numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold number252071601Serial numberSerial numberSerial numberSerial numberSerial numberThink about all the people that you know, have close relationships with and can receive assistance if required. Who do you seek the help of most often? (name top three)25207123Occupation codeOccupation codeOccupation codeOccupation codeOccupation codeThink about all the people that you know, have close relationships with and can receive assistance if required. Who do you seek the help of most often? (name top three) - Occupation2520611Farming (on own and/or others land)2Agricultural day labor or contract labor3Fishing4Poultry and livestock rearing5Non-agricultural day labor or contract labor6Regular salaried employment in government/ngo or other insti7Regular salaried employment in some fixed business establish8Self employed in business/service provision9Business owner using hired labor10Rickshaw/rickshaw van puller11Boatman12Unpaid household work13Servant/ maid14Student15Beggar16Old/ disabled17Unemployed18Driver1996Other9899SysmissEducation codeEducation codeEducation codeEducation codeEducation codeThink about all the people that you know, have close relationships with and can receive assistance if required. Who do you seek the help of most often? (name top three) - Education252052No education1Education up to class 12Education up to class 23Education up to class 34Education up to class 45Education up to class 56Education up to class 67Education up to class 78Education up to class 89Education up to class 910Ssc or equivalent11Hsc or equivalent12University/college graduate (ba/bcom/bsc)13Ma/mcom/msc14Phd1555Religious education only77Diploma/ vocational88Donot know9698Undertaken some schooling but donot know how muchSysmissPolitical affiliationPolitical affiliationPolitical affiliationPolitical affiliationPolitical affiliationThink about all the people that you know, have close relationships with and can receive assistance if required. Who do you seek the help of most often? (name top three) - Political affiliation2520521Yes2No88Donot knowSysmissRelationshipRelationshipRelationshipRelationshipRelationshipThink about all the people that you know, have close relationships with and can receive assistance if required. Who do you seek the help of most often? (name top three) - Relationship2520521Close relative2Distant relative3Non-relativeSysmissWealth statusWealth statusWealth statusWealth statusWealth statusThink about all the people that you know, have close relationships with and can receive assistance if required. Who do you seek the help of most often? (name top three) - Wealth status2520521Higher than respondent2Same as respondent3Lower than respondentSysmissHousehold idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold id97531001357095Cluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster number97531357Household numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold number97531601Use a mobile phoneUse a mobile phoneUse a mobile phoneUse a mobile phoneUse a mobile phoneHow often do you: [Read out options]
Use a mobile phone97531Everyday2A few times a week3Few times a month4Less than once in a month5Never7Donot knowUse a computerUse a computerUse a computerUse a computerUse a computerHow often do you: [Read out options]
Use a computer97531Everyday2A few times a week3Few times a month4Less than once in a month5Never7Donot knowUse the internetUse the internetUse the internetUse the internetUse the internetHow often do you: [Read out options]
Use the internet975211Everyday2A few times a week3Few times a month4Less than once in a month5Never7Donot knowSysmissTravel 10 km or more from the place where you live nowTravel 10 km or more from the place where you live nowTravel 10 km or more from the place where you live nowTravel 10 km or more from the place where you live nowTravel 10 km or more from the place where you live nowHow often do you: [Read out options]
Travel 10 km or more from the place where you live now97531Everyday2A few times a week3Few times a month4Less than once in a month5Never7Donot knowHow often, if at all, do you receive money remittances from friends or relativesHow often, if at all, do you receive money remittances from friends or relativesHow often, if at all, do you receive money remittances from friends or relativesHow often, if at all, do you receive money remittances from friends or relativesHow often, if at all, do you receive money remittances from friends or relativesHow often, if at all, do you receive money remittances from friends or relatives outside of the country?
[Read out options except for don't know option]97521No once abroad1Never2Less than once in a year3At least once in a year4At least once in every six month5At least once in every 3 months6At least once in a monthSysmissRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sex97531Male2FemaleRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weight97530.02585.126Household idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold id40962616551001357095Hh id numberHh id numberHh id numberHh id numberHh id number4112811001357095Cluster noCluster noCluster noCluster noCluster no40962616551357Type of areaType of areaType of areaType of areaType of area4112811Rural2UrbanHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold number40962616551601Problem/abuse/crime/disputeProblem/abuse/crime/disputeProblem/abuse/crime/disputeProblem/abuse/crime/disputeProblem/abuse/crime/dispute409626165547Landlord/tenant disputes411Violence relating to conflicts between political parties412Others421Arrest or detention without any justifiable reason422Harassment by police or rab or joint force423False cases lodged against you for the sake of harassment431Breach of employment contract by employer432Harassment in work environment433Dangerous working conditions434Injury at work441Misleading labelling of agricultural inputs442Selling adulterated food451Unable to recover loan452Not getting loans from banks/ fis despite being fully eligib453Difficulties with contract enforcement454Difficulties in obtaining government permits/licenses461Illegal trading of drugs in immediate environment481Dispute related to selling or buying property from a private482Disputes with neighbours over boundaries483Disputes over land title484Land expropriated by government without compensation for dev485Land grabbing (land taken by government fiat/land taken by p491Dispute involving a divorce/separation492Dispute involving inheritance of land or property4011Harassment by utility service providers4012Harassment by land administration officials4013Harassment by health care facilities/professionalsharassment by health care facilities/professionals4101Payment of or soliciting dowry4102Domestic violence (physical violence by hh members/relatives4103Sexual harassment in public places4104Personal property related theft/burglary4105Robbery4106Mugging4107Extortion4108Kidnapping and ransom4109Violence using firearms41010Murder41011Rape41012Acid violence41013Arson41014Assault by non-family member41015Religious/ethnic violenceSysmissWorried about these abuses/crimes/ disputesWorried about these abuses/crimes/ disputesWorried about these abuses/crimes/ disputesWorried about these abuses/crimes/ disputesWorried about these abuses/crimes/ disputesI would like to know if you have been worried about these abuses/crimes/ disputes happening to you or your HH members [to the interviewer: Please read every option slowly to the respondents and write the appropriate code.]40962616551Very worried2Fairly worried3Not very worried4Not at all worried8Not applicableSysmissReasons for worriedReasons for worriedReasons for worriedReasons for worriedReasons for worriedIf you are worried, then why?886583226231Happened to me or someone living in my household2I have received a credible threat from a potential perpetrat3Personally know someone in this community to whom this happe4Have heard about it happening in this community from news orSysmissReasons for not worriedReasons for not worriedReasons for not worriedReasons for not worriedReasons for not worriedIf you are not worried, then why?320968903135These incidents happened long ago and do not happen any more6Have never heard about it happening in this community7Did not happen to me or someone living in my household8Not applicableSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a12894099921Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a12614100201Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a23054089761Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a24424088391Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a45564067251Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a22804090011Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a29274083541Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a11734101081Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a38994073821Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a39564073251Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a414112401Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a353653759161Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a2204110611Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a434112381Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a174112641Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a76954035861Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a3014109801Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a4684108131Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a2004110811Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a3084109731Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a9194103621Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a1754111061Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a1334111481Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a1234111581Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a104112711Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedDid anything to avoid these threats and worriedHave you done anything to avoid these threats and worries?[Multiple answers admissible]
(To the interviewer: do not prompt. once an interviewee answers, write it as it is and then fill in the appropriate code. Any answer not included in codes, write as others correctly)Those who report being 'fairly' or 'very' worried in questions Q4a40962616551Installed new locks gate2Keep valuables in secured cabinets/place3Discussed your concerns with the person concerned4Gone to the authorities for help in preventing the problem5Kept friends / neighbors informed of potential problem6Went to the police7Went to the up8Consulted a lawyer9Discussed matter with local elites / ngos / media persons10Stopped buying the adulterated product11Keeping contact with youth leaders/mastaans in case support12Accepted the situation13Stopped trading / interacting with the problematic person14Left the job15Left the household16Evicted the tenant17Avoided travelling to risky areas18Avoid leaving the house alone19Avoid travelling during certain time of the day20Avoid carrying valuables while travelling21Made an extra-legal payment or a bribe22Participated in collective action23Attended a public meeting or neighbourhood forum to discuss24Formed a new community group to address local problems25Attended a protest meeting or joined an action group26Bought insurance27Did not do anything99OtherSysmissRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sex40962616551Male2FemaleSysmissRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weight40962616550.02585.126396251150301234Sysmiss395136161451234567Sysmiss40962616551Sysmiss40962616551Sysmiss40962616551Sysmiss40962616551Sysmiss40962616551Sysmiss40962616551Sysmiss40962616551Sysmiss40962616551Sysmiss40962616551Sysmiss40962616551Sysmiss41128123409626165531004096261655123Sysmiss41128113Hh id numberHh id numberHh id numberHh id numberHh id number97531001357095Cluster noCluster noCluster noCluster noCluster no97531357Household numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold number97531601Q5.1 did any of these incidents happen to you or your hh members?Q5.1 did any of these incidents happen to you or your hh members?Q5.1 did any of these incidents happen to you or your hh members?Q5.1 did any of these incidents happen to you or your hh members?Q5.1 did any of these incidents happen to you or your hh members?Did any of these incidents happen to you or your HH members? ( See Q.4.1.1 to Q.4.12, if in Q.4b1 answers are 1 or 2 means any of your household member face this problems/ abuse/ crimes/ disputes or received a credible threat from potential from perpetrator then circle 1 in this question)97531Yes2NoQ5.2 to the interviewer look at q4c and circle the appropriate codeQ5.2 to the interviewer look at q4c and circle the appropriate codeQ5.2 to the interviewer look at q4c and circle the appropriate codeQ5.2 to the interviewer look at q4c and circle the appropriate codeQ5.2 to the interviewer look at q4c and circle the appropriate codeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4c and circle the appropriate code97531The interviewee has taken an action2The interviewee did not take an actionQ5.3 if you have acted in trying to reduce potential threats did your sense of sQ5.3 if you have acted in trying to reduce potential threats did your sense of sQ5.3 if you have acted in trying to reduce potential threats did your sense of sQ5.3 if you have acted in trying to reduce potential threats did your sense of sQ5.3 if you have acted in trying to reduce potential threats did your sense of sIf you have acted in trying to reduce potential threats, did your sense of security improve?729724561Yes2NoSysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_1)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_1)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_1)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_1)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_1)9730231SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t1)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t1)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t1)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t1)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t1)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also664531084741015Line number of victim(q6a1)Line number of victim(q6a1)Line number of victim(q6a1)Line number of victim(q6a1)Line number of victim(q6a1)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )664631071234567891011121314223450525355Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hh566585SysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b1)When did it happen?(q6b1)When did it happen?(q6b1)When did it happen?(q6b1)When did it happen?(q6b1)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)664631071In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_2)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_2)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_2)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_2)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_2)7004274924SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t2)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t2)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t2)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t2)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t2)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also432954244741014Line number of victim(q6a2)Line number of victim(q6a2)Line number of victim(q6a2)Line number of victim(q6a2)Line number of victim(q6a2)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )43295424123456789101219243455Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b2)When did it happen?(q6b2)When did it happen?(q6b2)When did it happen?(q6b2)When did it happen?(q6b2)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)432854251In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_3)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_3)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_3)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_3)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_3)430654473SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t3)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t3)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t3)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t3)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t3)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also267870754741015Line number of victim(q6a3)Line number of victim(q6a3)Line number of victim(q6a3)Line number of victim(q6a3)Line number of victim(q6a3)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )2678707512345678102255Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b3)When did it happen?(q6b3)When did it happen?(q6b3)When did it happen?(q6b3)When did it happen?(q6b3)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)267870751In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_4)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_4)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_4)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_4)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_4)265770964SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t4)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t4)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t4)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t4)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t4)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also162781264741015Line number of victim(q6a4)Line number of victim(q6a4)Line number of victim(q6a4)Line number of victim(q6a4)Line number of victim(q6a4)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )1627812612345678910131655Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hh99SysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b4)When did it happen?(q6b4)When did it happen?(q6b4)When did it happen?(q6b4)When did it happen?(q6b4)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)162781261In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_5)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_5)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_5)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_5)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_5)161781365SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t5)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t5)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t5)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t5)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t5)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also95088034741015Line number of victim(q6a5)Line number of victim(q6a5)Line number of victim(q6a5)Line number of victim(q6a5)Line number of victim(q6a5)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )950880312345678910125155Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b5)When did it happen?(q6b5)When did it happen?(q6b5)When did it happen?(q6b5)When did it happen?(q6b5)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)95088031In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_6)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_6)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_6)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_6)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_6)94788066SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t6)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t6)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t6)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t6)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t6)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also58091734741016Line number of victim(q6a6)Line number of victim(q6a6)Line number of victim(q6a6)Line number of victim(q6a6)Line number of victim(q6a6)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )58091731234567101655Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b6)When did it happen?(q6b6)When did it happen?(q6b6)When did it happen?(q6b6)When did it happen?(q6b6)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)58091731In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_7)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_7)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_7)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_7)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_7)57691777SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t7)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t7)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t7)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t7)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t7)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also33394204741015Line number of victim(q6a7)Line number of victim(q6a7)Line number of victim(q6a7)Line number of victim(q6a7)Line number of victim(q6a7)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )33394201234567855Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b7)When did it happen?(q6b7)When did it happen?(q6b7)When did it happen?(q6b7)When did it happen?(q6b7)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)33394201In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 20025SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_8)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_8)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_8)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_8)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_8)32794268SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t8)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t8)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t8)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t8)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t8)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also117963641041014Line number of victim(q6a8)Line number of victim(q6a8)Line number of victim(q6a8)Line number of victim(q6a8)Line number of victim(q6a8)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )117963612345855Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b8)When did it happen?(q6b8)When did it happen?(q6b8)When did it happen?(q6b8)When did it happen?(q6b8)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)11796361In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_9)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_9)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_9)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_9)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_9)11696379SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t9)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t9)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t9)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t9)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t9)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also83967041041013Line number of victim(q6a9)Line number of victim(q6a9)Line number of victim(q6a9)Line number of victim(q6a9)Line number of victim(q6a9)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )83967012348121555Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b9)When did it happen?(q6b9)When did it happen?(q6b9)When did it happen?(q6b9)When did it happen?(q6b9)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)8396701In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_10)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_10)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_10)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_10)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_10)80967310SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t10)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t10)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t10)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t10)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t10)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also53970041141014Line number of victim(q6a10)Line number of victim(q6a10)Line number of victim(q6a10)Line number of victim(q6a10)Line number of victim(q6a10)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )539700123455Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b10)When did it happen?(q6b10)When did it happen?(q6b10)When did it happen?(q6b10)When did it happen?(q6b10)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)5397001In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_11)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_11)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_11)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_11)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_11)52970111SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t11)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t11)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t11)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t11)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t11)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also33972041141015Line number of victim(q6a11)Line number of victim(q6a11)Line number of victim(q6a11)Line number of victim(q6a11)Line number of victim(q6a11)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )3397201241255Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b11)When did it happen?(q6b11)When did it happen?(q6b11)When did it happen?(q6b11)When did it happen?(q6b11)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)3397201In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_12)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_12)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_12)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_12)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_12)32972112SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t12)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t12)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t12)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t12)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t12)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also18973541141010Line number of victim(q6a12)Line number of victim(q6a12)Line number of victim(q6a12)Line number of victim(q6a12)Line number of victim(q6a12)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )18973512355Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b12)When did it happen?(q6b12)When did it happen?(q6b12)When did it happen?(q6b12)When did it happen?(q6b12)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)1897351In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_13)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_13)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_13)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_13)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_13)18973513SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t13)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t13)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t13)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t13)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t13)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also9974448141013Line number of victim(q6a13)Line number of victim(q6a13)Line number of victim(q6a13)Line number of victim(q6a13)Line number of victim(q6a13)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )9974412455Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b13)When did it happen?(q6b13)When did it happen?(q6b13)When did it happen?(q6b13)When did it happen?(q6b13)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)997441In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_14)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_14)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_14)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_14)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_14)9974414SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t14)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t14)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t14)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t14)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t14)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also6974741241014Line number of victim(q6a14)Line number of victim(q6a14)Line number of victim(q6a14)Line number of victim(q6a14)Line number of victim(q6a14)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )69747155Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b14)When did it happen?(q6b14)When did it happen?(q6b14)When did it happen?(q6b14)When did it happen?(q6b14)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)697471In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissSerial number of q6 (q6sl_15)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_15)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_15)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_15)Serial number of q6 (q6sl_15)5974815SysmissProblem/dispute/crime (q6t15)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t15)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t15)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t15)Problem/dispute/crime (q6t15)Problem/dispute/crimeTo the interviewer: Look at Q4.1.1 to Q4.12. (write the codes from Q4 if the codes for Q4b are 1 or 2) * the HH members who do not reside in the HH now, but were HH members when a victimization took place, include those incidents also29751484492SysmissLine number of victim(q6a15)Line number of victim(q6a15)Line number of victim(q6a15)Line number of victim(q6a15)Line number of victim(q6a15)Who is the victim? (enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00 )29751155Whole hh 00 victim does not live in the hhSysmissWhen did it happen?(q6b15)When did it happen?(q6b15)When did it happen?(q6b15)When did it happen?(q6b15)When did it happen?(q6b15)When did it happen?
1= In 2009
2=within last two years (2007-2008)
3= at least two years ago and within last 7 years (2002-2006)
4=at least 7 years ago (before 2002)297511In 20092Within last two years 2007-20083At least two years ago and within last 7 years 2002-20064At least 7 years ago before 2002SysmissThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhIf the interviewee or his/her HH members experienced more than one incident in last 7 years (from 2002 until now), then write about the most serious incident affecting the interviewer and the HH [write the code from Q6]562841254741015Q7.1 number of perpetratorsQ7.1 number of perpetratorsQ7.1 number of perpetratorsQ7.1 number of perpetratorsQ7.1 number of perpetratorsNow we would like to know about the perpetrators/law breakers [of the most serious incident]Number of perpetrators[if the respondent does not know, put 88, if institution is a perpetrator, then write 77]5646410799Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Now we would like to know about the perpetrators/law breakers [of the most serious incident]Did you know main perpetrator (or the person responsible for the incident) before the incident took place?If 2 or 8 >> goto Q8561941341Yes2No8Not appliacbleSysmissQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youNow we would like to know about the perpetrators/law breakers [of the most serious incident]If the main perpetrator is known, then what is his/her relationship to you (the victim)?344863051Own hh member or members2Close relatives3Distant relatives/other household member or members4Unknown but a familiar person seen in your area5Known person from your area6Member of a gang7Government999OthersSysmissQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorNow we would like to know about the perpetrators/law breakers [of the most serious incident]Sex344863051Male2Female8Not applicableSysmissQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorNow we would like to know about the perpetrators/law breakers [of the most serious incident]Age (approximate)34486305299Q7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorQ7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorQ7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorQ7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorQ7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorSocial category of perpetrator
a. Wealth status344863051Higher than respondent2Same as respondent3Lower than respondent7Dont knowSysmissQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorSocial category of perpetrator
b. Political affiliation (two codes apply)344863051Active supporter/cadre of ruling party2Active supporter/cadre of opposition3Not known to be affiliated7Dont knowSysmissQ8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?Q8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?Q8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?Q8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?Q8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?During the incident, did any damage to your HH's property take place?564641071Yes2NoSysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)36706083123456789103555SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)76967712345678917SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)1297411234578SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5974816SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)9753SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)9753SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)9753SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)9753SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)9753SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)9753SysmissQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY97531Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damage (in equivalent taka)3691606210099999998What was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedwhat was your/ your HH's monthly income when your property damaged.3691606297300000Did this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?9753No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?4429311No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?4989255No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?219732No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?109743No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?329721No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?799674No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?3249429No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?7119042No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?169737No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?4059348No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?1969557No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?3899364No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]?7938960No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]32694271Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherSysmissWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]340463491Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherSysmissWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]51592381Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherSysmissWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]11196421Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherSysmissWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]3997141Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherSysmissWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]7396801Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherSysmissRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sex97531Male2FemaleRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weight97530.02585.12697531975319753197531975319753197531975319753197531975319753197531975397539753297531975319753197531975319753197531975319753197531975319753197531975319753975339753197531975319753197531975319753197531975319753197531975319753197531975319753497531975319753197531975319753197531975319753197531975319753197539753975397535975319753297533975349753597536975379753897539975310975311975312975313975314975315975316975317975318975319975320975321975322975323975324975325975326975327975328975329975330975331975332975333975334975335975336975337975338975339975340348662671234567Sysmiss97531344863051235679SysmissHousehold idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold id56281020357095Cluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster number56281357Household numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold number56281601The most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hh56284741015Q7.1 number of perpetratorsQ7.1 number of perpetratorsQ7.1 number of perpetratorsQ7.1 number of perpetratorsQ7.1 number of perpetratorsNow we would like to know about the perpetrators/law breakers [of the most serious incident]Number of perpetrators
[if the respondent does not know, put 88, if institution is a perpetrator, then write 77]5628199Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Did you know main perpetrator (or the person responsible for the incident) before the incident took place?5610181Yes2No8Not appliacbleSysmissQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youIf the main perpetrator is known, then what is his/her relationship to you (the victim)?If 2 or 8 > goto Q8344821801Own hh member or members2Close relatives3Distant relatives/other household member or members4Unknown but a familiar person seen in your area5Known person from your area6Member of a gang7Government999OthersSysmissQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorSex344821801Male2Female8Not applicableSysmissQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorAge (approximate)34482180299Q7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorQ7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorQ7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorQ7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorQ7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorSocial category of perpetrator
a. Wealth status344821801Higher than respondent2Same as respondent3Lower than respondent7Dont knowSysmissQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorSocial category of perpetrator
b. Political affiliation (two codes apply)344821801Active supporter/cadre of ruling party2Active supporter/cadre of opposition3Not known to be affiliated7Dont knowSysmissQ8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?Q8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?Q8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?Q8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?Q8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?What were the consequences of this incident for you/your HH? [most serious one as identified by the respondent] ( Code all that apply)56281Yes2NoLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)36701958123456789103555SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)76555212345678917SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)1256161234578SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5562316SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5628SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5628SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5628SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5628SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5628SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5628SysmissQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damage (in equivalent taka)3691193710099999998What was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your HH's monthly income when your property damaged.369119379790000Did this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]56281Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]56281Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]56281Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]56281Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]56281Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]56281Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherActed alone or with help of family member (q9.1.1)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.1)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.1)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.1)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.1)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?5628911Talked to the perpetrator/other sideQ9.1.1a whether talked to the perpetrator/other sideQ9.1.1a whether talked to the perpetrator/other sideQ9.1.1a whether talked to the perpetrator/other sideQ9.1.1a whether talked to the perpetrator/other sideQ9.1.1a whether talked to the perpetrator/other sideTalked to the perpetrator/other side56281Yes2No9Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.2)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.2)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.2)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.2)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.2)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?5628912Sought help from own family membersQ9.1.2a whether sought help from own family membersQ9.1.2a whether sought help from own family membersQ9.1.2a whether sought help from own family membersQ9.1.2a whether sought help from own family membersQ9.1.2a whether sought help from own family membersSought help from own family members56281Yes2NoActed alone or with help of family member (q9.1.3)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.3)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.3)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.3)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.3)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?5628913Threatened the perpetratorQ9.1.3a threatened the perpetratorQ9.1.3a threatened the perpetratorQ9.1.3a threatened the perpetratorQ9.1.3a threatened the perpetratorQ9.1.3a threatened the perpetratorThreatened the perpetrator56281Yes2NoActed alone or with help of family member (q9.1.4)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.4)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.4)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.4)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.4)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?5628914Took direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her pQ9.1.4a whether took direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her propeQ9.1.4a whether took direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her propeQ9.1.4a whether took direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her propeQ9.1.4a whether took direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her propeQ9.1.4a whether took direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her propeTook direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her property56281Yes2NoActed alone or with help of family member (q9.1.5)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.5)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.5)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.5)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.5)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?5628915Took direct physical action against perpetrator by using vioQ9.1.5a whether took direct physical action against perpetrator by using violencQ9.1.5a whether took direct physical action against perpetrator by using violencQ9.1.5a whether took direct physical action against perpetrator by using violencQ9.1.5a whether took direct physical action against perpetrator by using violencQ9.1.5a whether took direct physical action against perpetrator by using violencTook direct physical action against perpetrator by using violence56281Yes2NoActed alone or with help of family member (q9.1.6)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.6)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.6)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.6)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.6)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?5628916Took direct action against perpetrator by using non-violentQ9.1.6a whether took direct action against perpetrator by using non-violent methQ9.1.6a whether took direct action against perpetrator by using non-violent methQ9.1.6a whether took direct action against perpetrator by using non-violent methQ9.1.6a whether took direct action against perpetrator by using non-violent methQ9.1.6a whether took direct action against perpetrator by using non-violent methTook direct action against perpetrator by using non-violent methods like social boycotting56281Yes2NoLocal leader (q9.2.1)Local leader (q9.2.1)Local leader (q9.2.1)Local leader (q9.2.1)Local leader (q9.2.1)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271921Went to a local political leader (up chairman/member other)SysmissQ9.2.1a whether went to a local political leader (up chairman/member otherQ9.2.1a whether went to a local political leader (up chairman/member otherQ9.2.1a whether went to a local political leader (up chairman/member otherQ9.2.1a whether went to a local political leader (up chairman/member otherQ9.2.1a whether went to a local political leader (up chairman/member otherWent to a local political leader (UP chairman/member, other) [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoQ9.2.1b whyQ9.2.1b whyQ9.2.1b whyQ9.2.1b whyQ9.2.1b whyWhy did you go?228033481For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissLocal leader (q9.2.2)Local leader (q9.2.2)Local leader (q9.2.2)Local leader (q9.2.2)Local leader (q9.2.2)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271922Went to a religious leaderSysmissQ9.2.2a whether went to a religious leaderQ9.2.2a whether went to a religious leaderQ9.2.2a whether went to a religious leaderQ9.2.2a whether went to a religious leaderQ9.2.2a whether went to a religious leaderWent to a religious leader [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoQ9.2.2b whyQ9.2.2b whyQ9.2.2b whyQ9.2.2b whyQ9.2.2b whyWhy did you go?12954991For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissLocal leader (q9.2.3)Local leader (q9.2.3)Local leader (q9.2.3)Local leader (q9.2.3)Local leader (q9.2.3)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271923Went to local unelected community leaderSysmissQ9.2.3a whether went to local unelected community leaderQ9.2.3a whether went to local unelected community leaderQ9.2.3a whether went to local unelected community leaderQ9.2.3a whether went to local unelected community leaderQ9.2.3a whether went to local unelected community leaderWent to local unelected community leader [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoQ9.2.3b whyQ9.2.3b whyQ9.2.3b whyQ9.2.3b whyQ9.2.3b whyWhy did you go?43251961For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissLocal leader (q9.2.4)Local leader (q9.2.4)Local leader (q9.2.4)Local leader (q9.2.4)Local leader (q9.2.4)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271924Went to employer or landlordSysmissQ9.2.4a whether went to employer or landlordQ9.2.4a whether went to employer or landlordQ9.2.4a whether went to employer or landlordQ9.2.4a whether went to employer or landlordQ9.2.4a whether went to employer or landlordWent to employer or landlord [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoQ9.2.4b whyQ9.2.4b whyQ9.2.4b whyQ9.2.4b whyQ9.2.4b whyWhy did you go?10155271For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissLocal leader (q9.2.5)Local leader (q9.2.5)Local leader (q9.2.5)Local leader (q9.2.5)Local leader (q9.2.5)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?5628925Requested a village shalishQ9.2.5a whether requested a village shalishQ9.2.5a whether requested a village shalishQ9.2.5a whether requested a village shalishQ9.2.5a whether requested a village shalishQ9.2.5a whether requested a village shalishRequested a village shalish[go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoQ9.2.5b whyQ9.2.5b whyQ9.2.5b whyQ9.2.5b whyQ9.2.5b whyWhy did you go?97646521For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissLocal leader (q9.2.6)Local leader (q9.2.6)Local leader (q9.2.6)Local leader (q9.2.6)Local leader (q9.2.6)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271926Went to the local mpSysmissQ9.2.6a whether went to the local mpQ9.2.6a whether went to the local mpQ9.2.6a whether went to the local mpQ9.2.6a whether went to the local mpQ9.2.6a whether went to the local mpWent to the local MP [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoQ9.2.6b whyQ9.2.6b whyQ9.2.6b whyQ9.2.6b whyQ9.2.6b whyWhy did you go?8755411For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissLaw enforcement agencies (9.3.1)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.1)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.1)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.1)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.1)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271931Threatened the other side with legal actionSysmissQ9.3.1a whether threatened the other side with legal actionQ9.3.1a whether threatened the other side with legal actionQ9.3.1a whether threatened the other side with legal actionQ9.3.1a whether threatened the other side with legal actionQ9.3.1a whether threatened the other side with legal actionThreatened the other side with legal action [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoLaw enforcement agencies (9.3.2)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.2)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.2)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.2)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.2)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271932Went to the policeSysmissQ9.3.2a whether went to the policeQ9.3.2a whether went to the policeQ9.3.2a whether went to the policeQ9.3.2a whether went to the policeQ9.3.2a whether went to the policeWent to the police (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)56281Yes2NoQ9.3.2b whyQ9.3.2b whyQ9.3.2b whyQ9.3.2b whyQ9.3.2b whyWhy did you go?98846401For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissLaw enforcement agencies (q9.3.3)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.3)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.3)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.3)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.3)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271933Went to rabSysmissQ9.3.3a whether went to rabQ9.3.3a whether went to rabQ9.3.3a whether went to rabQ9.3.3a whether went to rabQ9.3.3a whether went to rabWent to RAB (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)56281Yes2NoQ9.3.3b whyQ9.3.3b whyQ9.3.3b whyQ9.3.3b whyQ9.3.3b whyWhy did you go?4255861For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in future9SysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissLaw enforcement agencies (q9.3.4)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.4)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.4)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.4)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.4)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271934Went to army/joint force campSysmissQ9.3.4a whether went to army/joint force campQ9.3.4a whether went to army/joint force campQ9.3.4a whether went to army/joint force campQ9.3.4a whether went to army/joint force campQ9.3.4a whether went to army/joint force campWent to army/joint force camp (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)56281Yes2NoQ9.3.4b whyQ9.3.4b whyQ9.3.4b whyQ9.3.4b whyQ9.3.4b whyWhy did you go?4955791For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissLaw enforcement agencies (q9.3.5)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.5)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.5)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.5)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.5)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271935Sought legal advice from a private lawyerSysmissQ9.3.5a whether sought legal advice from a private lawyerQ9.3.5a whether sought legal advice from a private lawyerQ9.3.5a whether sought legal advice from a private lawyerQ9.3.5a whether sought legal advice from a private lawyerQ9.3.5a whether sought legal advice from a private lawyerSought legal advice from a private lawyer [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoLaw enforcement agencies (q9.3.6)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.6)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.6)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.6)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.6)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271936Went to a village courtSysmissQ9.3.6a whether went to a village courtQ9.3.6a whether went to a village courtQ9.3.6a whether went to a village courtQ9.3.6a whether went to a village courtQ9.3.6a whether went to a village courtWent to a Village Court (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)56281Yes2NoQ9.3.6b whyQ9.3.6b whyQ9.3.6b whyQ9.3.6b whyQ9.3.6b whyWhy did you go?23153971For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissLaw enforcement agenciesLaw enforcement agenciesLaw enforcement agenciesLaw enforcement agenciesLaw enforcement agenciesWhat did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271937Sought advice of government legal aidSysmissQ9.3.7a whether sought legal advice from government legal aidQ9.3.7a whether sought legal advice from government legal aidQ9.3.7a whether sought legal advice from government legal aidQ9.3.7a whether sought legal advice from government legal aidQ9.3.7a whether sought legal advice from government legal aidSought advice of government legal aid (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)56281Yes2NoQ9.3.7b whyQ9.3.7b whyQ9.3.7b whyQ9.3.7b whyQ9.3.7b whyWhy did you go?18454441For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in future9SysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissLaw enforcement agencies (q9.3.8)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.8)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.8)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.8)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.8)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?5628938Went to courtQ9.3.8a whether went to courtQ9.3.8a whether went to courtQ9.3.8a whether went to courtQ9.3.8a whether went to courtQ9.3.8a whether went to courtWent to court (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)56281Yes2NoQ9.3.8b whyQ9.3.8b whyQ9.3.8b whyQ9.3.8b whyQ9.3.8b whyWhy did you go?89547331For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissNgo (q9.4.1)Ngo (q9.4.1)Ngo (q9.4.1)Ngo (q9.4.1)Ngo (q9.4.1)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56262941Went to an ngo legal aid service for assistanceSysmissQ9.4.1a whether went to an ngo legal aid service for assistanceQ9.4.1a whether went to an ngo legal aid service for assistanceQ9.4.1a whether went to an ngo legal aid service for assistanceQ9.4.1a whether went to an ngo legal aid service for assistanceQ9.4.1a whether went to an ngo legal aid service for assistanceWent to an NGO legal aid service for assistance(If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)562711Yes2NoSysmissQ9.4.1b whyQ9.4.1b whyQ9.4.1b whyQ9.4.1b whyQ9.4.1b whyWhy did you go?4155871For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissGovt official (q9.5.1)Govt official (q9.5.1)Govt official (q9.5.1)Govt official (q9.5.1)Govt official (q9.5.1)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?56271951Went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrativeSysmissQ9.5.1a whether went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrative offiQ9.5.1a whether went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrative offiQ9.5.1a whether went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrative offiQ9.5.1a whether went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrative offiQ9.5.1a whether went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrative offiWent to the Upazila Nirhabi Officer or other administrative official (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)562711Yes2NoSysmissQ9.5.1b whyQ9.5.1b whyQ9.5.1b whyQ9.5.1b whyQ9.5.1b whyWhy did you go?15254761For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissNothing (q9.6)Nothing (q9.6)Nothing (q9.6)Nothing (q9.6)Nothing (q9.6)What did you do in response to the [most serious] incident?5627196Did nothingSysmissDid nothingDid nothingDid nothingDid nothingDid nothingDid nothing56281Yes2NoOthers (q9.7)Others (q9.7)Others (q9.7)Others (q9.7)Others (q9.7)5627197OtherSysmissQ9.7a whether went to other persons or institutionQ9.7a whether went to other persons or institutionQ9.7a whether went to other persons or institutionQ9.7a whether went to other persons or institutionQ9.7a whether went to other persons or institutionOther (specify)562711Yes2NoSysmissQ9.7b whyQ9.7b whyQ9.7b whyQ9.7b whyQ9.7b whyWhy did you go?14454841For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionQ9.7c reason for going/not going to other person/institutionThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior56281Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherName of ngoName of ngoName of ngoName of ngoName of ngoIn section C, if answered yes to 9.4.1, which NGO did you go to?562711Brac2Proshika3Asha4Grameen somaj kalyan somity5Grameen bank8Never goes to ngoSysmissMain reason for choosing this ngoMain reason for choosing this ngoMain reason for choosing this ngoMain reason for choosing this ngoMain reason for choosing this ngoWhy did you choose this NGO over others?[Record up to 3 reasons]3455941Acquaintaces in the ngo2Fair end and impartial trial3Speedy trial4Less experience/ free of change5Ngo office in the area6Provides legal aid7Accesseble8Provision for dispursing loans9Permanent role in settling disputes10Pays compensation for damages11Works toward peoples welfare like installation of filters in12Blank13Blank14Blank15OthersSysmissSecond reason for choosing this ngoSecond reason for choosing this ngoSecond reason for choosing this ngoSecond reason for choosing this ngoSecond reason for choosing this ngoWhy did you choose this NGO over others?[Record up to 3 reasons]1956091Acquaintaces in the ngo2Fair end and impartial trial3Speedy trial4Less experience/ free of change5Ngo office in the area6Provides legal aid7Accesseble8Provision for dispursing loans9Permanent role in settling disputes10Pays compensation for damages11Works toward peoples welfare like installation of filters in12Blank13Blank14Blank15OthersSysmissThird reason for choosing this ngoThird reason for choosing this ngoThird reason for choosing this ngoThird reason for choosing this ngoThird reason for choosing this ngoWhy did you choose this NGO over others?[Record up to 3 reasons]556231Acquaintaces in the ngo2Fair end and impartial trial3Speedy trial4Less experience/ free of change5Ngo office in the area6Provides legal aid7Accesseble8Provision for dispursing loans9Permanent role in settling disputes10Pays compensation for damages11Works toward peoples welfare like installation of filters in12Blank13Blank14Blank15OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionTo the interviewer: See Q9a. (if the respondent did not go to any institution, then ask Q12.2 and go to Section D. otherwise go to Q13)If you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]56281It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersWhich institution played most important role(q13.1)Which institution played most important role(q13.1)Which institution played most important role(q13.1)Which institution played most important role(q13.1)Which institution played most important role(q13.1)[To interviewer: if the respondent went to multiple institutions, if answered yes to 9.3, 9.4 and 9.5, then record the answers for the most important institution as identified by the respondent for his/her dispute resolution]If you did decide to seek resolution through one of these institutions, we would like to know about your experience in detail.If the respondent went to more than one institution, which played the most important role in dispute resolution?[See section C, 9.3, 9.4 and 9.5 and write the line number from Q9]
(Write from section C Q9)1601402796Did nothing931Threatened the other side with legal action932Went to the police933Went to rab934Went to army/joint force camp935Sought legal advice from a private lawyer936Went to a village court937Sought advice of government legal aid938Went to court941Went to an ngo legal aid service for assistance951Went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrativeSysmissExpectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)What did/do you hope to achieve from this institution?[record all that apply]562621A fair application of the law to my dispute/grievance2Revenge3Right to property/asset4Apology from the disputant'5Monetary compensation9OtherSysmissExpectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)What did/do you hope to achieve from this institution?[record all that apply]56281A fair application of the law to my dispute/grievance2Revenge3Right to property/asset4Apology from the disputant'5Monetary compensation9OtherExpectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)What did/do you hope to achieve from this institution?[record all that apply]56281A fair application of the law to my dispute/grievance2Revenge3Right to property/asset4Apology from the disputant'5Monetary compensation9OtherExpectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)What did/do you hope to achieve from this institution?[record all that apply]56281A fair application of the law to my dispute/grievance2Revenge3Right to property/asset4Apology from the disputant'5Monetary compensation9OtherExpectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)What did/do you hope to achieve from this institution?[record all that apply]56281A fair application of the law to my dispute/grievance2Revenge3Right to property/asset4Apology from the disputant'5Monetary compensation9OtherExpectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)What did/do you hope to achieve from this institution?[record all that apply]56281A fair application of the law to my dispute/grievance2Revenge3Right to property/asset4Apology from the disputant'5Monetary compensation9Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions [record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99OtherWhether understand the procedure that the institutions followedWhether understand the procedure that the institutions followedWhether understand the procedure that the institutions followedWhether understand the procedure that the institutions followedWhether understand the procedure that the institutions followedDid you understand the procedure that the institutions followed?160140271Yes2NoSysmissWere the procedures easy/difficult to understandWere the procedures easy/difficult to understandWere the procedures easy/difficult to understandWere the procedures easy/difficult to understandWere the procedures easy/difficult to understandWere the procedures easy/difficult to understand?160140271Easy2DifficultSysmissAny one explained about the procedureAny one explained about the procedureAny one explained about the procedureAny one explained about the procedureAny one explained about the procedureDid someone explain them to you/answer your questions about the procedure?160140271Yes2No9SysmissBoth the parties get a chance to tell their sideBoth the parties get a chance to tell their sideBoth the parties get a chance to tell their sideBoth the parties get a chance to tell their sideBoth the parties get a chance to tell their sideDid both the parties get a chance to tell their side?160140271Both parties got a chance2Only i got a chance3Only the other party got a chance8Not applicable9SysmissThe procedure that the institution followed fairThe procedure that the institution followed fairThe procedure that the institution followed fairThe procedure that the institution followed fairThe procedure that the institution followed fairDid you think that the procedure that the institution followed fair?160140271Yes2No7Dont knowSysmissThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsDo you think that the police/shalishkars/lawyers/judges consider/understand
a) the relevant laws and160140271Yes2No7Dont knowSysmissThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsDo you think that the police/shalishkars/lawyers/judges consider/understand
b) community norms [related to your case]?160140271Yes2No7Dont knowSysmissThe outcome was fair as per respondent's opinionThe outcome was fair as per respondent's opinionThe outcome was fair as per respondent's opinionThe outcome was fair as per respondent's opinionThe outcome was fair as per respondent's opinionDo you think the outcome was fair?160140271Yes2No3Not resolved yetSysmissThe outcome was fair as per communities' opinionThe outcome was fair as per communities' opinionThe outcome was fair as per communities' opinionThe outcome was fair as per communities' opinionThe outcome was fair as per communities' opinionDid the community think that the outcome was fair?160140271Yes2No3Not resolved yet7Dont knowSysmissWilling to go to the same institution for any future problemWilling to go to the same institution for any future problemWilling to go to the same institution for any future problemWilling to go to the same institution for any future problemWilling to go to the same institution for any future problemWould you go to the same institution for any future problem?160140271Yes2No7Dont know9SysmissDispute was settledDispute was settledDispute was settledDispute was settledDispute was settled[For those who sought resolution through an institution] we would like to know more details about the dispute?Has the dispute been settled?438012481Yes2No9SysmissTime taken between reporting the incident and the settlementTime taken between reporting the incident and the settlementTime taken between reporting the incident and the settlementTime taken between reporting the incident and the settlementTime taken between reporting the incident and the settlementIf answered yes in Q14.1, time taken between reporting the incident and the settlement (in months)11214507198 'the case is still going on'234567891011121314151618192021222425282930343642444548516070727884959899SysmissAmont of money spent to resolve this dispute for court fees and other legal expeAmont of money spent to resolve this dispute for court fees and other legal expeAmont of money spent to resolve this dispute for court fees and other legal expeAmont of money spent to resolve this dispute for court fees and other legal expeAmont of money spent to resolve this dispute for court fees and other legal expea) How much money (approx) did you spend to resolve this dispute for court fees and other legal expenses?437912495102029303650981001251501772002503003203503603653704004505005256007007208008509001000110012001400150016001800190020002100250026002800300032003500400042004500500055006000700072007500800090001000011000120001225013000135001400015000160001800020000220002400025000270002800030000320003300034000350003730040000420004400044700450004800050000518005400055000560006000065000700007500080000840008500090000100000110000115000120000130000150000160000200000250000300000400000500000999998No expenses9999999899999999SysmissAmount spent to resolve this dispute as bribe or speed moneyAmount spent to resolve this dispute as bribe or speed moneyAmount spent to resolve this dispute as bribe or speed moneyAmount spent to resolve this dispute as bribe or speed moneyAmount spent to resolve this dispute as bribe or speed moneyb) How much money (approx) did you spend to resolve this dispute as bribe or speed money?43791249151950100150200250300400500600700800900100011601200130014001500160020002200250026002650300032003500360037004000450050005500600065007000800090001000011000120001300014000150001600017000180001900020000210002500027000290003000033000350003600040000450004700050000600006500070000800008500090000100000110000120000125000130000140000150000170000200000220000225000240000250000300000350000400000500000600000999998No expenses9999999899999999SysmissAmount spent to resolve this dispute as other expensesAmount spent to resolve this dispute as other expensesAmount spent to resolve this dispute as other expensesAmount spent to resolve this dispute as other expensesAmount spent to resolve this dispute as other expensesc) How much money (approx) did you spend to resolve this dispute as other expenses (e.g conveyance, food etc)43791249203040507580100110150190200240300400450500520600650700800900970100010221050120014001500170018002000210022002400250028003000342935003600380040004500500055006000700072008000830090009300100001020012000130001400015000160001700018000200002200023000240002500027000290003000035000360003800040000440004500047000480004900050000600006500070000750008000090000100000110000120000130000150000200000999998No expenses9999999899999999SysmissAmount recovered through the dispute settlementAmount recovered through the dispute settlementAmount recovered through the dispute settlementAmount recovered through the dispute settlementAmount recovered through the dispute settlement(d) How much money did you recover through the dispute settlement, if any?4379124939610020029030040050058059570080010001200150020003000350040004500500058006000700080001000011000140001500015500160001700020000220002500030000360004000044000450005000060000620006600070000800008500090000100000150000158000175000185000200000240000300000400000500000900000999998No money was recovered9999999899999999SysmissWhether complied with the decisionWhether complied with the decisionWhether complied with the decisionWhether complied with the decisionWhether complied with the decisionDid you comply with the decision (if answered yes to Q14.1)?438012481Yes2No3Not resolved yet9SysmissMain reason for complianceMain reason for complianceMain reason for complianceMain reason for complianceMain reason for complianceWhat are the reasons for compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]107745511No other alternative2Vetict was right/impartial3Got the metre/line for paying bill/money4Accepted the verdict for peace in the area/will be in troubl5Accepted the verdict due to political/influential/local elit6Freed from jail through speed money/bribe7Verdict was in my favour8Forgave opponents as they were helpless9Case dimissed following name being removed from charge sheet10End of misunderstanding between the two parties11Accepted the dessision of devorce for own safety12Accepted the verdict as the incident was among ourselves13Settled the dispute through dowry/alimony14Opponents withdrew the case15Accepted the verdict in exchange of money/land90Others97Dk98NaSysmissSecond reason for complianceSecond reason for complianceSecond reason for complianceSecond reason for complianceSecond reason for complianceWhat are the reasons for compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]2856001No other alternative2Vetict was right/impartial3Got the metre/line for paying bill/money4Accepted the verdict for peace in the area/will be in troubl5Accepted the verdict due to political/influential/local elit6Freed from jail through speed money/bribe7Verdict was in my favour8Forgave opponents as they were helpless9Case dimissed following name being removed from charge sheet10End of misunderstanding between the two parties11Accepted the dessision of devorce for own safety12Accepted the verdict as the incident was among ourselves13Settled the dispute through dowry/alimony14Opponents withdrew the case15Accepted the verdict in exchange of money/land90Others97Dk98NaSysmissThird reason for complianceThird reason for complianceThird reason for complianceThird reason for complianceThird reason for complianceWhat are the reasons for compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]156271No other alternative2Vetict was right/impartial3Got the metre/line for paying bill/money4Accepted the verdict for peace in the area/will be in troubl5Accepted the verdict due to political/influential/local elit6Freed from jail through speed money/bribe7Verdict was in my favour8Forgave opponents as they were helpless9Case dimissed following name being removed from charge sheet10End of misunderstanding between the two parties11Accepted the dessision of devorce for own safety12Accepted the verdict as the incident was among ourselves13Settled the dispute through dowry/alimony14Opponents withdrew the case15Accepted the verdict in exchange of money/land90Others97Dk98NaSysmissMain reason for non-complianceMain reason for non-complianceMain reason for non-complianceMain reason for non-complianceMain reason for non-complianceWhat are the reasons for non-compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]1656121Felt that it was corruption with the adjudication being wron2Forced to accept through pressure of the chairman/administra3Land not sold as the valid deed/documents are with me as wel4Trial was unfair5Judgement not accepted as verdict was not in my favour6Saw another doctor for not being to pay the fee90Others97Dk98NaSysmissSecond reason for non-complianceSecond reason for non-complianceSecond reason for non-complianceSecond reason for non-complianceSecond reason for non-complianceWhat are the reasons for non-compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]256261Felt that it was corruption with the adjudication being wron2Forced to accept through pressure of the chairman/administra3Land not sold as the valid deed/documents are with me as wel4Trial was unfair5Judgement not accepted as verdict was not in my favour6Saw another doctor for not being to pay the fee90Others97Dk98NaSysmissThird reason for non-complianceThird reason for non-complianceThird reason for non-complianceThird reason for non-complianceThird reason for non-complianceWhat are the reasons for non-compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]156271Felt that it was corruption with the adjudication being wron2Forced to accept through pressure of the chairman/administra3Land not sold as the valid deed/documents are with me as wel4Trial was unfair5Judgement not accepted as verdict was not in my favour6Saw another doctor for not being to pay the fee90Others97Dk98NaSysmissWhether the other party comply with the decisionWhether the other party comply with the decisionWhether the other party comply with the decisionWhether the other party comply with the decisionWhether the other party comply with the decisionDid the other party comply with the decision?111945091Yes2No79SysmissMain reasons for the other party's complianceMain reasons for the other party's complianceMain reasons for the other party's complianceMain reasons for the other party's complianceMain reasons for the other party's complianceWhat are the reasons for the other party's compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]105545731Doctor provided proper care for being paid the fee2Accepted the verdict in exchange of bribes3Verdict was in my favour4Opponerts accepted the verdict after understanding their mis5Settled in thana/police station6Work stopped due to non-payment of bribe7Thief has been canght8Accepted the verdict for judgement being fair9Did not have to pay money as he was forgiven10Accepted the judgement as our demand was right11They accepted the verdict for beign paid12End of misunderstanding between the two parties13Was willing to cut relations14Accepted the verdict as the incident was among ourselves15Accepted the verdict due to the presurre of elites16Settled through payment of money17Did not provide care for probility to pay the fee90Others97Dk98NaSysmissSecond reasons for the other party's complianceSecond reasons for the other party's complianceSecond reasons for the other party's complianceSecond reasons for the other party's complianceSecond reasons for the other party's complianceWhat are the reasons for the other party's compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]1156171Doctor provided proper care for being paid the fee2Accepted the verdict in exchange of bribes3Verdict was in my favour4Opponerts accepted the verdict after understanding their mis5Settled in thana/police station6Work stopped due to non-payment of bribe7Thief has been canght8Accepted the verdict for judgement being fair9Did not have to pay money as he was forgiven10Accepted the judgement as our demand was right11They accepted the verdict for beign paid12End of misunderstanding between the two parties13Was willing to cut relations14Accepted the verdict as the incident was among ourselves15Accepted the verdict due to the presurre of elites16Settled through payment of money17Did not provide care for probility to pay the fee90Others97Dk98NaSysmissThird reasons for the other party's complianceThird reasons for the other party's complianceThird reasons for the other party's complianceThird reasons for the other party's complianceThird reasons for the other party's complianceWhat are the reasons for the other party's compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]56281Doctor provided proper care for being paid the fee2Accepted the verdict in exchange of bribes3Verdict was in my favour4Opponerts accepted the verdict after understanding their mis5Settled in thana/police station6Work stopped due to non-payment of bribe7Thief has been canght8Accepted the verdict for judgement being fair9Did not have to pay money as he was forgiven10Accepted the judgement as our demand was right11They accepted the verdict for beign paid12End of misunderstanding between the two parties13Was willing to cut relations14Accepted the verdict as the incident was among ourselves15Accepted the verdict due to the presurre of elites16Settled through payment of money17Did not provide care for probility to pay the fee90Others97Dk98NaSysmissMain reason for the other party's non-complianceMain reason for the other party's non-complianceMain reason for the other party's non-complianceMain reason for the other party's non-complianceMain reason for the other party's non-complianceWhat are the reasons for the other party's non-compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]1256161Judgement was not fair/impartial2For verdict not beign in my favour3Targeted for harassment4Didnt accept the verdict as they were influential90Others97Dk98NaSysmissSecond reason for the other party's non-complianceSecond reason for the other party's non-complianceSecond reason for the other party's non-complianceSecond reason for the other party's non-complianceSecond reason for the other party's non-complianceWhat are the reasons for the other party's non-compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]256261Judgement was not fair/impartial2For verdict not beign in my favour3Targeted for harassment4Didnt accept the verdict as they were influential90Others97Dk98NaSysmissThird reason for the other party's non-complianceThird reason for the other party's non-complianceThird reason for the other party's non-complianceThird reason for the other party's non-complianceThird reason for the other party's non-complianceWhat are the reasons for the other party's non-compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]56281Judgement was not fair/impartial2For verdict not beign in my favour3Targeted for harassment4Didnt accept the verdict as they were influential90Others97Dk98NaSysmissRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weight56280.02585.126Household idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold id97531001357095ClusterClusterClusterClusterCluster97531357HhnoHhnoHhnoHhnoHhno97531601Type of areaType of areaType of areaType of areaType of area97531Rural2UrbanQ10Q10Q10Q10Q10In section C, if answered yes to 9.4.1, which NGO did you go to?569940541Name of the ngo8Did not go to an ngo9SysmissHave any family members ever been detained by the police/rab?Have any family members ever been detained by the police/rab?Have any family members ever been detained by the police/rab?Have any family members ever been detained by the police/rab?Have any family members ever been detained by the police/rab?Have any family members ever been detained by the police/RAB?97531Yes2NoHow long agoHow long agoHow long agoHow long agoHow long agoHow long ago?975399Have any family members ever been charged of an offence and imprisoned awaitingHave any family members ever been charged of an offence and imprisoned awaitingHave any family members ever been charged of an offence and imprisoned awaitingHave any family members ever been charged of an offence and imprisoned awaitingHave any family members ever been charged of an offence and imprisoned awaitingHave any family members ever been charged of an offence, and imprisoned awaiting a trial (without being convicted)97531Yes2NoHow long agoHow long agoHow long agoHow long agoHow long agoHow long ago?975399Have any family members ever been appeared before the courts after being summoneHave any family members ever been appeared before the courts after being summoneHave any family members ever been appeared before the courts after being summoneHave any family members ever been appeared before the courts after being summoneHave any family members ever been appeared before the courts after being summoneHave any family members ever appeared before the courts after being summoned97531Yes2NoHow long agoHow long agoHow long agoHow long agoHow long agoHow long ago?975399Have any family members ever been convictedHave any family members ever been convictedHave any family members ever been convictedHave any family members ever been convictedHave any family members ever been convictedHave any family members ever been convicted97531Yes2NoHow long agoHow long agoHow long agoHow long agoHow long agoHow long ago?975399How were they treated by the policeHow were they treated by the policeHow were they treated by the policeHow were they treated by the policeHow were they treated by the policeTo the interviewer: See Q15b and if the incident took place within last 7 years, then ask Q16 and Q17 (In cases of multiple incidents record the most recent incident; If no incident took place, then go to Section E)If answered yes to any of Q15, then how were they treated by the police?80689471Very well2Fairly well3Badly4Very badly5Inhumanely6Brutally9OtherSysmissHow were they treated by the prison guardsHow were they treated by the prison guardsHow were they treated by the prison guardsHow were they treated by the prison guardsHow were they treated by the prison guardsIf answered yes to any of Q15, then how were they treated by the prison guards?80689471Very well2Fairly well3Badly4Very badly5Inhumanely6Brutally9OtherSysmissHow were they treated by the courtsHow were they treated by the courtsHow were they treated by the courtsHow were they treated by the courtsHow were they treated by the courtsIf answered yes to any of Q15, then how were they treated by the courts?80689471Very well2Fairly well3Badly4Very badly5Inhumanely6Brutally9OtherSysmissDid this encounter with police/prison/courts change your view about these instiDid this encounter with police/prison/courts change your view about these instiDid this encounter with police/prison/courts change your view about these instiDid this encounter with police/prison/courts change your view about these instiDid this encounter with police/prison/courts change your view about these instiDid this encounter with police/prison/courts change your view about these institutions?80689471Yes2NoSysmissHow this encounter change your view about the institutionHow this encounter change your view about the institutionHow this encounter change your view about the institutionHow this encounter change your view about the institutionHow this encounter change your view about the institutionIf yes, then how?48492691View them with more respect2Remained the same3View them with less respect4Dont respect them at allSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]56491891Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]817315801Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]27494791Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]88858681Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]118085731Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]158281711Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]183579181Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]21895351Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]50592481Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]18195721Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]6096931Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]7896751Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]89188621Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
a) abuse[record all that apply]14996041Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents, guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]49992541Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]715326001Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]28294711Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]839913541Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]391658371Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]117685771Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]147282811Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]22695271Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]88988641Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]6896851Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]2097331Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]5297011Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]73090231Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
b) civil disputes?[record all that apply]12696271Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]74490091Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]808216711Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]33094231Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]871110421Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]80589481Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]175779961Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]238773661Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]32494291Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]31594381Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]27194821Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]5197021Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]6496891Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]99587581Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the followingWho do you think should be responsible for preventing and solving the following in your area?
c) crimes?[record all that apply]10196521Community groups2Community leaders3Religious leaders4Up/ward chairman/members5Courts6Parents/guardians and families7Police8Community police9Upazila or district officials10Rab11Army/bdr12Mps13Local political leader99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]170580481Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]398657671Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]16395901Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]20695471Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]144983041Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]740323501Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]14796061Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]11296411Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]407056831Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]22095331Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]41693371Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]26594881Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissWhere do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses/disputes or crimes?Where do you get information about how to resolve abuses, disputes or crimes?[code all that apply]41093431Newspaper2Radio or television3Posters, leaflets4School or college5Co-workers6Family/friends and neighbors7Community meeting8Ngos9Up chairmen/member10Upazila officials11Police station12Mosque/church/religious organization99OtherSysmissRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sex97531Male2FemaleRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weight97530.02585.126348662671234567Sysmiss9753129753310097531239753197531Household idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold id975301001357095Cluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster number975301357Household numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold number975301601Type of areaType of areaType of areaType of areaType of area975301Rural2UrbanCode of justice institutionCode of justice institutionCode of justice institutionCode of justice institutionCode of justice institutionHow much confidence do you have in the following institutions? How would you rate them in terms of their honesty or corruption? Do they treat everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men equally? Is it equally easy for everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men - to access these institutions and services? Which of these institutions would be the fairest and most accessible for poor people, women, and minority groups?Justice Institution975301Tdr2Village court/ up arbitration council3Ngo sponsored shalish4High court/supreme court5Courts (other than supreme/high court)6Land settlement office7Police8Rab9Joint forces camp10Anti-corruption commissionConfidenceConfidenceConfidenceConfidenceConfidenceHow much confidence do you have in the following institutions? How would you rate them in terms of their honesty or corruption? Do they treat everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men equally? Is it equally easy for everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men - to access these institutions and services? Which of these institutions would be the fairest and most accessible for poor people, women, and minority groups?Confidence975301Very confident2Confident3Fairly confident4Not at all confident8DkHonesty and corruptionHonesty and corruptionHonesty and corruptionHonesty and corruptionHonesty and corruptionHow much confidence do you have in the following institutions? How would you rate them in terms of their honesty or corruption? Do they treat everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men equally? Is it equally easy for everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men - to access these institutions and services? Which of these institutions would be the fairest and most accessible for poor people, women, and minority groups?Honesty and corruption975301Very honest2=honest3Somewhat honest4Somewhat corrupt5Very corrupt68DkEqual treatmentEqual treatmentEqual treatmentEqual treatmentEqual treatmentHow much confidence do you have in the following institutions? How would you rate them in terms of their honesty or corruption? Do they treat everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men equally? Is it equally easy for everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men - to access these institutions and services? Which of these institutions would be the fairest and most accessible for poor people, women, and minority groups?Equal treatment975301Yes2No8DkEqual accessEqual accessEqual accessEqual accessEqual accessHow much confidence do you have in the following institutions? How would you rate them in terms of their honesty or corruption? Do they treat everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men equally? Is it equally easy for everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men - to access these institutions and services? Which of these institutions would be the fairest and most accessible for poor people, women, and minority groups?Equal access975301Yes2No8DkIf beneficial to these groups (poor)If beneficial to these groups (poor)If beneficial to these groups (poor)If beneficial to these groups (poor)If beneficial to these groups (poor)How much confidence do you have in the following institutions? How would you rate them in terms of their honesty or corruption? Do they treat everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men equally? Is it equally easy for everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men - to access these institutions and services? Which of these institutions would be the fairest and most accessible for poor people, women, and minority groups?If beneficial to these groups: Poor975301Beneficial2Somehow beneficial3Not beneficial8DkIf beneficial to these groups (women)If beneficial to these groups (women)If beneficial to these groups (women)If beneficial to these groups (women)If beneficial to these groups (women)How much confidence do you have in the following institutions? How would you rate them in terms of their honesty or corruption? Do they treat everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men equally? Is it equally easy for everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men - to access these institutions and services? Which of these institutions would be the fairest and most accessible for poor people, women, and minority groups?If beneficial to these groups: Women975301Beneficial2Somehow beneficial3Not beneficial8DkIf beneficial to these groups (minority groups)If beneficial to these groups (minority groups)If beneficial to these groups (minority groups)If beneficial to these groups (minority groups)If beneficial to these groups (minority groups)How much confidence do you have in the following institutions? How would you rate them in terms of their honesty or corruption? Do they treat everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men equally? Is it equally easy for everyone - rich and poor, Muslim and non-Muslim, Bengali or non-Bengali, women and men - to access these institutions and services? Which of these institutions would be the fairest and most accessible for poor people, women, and minority groups?If beneficial to these groups: Minority Groups975301Beneficial2Somehow beneficial3Not beneficial8DkRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sex975301Male2FemaleRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weight975300.02585.12634860626701234567Sysmiss97530197530310097530123Hh id numberHh id numberHh id numberHh id numberHh id number97530357095Cluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster number975301357Household numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold number975301601Code of justice institutionCode of justice institutionCode of justice institutionCode of justice institutionCode of justice institutionPlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Institutions975301Tdr2Village court/ up arbitration council3Ngo sponsored shalish4High court/supreme court5Courts (other than supreme/high court)6Land settlement office7Police8Rab9Joint forces camp10Anti-corruption commissionChange occured in performance of the institution take place within last two yearChange occured in performance of the institution take place within last two yearChange occured in performance of the institution take place within last two yearChange occured in performance of the institution take place within last two yearChange occured in performance of the institution take place within last two yearPlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system](____) did any change in performance of the institution take place within last two years (2007-2008) compared to 1991-2006 (during political regimes of Khaleda/hasina)975301Excellent2Very good3Good4Fair5Poor6No change took place7Dont knowPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersAny change occured performance of the institution take place during 1991-2006 cAny change occured performance of the institution take place during 1991-2006 cAny change occured performance of the institution take place during 1991-2006 cAny change occured performance of the institution take place during 1991-2006 cAny change occured performance of the institution take place during 1991-2006 cPlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system](____) did any change in performance of the institution take place during 1991-2006 compared to 1982-1991975301Excellent2Very good3Good4Fair5Poor6No change took place7Dont knowPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersAny change occured in performance of the institution take place during 1982-199Any change occured in performance of the institution take place during 1982-199Any change occured in performance of the institution take place during 1982-199Any change occured in performance of the institution take place during 1982-199Any change occured in performance of the institution take place during 1982-199Please think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system](____) did any change in performance of the institution take place during 1982-1990 compared to years before this time975301Excellent2Very good3Good4Fair5Poor6No change took place7Dont knowPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersPrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePrincipal reason for perceived improvement or declinePlease think about past years. Tell me if you percieve any changes in these organizations since 1982. [Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate box. To receive data about 25 years ago, help the respondent by reminding specific national incidents that happened around that time e.g. death of Ziaur Rahman, beginning of Ershad's regime, introducing upazila system]Principal reason for perceived improvement or decline975301Citizens are more aware about their rights in general2The system has become more responsive to citizens3Because of governments new better policies4Because of democracy5Because of positive ngo activities6Because of free media7Because of positive social/normative change8Dont know the reasons9Citizens are not aware about their rights in general10The system has become less responsive to citizens11Because of no new governments policies12Because of absence of democracy13Because of negative ngo activities14Because of absence of free media15Because of negative social change99OthersRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sex975301Male2FemaleRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weight975300.02585.126Household idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold idHousehold id97531001357095Cluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster number97531357179.799103.118Type of areaType of areaType of areaType of areaType of area97531Rural2UrbanHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold number9753160195.72263.802In the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]217875751Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]149682571Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]49192621Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]115386001Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]707526781Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]475849951Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]202877251Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]6396901Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]6196921Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]2397301Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]59191621Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]5097031Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]5397001Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]36093931Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]3297211Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]30494491Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]478349701Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]3197221Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish who are the shalishkars in your locaIn the case of traditional/informal shalish, who are the shalishkars in your local area at present? [please record the identity following the code below; not their name]35094031Land-based elites2Business elites3Religious leader/imams4Political leaders5Up chairman/city or municipality mayor6Male up members/ward commissioners7Female up members/ward commissioner8Local mp9Regular job holder (govt.)10Regular job holder (non-govt.)11School teacher12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police17Common village dwellers18Ngo99OtherSysmissDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the Caretaker Government period is likely to act as a constraint on the future behaviour of politicians, businessmen and government officials?
a. Businessmen97531Will make the situation better/they will act more responsibl2Will make no difference3Will make the situation worse8DkDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the Caretaker Government period is likely to act as a constraint on the future behaviour of politicians, businessmen and government officials?
b. Government officials97531Will make the situation better/they will act more responsibl2Will make no difference3Will make the situation worse8DkDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the Caretaker Government period is likely to act as a constraint on the future behaviour of politicians, businessmen and government officials?
c. National politicians97531Will make the situation better/they will act more responsibl2Will make no difference3Will make the situation worse8DkDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the Caretaker Government period is likely to act as a constraint on the future behaviour of politicians, businessmen and government officials?
d. Local politicians97531Will make the situation better/they will act more responsibl2Will make no difference3Will make the situation worse8DkDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the caretaker government period is likeDo you think that law enforcement during the Caretaker Government period is likely to act as a constraint on the future behaviour of politicians, businessmen and government officials?
e. Organized criminal networks at the local level97531Will make the situation better/they will act more responsibl2Will make no difference3Will make the situation worse8Dk9Only in response to very serious crimes involving violenceOnly in response to very serious crimes involving violenceOnly in response to very serious crimes involving violenceOnly in response to very serious crimes involving violenceOnly in response to very serious crimes involving violenceWhen would you support taking the law into your own hands to resolve problems/abuse of power /crimes/civil disputes?
Only in response to very serious crimes involving violence[Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate answer]97531I support it2I do not support it8DkTo protect oneTo protect oneTo protect oneTo protect oneTo protect oneWhen would you support taking the law into your own hands to resolve problems/abuse of power /crimes/civil disputes?
To protect one's belongings from theft[Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate answer]97531I support it2I do not support it8DkIf the perpetrator is well-known to be involved in serious criminal activityIf the perpetrator is well-known to be involved in serious criminal activityIf the perpetrator is well-known to be involved in serious criminal activityIf the perpetrator is well-known to be involved in serious criminal activityIf the perpetrator is well-known to be involved in serious criminal activityWhen would you support taking the law into your own hands to resolve problems/abuse of power /crimes/civil disputes?
If the perpetrator is well-known to be involved in serious criminal activity[Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate answer]97531I support it2I do not support it8DkWhen the whole community is affected by a crimeWhen the whole community is affected by a crimeWhen the whole community is affected by a crimeWhen the whole community is affected by a crimeWhen the whole community is affected by a crimeWhen would you support taking the law into your own hands to resolve problems/abuse of power /crimes/civil disputes?
When the whole community is affected by a crime[Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate answer]97531I support it2I do not support it8DkWhen police fail to respond appropriatelyWhen police fail to respond appropriatelyWhen police fail to respond appropriatelyWhen police fail to respond appropriatelyWhen police fail to respond appropriatelyWhen would you support taking the law into your own hands to resolve problems/abuse of power /crimes/civil disputes?
When police fail to respond appropriately[Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate answer]97531I support it2I do not support it8DkIf one doesnot get resolution through formal/informal institutional processesIf one doesnot get resolution through formal/informal institutional processesIf one doesnot get resolution through formal/informal institutional processesIf one doesnot get resolution through formal/informal institutional processesIf one doesnot get resolution through formal/informal institutional processesWhen would you support taking the law into your own hands to resolve problems/abuse of power /crimes/civil disputes?
If one doesn't get resolution through formal/informal institutional processes[Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate answer]97531I support it2I do not support it8DkOthersOthersOthersOthersOthersWhen would you support taking the law into your own hands to resolve problems/abuse of power /crimes/civil disputes?
Others (specify)[Please read every option slowly to the respondents and check the appropriate answer]97531I support it2I do not support it8DkThe law serves the interests of the government not citizensThe law serves the interests of the government not citizensThe law serves the interests of the government not citizensThe law serves the interests of the government not citizensThe law serves the interests of the government not citizensDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
The law serves the interests of the government, not citizens.97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkPeople who assert their rights are selfish rather than simply asserting their enPeople who assert their rights are selfish rather than simply asserting their enPeople who assert their rights are selfish rather than simply asserting their enPeople who assert their rights are selfish rather than simply asserting their enPeople who assert their rights are selfish rather than simply asserting their enDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
People who assert their rights are selfish, rather than simply asserting their entitlements.97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkThe law only protects the interests of the wealthy not the poorThe law only protects the interests of the wealthy not the poorThe law only protects the interests of the wealthy not the poorThe law only protects the interests of the wealthy not the poorThe law only protects the interests of the wealthy not the poorDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
The law only protects the interests of the wealthy, not the poor.97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkCourts are an important way for citizens to enforce their rights even if they acCourts are an important way for citizens to enforce their rights even if they acCourts are an important way for citizens to enforce their rights even if they acCourts are an important way for citizens to enforce their rights even if they acCourts are an important way for citizens to enforce their rights even if they acDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
Courts are an important way for citizens to enforce their rights, even if they access them only on rare occasions.97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkIt is important for citizens to know about their legal rights and responsibilitiIt is important for citizens to know about their legal rights and responsibilitiIt is important for citizens to know about their legal rights and responsibilitiIt is important for citizens to know about their legal rights and responsibilitiIt is important for citizens to know about their legal rights and responsibilitiDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
It is important for citizens to know about their legal rights and responsibilities.97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkLaws act as a restraint on behaviour of the rich and powerfulLaws act as a restraint on behaviour of the rich and powerfulLaws act as a restraint on behaviour of the rich and powerfulLaws act as a restraint on behaviour of the rich and powerfulLaws act as a restraint on behaviour of the rich and powerfulDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
Laws act as a restraint on behaviour of the rich and powerful.97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkIt is better to settle disputes by negotiating than going to courtIt is better to settle disputes by negotiating than going to courtIt is better to settle disputes by negotiating than going to courtIt is better to settle disputes by negotiating than going to courtIt is better to settle disputes by negotiating than going to courtDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
It is better to settle disputes by negotiating than going to court.97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkIt should be the responsibility of the state to provide free legal assistance toIt should be the responsibility of the state to provide free legal assistance toIt should be the responsibility of the state to provide free legal assistance toIt should be the responsibility of the state to provide free legal assistance toIt should be the responsibility of the state to provide free legal assistance toDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
It should be the responsibility of the state to provide free legal assistance to citizens in need, regardless of how few people access it.97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkRecently the service of the police has improvedRecently the service of the police has improvedRecently the service of the police has improvedRecently the service of the police has improvedRecently the service of the police has improvedDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
Recently the service of the police has improved97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkInstead of the existing secular laws shariah laws should be followedInstead of the existing secular laws shariah laws should be followedInstead of the existing secular laws shariah laws should be followedInstead of the existing secular laws shariah laws should be followedInstead of the existing secular laws shariah laws should be followedDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
Instead of the existing secular laws, Shariah laws should be followed.97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkBecause of ngo legal services many more women can access redress for domestic viBecause of ngo legal services many more women can access redress for domestic viBecause of ngo legal services many more women can access redress for domestic viBecause of ngo legal services many more women can access redress for domestic viBecause of ngo legal services many more women can access redress for domestic viDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
Because of NGO legal services, many more women can access redress for domestic violence now than 25 years ago.97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkThe poor get justice from allah not from the existing formal or informal systemsThe poor get justice from allah not from the existing formal or informal systemsThe poor get justice from allah not from the existing formal or informal systemsThe poor get justice from allah not from the existing formal or informal systemsThe poor get justice from allah not from the existing formal or informal systemsDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
The poor get justice from Allah, not from the existing formal or informal systems.97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkI feel more secure now than i did ten years agoI feel more secure now than i did ten years agoI feel more secure now than i did ten years agoI feel more secure now than i did ten years agoI feel more secure now than i did ten years agoDo you strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree with the following statements?
I feel more secure now than I did ten years ago97531Strongly agree2Agree3Disagree4Strongly disagree8DkInterview ending hourInterview ending hourInterview ending hourInterview ending hourInterview ending hourInterview ending time975319913.3053.579Interview ending minuteInterview ending minuteInterview ending minuteInterview ending minuteInterview ending minuteInterview ending time97539929.97418.258Respondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sex97531Male2FemaleRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weight97530.02585.12610.44348662671234567Sysmiss9753129753310056.1117.68197531239645108123Sysmiss9628125123Sysmiss9626127123Sysmiss9608145123Sysmiss9629124123SysmissHh id numberHh id numberHh id numberHh id numberHh id number56281020357095Cluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster numberCluster number56281357Household numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold numberHousehold number56281601The most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhIf the interviewee or his/her HH members experienced more than one incident in last 7 years (from 2002 until now), then write about the most serious incident affecting the interviewer and the HH [write the code from Q6]56284741015Q7.1 number of perpetratorsQ7.1 number of perpetratorsQ7.1 number of perpetratorsQ7.1 number of perpetratorsQ7.1 number of perpetratorsNumber of perpetrators
[if the respondent does not know, put 88, if institution is a perpetrator, then write 77]5628199Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Q7.2 did you know main perpetrator before the incident took place?Did you know main perpetrator (or the person responsible for the incident) before the incident took place?5610181Yes2No8Not appliacbleSysmissQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youQ7.3 if the main perpetrator is known then what is his/her relationship to youIf the main perpetrator is known, then what is his/her relationship to you (the victim)?344821801Own hh member or members2Close relatives3Distant relatives/other household member or members4Unknown but a familiar person seen in your area5Known person from your area6Member of a gang7Government999OthersSysmissQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorQ7.4 sex of the main perpetratorSex344821801Male2Female8Not applicableSysmissQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorQ7.5 age of the main perpetratorAge (approximate)34482180299Q7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorQ7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorQ7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorQ7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorQ7.6a wealth status of main perpetratorSocial category of perpetrator
a. Wealth status344821801Higher than respondent2Same as respondent3Lower than respondent7Dont knowSysmissQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorQ7.6b political affiliation of main perpetratorSocial category of perpetrator
b. Political affiliation (two codes apply)344821801Active supporter/cadre of ruling party2Active supporter/cadre of opposition3Not known to be affiliated7Dont knowSysmissQ8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?Q8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?Q8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?Q8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?Q8.1during the incident did any damage to your hhs property take place?During the incident, did any damage to your HH's property take place?56281Yes2NoLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?
CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)36701958123456789103555SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?
CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)76555212345678917SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?
CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)1256161234578SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?
CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5562316SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?
CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5628SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?
CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5628SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?
CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5628SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?
CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5628SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?
CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5628SysmissLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toLine number who did the damaged property belong toWho did the damaged property belong to?
CODE ALL THAT APPLY
(enter Line No from HH roster; In case of whole HH enter 55, if the victim does not live in the HH now, e.g, is abroad or dead then write 00)5628SysmissQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersQ8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?Q8.3 what property was damaged?What property was damaged?CODE ALL THAT APPLY56281Car/van2Motorcycle/scooter/moped/bicycle/rickshaw3Property inside the home or flat4Outside of home or flat5Fences walls gates or items in the garden6Harvest7Domestic animals8Fishing pond9Electronics10Cash11Agricultural machinery12Agricultural inputs99OthersWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damageWhat was the total value of the damage (in equivalent taka)3691193710099999998What was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your hhs monthly income when your property damagedWhat was your/ your HH's monthly income when your property damaged.3691193797300000Did this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]4425186No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]4985130No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]215607No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]105618No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]325596No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]795549No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]3245304No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]7114917No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]165612No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]4055223No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]1965432No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]3895239No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersSysmissDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your hhldDid this incident have any economic/livelihood impact on your HH?[CODE ALL THAT APPLY]5628No economic/livelihood impact1Stopped business2Stopped new investment3Moved the business to another location4Hired/paid private organizations/individuals to protect/secu5Changed business6Changed/quit jobs7Reduced current or lifetime income for hh due to member bein8Reduced household income due to crop damage from environment9Time, cost or relocation costs associated with landlord/tena10Costs of settling land/property disputes11Compensation not given on land expropriated by government or12Money/land lost due to divorce/separation disputes or inheri99OthersWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]56281Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]56281Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]56281Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]56281Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]56281Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9OtherWhat were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your hh?What were the other consequences of this incident for you/your HH?[Code all that apply]56281Physical harm to family member2Distress and worry3Loss of social respect or family name4Restricted mobility of the hh members5Stopped sending children to school9Other56281562815628156281562815628156281562815628156281562815628156281562856285628256281562815628156281562815628156281562815628156281562815628156281562815628562835628156281562815628156281562815628156281562815628156281562815628156281562815628456281562815628156281562815628156281562815628156281562815628156285628562856285562815628256283562845628556286562875628856289562810562811562812562813562814562815562816562817562818562819562820562821562822562823562824562825562826562827562828562829562830562831562832562833562834562835562836562837562838562839562840Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.1)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.1)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.1)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.1)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.1)Actions taken5628911Talked to the perpetrator/other sideQ9.1.1a whether talked to the perpetrator/other sideQ9.1.1a whether talked to the perpetrator/other sideQ9.1.1a whether talked to the perpetrator/other sideQ9.1.1a whether talked to the perpetrator/other sideQ9.1.1a whether talked to the perpetrator/other sideTalked to the perpetrator/other side56281Yes2No9Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.2)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.2)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.2)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.2)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.2)Actions taken5628912Sought help from own family membersQ9.1.2a whether sought help from own family membersQ9.1.2a whether sought help from own family membersQ9.1.2a whether sought help from own family membersQ9.1.2a whether sought help from own family membersQ9.1.2a whether sought help from own family members56281Yes2NoActed alone or with help of family member (q9.1.3)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.3)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.3)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.3)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.3)Actions taken5628913Threatened the perpetratorQ9.1.3a threatened the perpetratorQ9.1.3a threatened the perpetratorQ9.1.3a threatened the perpetratorQ9.1.3a threatened the perpetratorQ9.1.3a threatened the perpetrator56281Yes2NoActed alone or with help of family member (q9.1.4)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.4)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.4)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.4)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.4)Actions taken5628914Took direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her pQ9.1.4a whether took direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her propeQ9.1.4a whether took direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her propeQ9.1.4a whether took direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her propeQ9.1.4a whether took direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her propeQ9.1.4a whether took direct action against perpetrator by damaging his/her prope56281Yes2NoActed alone or with help of family member (q9.1.5)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.5)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.5)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.5)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.5)Actions taken5628915Took direct physical action against perpetrator by using vioQ9.1.5a whether took direct physical action against perpetrator by using violencQ9.1.5a whether took direct physical action against perpetrator by using violencQ9.1.5a whether took direct physical action against perpetrator by using violencQ9.1.5a whether took direct physical action against perpetrator by using violencQ9.1.5a whether took direct physical action against perpetrator by using violenc56281Yes2NoActed alone or with help of family member (q9.1.6)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.6)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.6)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.6)Acted alone or with help of family member (q9.1.6)Actions taken5628916Took direct action against perpetrator by using non-violentQ9.1.6a whether took direct action against perpetrator by using non-violent methQ9.1.6a whether took direct action against perpetrator by using non-violent methQ9.1.6a whether took direct action against perpetrator by using non-violent methQ9.1.6a whether took direct action against perpetrator by using non-violent methQ9.1.6a whether took direct action against perpetrator by using non-violent meth56281Yes2NoLocal leader (q9.2.1)Local leader (q9.2.1)Local leader (q9.2.1)Local leader (q9.2.1)Local leader (q9.2.1)Actions taken56271921Went to a local political leader (up chairman/member other)SysmissQ9.2.1a whether went to a local political leader (up chairman/member otherQ9.2.1a whether went to a local political leader (up chairman/member otherQ9.2.1a whether went to a local political leader (up chairman/member otherQ9.2.1a whether went to a local political leader (up chairman/member otherQ9.2.1a whether went to a local political leader (up chairman/member otherWent to a local political leader (UP chairman/member, other) [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoQ9.2.1b whyQ9.2.1b whyQ9.2.1b whyQ9.2.1b whyQ9.2.1b whyWhy did you go?227833501For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissLocal leader (q9.2.2)Local leader (q9.2.2)Local leader (q9.2.2)Local leader (q9.2.2)Local leader (q9.2.2)Actions taken56271922Went to a religious leaderSysmissQ9.2.2a whether went to a religious leaderQ9.2.2a whether went to a religious leaderQ9.2.2a whether went to a religious leaderQ9.2.2a whether went to a religious leaderQ9.2.2a whether went to a religious leaderWent to a religious leader [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoQ9.2.2b whyQ9.2.2b whyQ9.2.2b whyQ9.2.2b whyQ9.2.2b whyWhy did you go?13154971For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissLocal leader (q9.2.3)Local leader (q9.2.3)Local leader (q9.2.3)Local leader (q9.2.3)Local leader (q9.2.3)Actions taken56271923Went to local unelected community leaderSysmissQ9.2.3a whether went to local unelected community leaderQ9.2.3a whether went to local unelected community leaderQ9.2.3a whether went to local unelected community leaderQ9.2.3a whether went to local unelected community leaderQ9.2.3a whether went to local unelected community leaderWent to local unelected community leader [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoQ9.2.3b whyQ9.2.3b whyQ9.2.3b whyQ9.2.3b whyQ9.2.3b whyWhy did you go?43251961For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissLocal leader (q9.2.4)Local leader (q9.2.4)Local leader (q9.2.4)Local leader (q9.2.4)Local leader (q9.2.4)Actions taken56271924Went to employer or landlordSysmissQ9.2.4a whether went to employer or landlordQ9.2.4a whether went to employer or landlordQ9.2.4a whether went to employer or landlordQ9.2.4a whether went to employer or landlordQ9.2.4a whether went to employer or landlordWent to employer or landlord [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoQ9.2.4b whyQ9.2.4b whyQ9.2.4b whyQ9.2.4b whyQ9.2.4b whyWhy did you go?10255261For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissLocal leader (q9.2.5)Local leader (q9.2.5)Local leader (q9.2.5)Local leader (q9.2.5)Local leader (q9.2.5)Actions taken5628925Requested a village shalishQ9.2.5a whether requested a village shalishQ9.2.5a whether requested a village shalishQ9.2.5a whether requested a village shalishQ9.2.5a whether requested a village shalishQ9.2.5a whether requested a village shalishRequested a village shalish[go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoQ9.2.5b whyQ9.2.5b whyQ9.2.5b whyQ9.2.5b whyQ9.2.5b whyWhy did you go?97446541For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissLocal leader (q9.2.6)Local leader (q9.2.6)Local leader (q9.2.6)Local leader (q9.2.6)Local leader (q9.2.6)Actions taken56271926Went to the local mpSysmissQ9.2.6a whether went to the local mpQ9.2.6a whether went to the local mpQ9.2.6a whether went to the local mpQ9.2.6a whether went to the local mpQ9.2.6a whether went to the local mpWent to the local MP [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoQ9.2.6b whyQ9.2.6b whyQ9.2.6b whyQ9.2.6b whyQ9.2.6b whyWhy did you go?8855401For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissLaw enforcement agencies (9.3.1)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.1)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.1)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.1)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.1)Actions taken56271931Threatened the other side with legal actionSysmissQ9.3.1a whether threatened the other side with legal actionQ9.3.1a whether threatened the other side with legal actionQ9.3.1a whether threatened the other side with legal actionQ9.3.1a whether threatened the other side with legal actionQ9.3.1a whether threatened the other side with legal actionThreatened the other side with legal action [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2NoLaw enforcement agencies (9.3.2)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.2)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.2)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.2)Law enforcement agencies (9.3.2)Actions taken56271932Went to the policeSysmissQ9.3.2a whether went to the policeQ9.3.2a whether went to the policeQ9.3.2a whether went to the policeQ9.3.2a whether went to the policeQ9.3.2a whether went to the policeWent to the police (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)56281Yes2NoQ9.3.2b whyQ9.3.2b whyQ9.3.2b whyQ9.3.2b whyQ9.3.2b whyWhy did you go?99946291For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeQ9.3.2c reason for going/not going to policeThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/leg4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fairl8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no community23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissLaw enforcement agencies (q9.3.3)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.3)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.3)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.3)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.3)Actions taken56271933Went to rabSysmissQ9.3.3a whether went to rabQ9.3.3a whether went to rabQ9.3.3a whether went to rabQ9.3.3a whether went to rabQ9.3.3a whether went to rabWent to RAB (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)56281Yes2No9Q9.3.3b whyQ9.3.3b whyQ9.3.3b whyQ9.3.3b whyQ9.3.3b whyWhy did you go?4555831For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in future9SysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabQ9.3.3c reason for going/not going to rabThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know'98Not applicable99OtherSysmissLaw enforcement agencies (q9.3.4)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.4)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.4)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.4)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.4)Actions taken56271934Went to army/joint force campSysmissQ9.3.4a whether went to army/joint force campQ9.3.4a whether went to army/joint force campQ9.3.4a whether went to army/joint force campQ9.3.4a whether went to army/joint force campQ9.3.4a whether went to army/joint force campWent to army/joint force camp (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)56281Yes2No9Q9.3.4b whyQ9.3.4b whyQ9.3.4b whyQ9.3.4b whyQ9.3.4b whyWhy did you go?5055781For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campQ9.3.4c reason for going/not going to army/joint force campThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissLaw enforcement agencies (q9.3.5)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.5)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.5)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.5)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.5)Actions taken56271935Sought legal advice from a private lawyerSysmissQ9.3.5a whether sought legal advice from a private lawyerQ9.3.5a whether sought legal advice from a private lawyerQ9.3.5a whether sought legal advice from a private lawyerQ9.3.5a whether sought legal advice from a private lawyerQ9.3.5a whether sought legal advice from a private lawyerSought legal advice from a private lawyer [go to the next question if answered 2]56281Yes2No9Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.6)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.6)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.6)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.6)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.6)Actions taken56271936Went to a village courtSysmissQ9.3.6a whether went to a village courtQ9.3.6a whether went to a village courtQ9.3.6a whether went to a village courtQ9.3.6a whether went to a village courtQ9.3.6a whether went to a village courtWent to a Village Court (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)56281Yes2NoQ9.3.6b whyQ9.3.6b whyQ9.3.6b whyQ9.3.6b whyQ9.3.6b whyWhy did you go?23253961For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtQ9.3.6c reason for going/not going to village courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissLaw enforcement agenciesLaw enforcement agenciesLaw enforcement agenciesLaw enforcement agenciesLaw enforcement agenciesActions taken56271937Sought advice of government legal aidSysmissQ9.3.7a whether sought legal advice from law enforcement agenciesQ9.3.7a whether sought legal advice from law enforcement agenciesQ9.3.7a whether sought legal advice from law enforcement agenciesQ9.3.7a whether sought legal advice from law enforcement agenciesQ9.3.7a whether sought legal advice from law enforcement agencies56281Yes2No9Q9.3.7b whyQ9.3.7b whyQ9.3.7b whyQ9.3.7b whyQ9.3.7b whyWhy did you go?18254461For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in future9SysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidQ9.3.7c reason for going/not going to govt legal aidThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissLaw enforcement agencies (q9.3.8)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.8)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.8)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.8)Law enforcement agencies (q9.3.8)Actions taken5628938Went to courtQ9.3.8a whether went to courtQ9.3.8a whether went to courtQ9.3.8a whether went to courtQ9.3.8a whether went to courtQ9.3.8a whether went to courtWent to court (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)56281Yes2No9Q9.3.8b whyQ9.3.8b whyQ9.3.8b whyQ9.3.8b whyQ9.3.8b whyWhy did you go?88647421For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtQ9.3.8c reason for going/not going to courtThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissNgo (q9.4.1)Ngo (q9.4.1)Ngo (q9.4.1)Ngo (q9.4.1)Ngo (q9.4.1)Actions taken56262941Went to an ngo legal aid service for assistanceSysmissQ9.4.1a whether went to an ngo legal aid service for assistanceQ9.4.1a whether went to an ngo legal aid service for assistanceQ9.4.1a whether went to an ngo legal aid service for assistanceQ9.4.1a whether went to an ngo legal aid service for assistanceQ9.4.1a whether went to an ngo legal aid service for assistanceWent to an NGO legal aid service for assistance(If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)562711Yes2No9SysmissQ9.4.1b whyQ9.4.1b whyQ9.4.1b whyQ9.4.1b whyQ9.4.1b whyWhy did you go?4455841For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoQ9.4.1c reason for going/not going to ngoThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562261Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissGovt official (q9.5.1)Govt official (q9.5.1)Govt official (q9.5.1)Govt official (q9.5.1)Govt official (q9.5.1)Actions taken56271951Went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrativeSysmissQ9.5.1a whether went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrative offiQ9.5.1a whether went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrative offiQ9.5.1a whether went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrative offiQ9.5.1a whether went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrative offiQ9.5.1a whether went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrative offiWent to the Upazila Nirhabi Officer or other administrative official (If answered 2 then skip b and go to c)562711Yes2No9SysmissQ9.5.1b whyQ9.5.1b whyQ9.5.1b whyQ9.5.1b whyQ9.5.1b whyWhy did you go?15354751For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562081Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerQ9.5.1c reason for going/not going to upazila nirbahi officerThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562351Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissNothing (q9.6)Nothing (q9.6)Nothing (q9.6)Nothing (q9.6)Nothing (q9.6)Actions taken5627196Did nothingSysmissDid nothingDid nothingDid nothingDid nothingDid nothingDid nothing56281Yes2No389Others (q9.7)Others (q9.7)Others (q9.7)Others (q9.7)Others (q9.7)Actions taken5627197OtherSysmissQ9.7a whether went to other persons or institutionQ9.7a whether went to other persons or institutionQ9.7a whether went to other persons or institutionQ9.7a whether went to other persons or institutionQ9.7a whether went to other persons or institutionOther (specify)562711Yes2NoSysmissQ9.7b whyQ9.7b whyQ9.7b whyQ9.7b whyQ9.7b whyWhy did you go?14654821For advice only2For mediation only3Both for advice and mediation4To seek legal redress in the courts?5For personal security in futureSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior561991Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior562171Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherSysmissQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toQ9.7c reason for going/not going toThe reasons for going/not going to an institution /advantages/disadvantages/behavior56281Grievances were heard appropriately2The dispute resolution mechanism has been very prompt3The dispute resolution mechanism has access to technical/le4The dispute resolution mechanism is impartial5The judges/mediators are competent to understand the law6The judges/mediators are competent to understand the commun7The judges/mediators are competent in applying the law fair8Enforcement of the decision takes place through a combinati9The system is financially affordable10Physical access to system is easy (close by)11The system is familiar to me12I have confidence in the fairness of the process13I have confidence in outcomes14I never heard of about this institution15Grievances were not heard appropriately16The dispute resolution mechanism has been very lengthy17The dispute resolution mechanism has no access to technical/18The dispute resolution mechanism is not impartial19The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the law20The judges/mediators are incompetent to understand the commu21The judges/mediators are incompetent in applying the law fai22Community does not get involved in enforcement (no communit23The system is financially too costly24Physical access to system is difficult (involving travel)25The system is unfamiliar to me26I have no confidence in the fairness of the process27I have no confidence in outcomes88Donot know98Not applicable99OtherRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sexRespondent sex56281Male2FemaleRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weightRespondent weight56280.02585.126Name of ngoName of ngoName of ngoName of ngoName of ngo56281Brac2Proshika3Asha4Grameen somaj kalyan somity5Grameen bank8Never goes to ngoMain reason for choosing this ngoMain reason for choosing this ngoMain reason for choosing this ngoMain reason for choosing this ngoMain reason for choosing this ngoWhy did you choose this NGO over others? [Record up to 3 reasons]3455941Acquaintaces in the ngo2Fair end and impartial trial3Speedy trial4Less experience/ free of change5Ngo office in the area6Provides legal aid7Accesseble8Provision for dispursing loans9Permanent role in settling disputes10Pays compensation for damages11Works toward peoples welfare like installation of filters in12Blank13Blank14Blank15OthersSysmissSecond reason for choosing this ngoSecond reason for choosing this ngoSecond reason for choosing this ngoSecond reason for choosing this ngoSecond reason for choosing this ngoWhy did you choose this NGO over others? [Record up to 3 reasons]1956091Acquaintaces in the ngo2Fair end and impartial trial3Speedy trial4Less experience/ free of change5Ngo office in the area6Provides legal aid7Accesseble8Provision for dispursing loans9Permanent role in settling disputes10Pays compensation for damages11Works toward peoples welfare like installation of filters in12Blank13Blank14Blank15OthersSysmissThird reason for choosing this ngoThird reason for choosing this ngoThird reason for choosing this ngoThird reason for choosing this ngoThird reason for choosing this ngoWhy did you choose this NGO over others? [Record up to 3 reasons]556231Acquaintaces in the ngo2Fair end and impartial trial3Speedy trial4Less experience/ free of change5Ngo office in the area6Provides legal aid7Accesseble8Provision for dispursing loans9Permanent role in settling disputes10Pays compensation for damages11Works toward peoples welfare like installation of filters in12Blank13Blank14Blank15OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]23153971It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]20954191It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]14054881It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]37352551It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]456241It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]6355651It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]3955891It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]6155671It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]7155571It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]11355151It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]4755811It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]856201It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]656221It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]156271It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]36452641It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionReasons for not going to any institutionIf you did not do anything despite experiencing the incident, why was that?[Code all that apply]11155171It would cost more than i can afford2It would take too much time3I did not know where to go4It was not very important5Thought the other person was right6Thought the other person was more influential7Fear of reprisal by offenders8Would damage the relationship with the other party9Would damage my familys reputation10It was a private or family matter11No material loss/damage took place12Previous bad experience with traditional shalish13Previous bad experience with courts and police14Previous bad experience with ngo legal services15It would be useless anyway/poor person - hopelessness intern99OthersSysmissWhich institution played most important role(q13.1)Which institution played most important role(q13.1)Which institution played most important role(q13.1)Which institution played most important role(q13.1)Which institution played most important role(q13.1)If the respondent went to more than one institution, which played the most important role in dispute resolution?[See section C, 9.3, 9.4 and 9.5 and write the line number from Q9]
(Write from section C Q91592403696Did nothing931Threatened the other side with legal action932Went to the police933Went to rab934Went to army/joint force camp935Sought legal advice from a private lawyer936Went to a village court937Sought advice of government legal aid938Went to court941Went to an ngo legal aid service for assistance951Went to the upazila nirhabi officer or other administrativeSysmissExpectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)What did/do you hope to achieve from this institution?[record all that apply]56281A fair application of the law to my dispute/grievance2Revenge3Right to property/asset4Apology from the disputant'5Monetary compensation9OtherExpectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)What did/do you hope to achieve from this institution?[record all that apply]56281A fair application of the law to my dispute/grievance2Revenge3Right to property/asset4Apology from the disputant'5Monetary compensation9OtherExpectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)What did/do you hope to achieve from this institution?[record all that apply]56281A fair application of the law to my dispute/grievance2Revenge3Right to property/asset4Apology from the disputant'5Monetary compensation9OtherExpectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)What did/do you hope to achieve from this institution?[record all that apply]56281A fair application of the law to my dispute/grievance2Revenge3Right to property/asset4Apology from the disputant'5Monetary compensation9OtherExpectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)What did/do you hope to achieve from this institution?[record all that apply]56281A fair application of the law to my dispute/grievance2Revenge3Right to property/asset4Apology from the disputant'5Monetary compensation9OtherExpectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)Expectation to achieve from this institution(q13.2)What did/do you hope to achieve from this institution?[record all that apply]56281A fair application of the law to my dispute/grievance2Revenge3Right to property/asset4Apology from the disputant'5Monetary compensation9Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3'source of information about these institutions '. Q13.3Source of information about these institutions[record all that apply]56281Respondent knew about it2Close relatives3Distant relative/friends/neighbors4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Newspaper12Electronic media13Religious leader99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99Other'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)'who were the main actors participating in these institutions (q13_4)Who were the main actors participating in these institutions?[record all that apply]56281Relatives and neighbors2Common village dwellers3Local mp4Local land-based elites5Local business elites6Local professional elites7Local political elites8Elected local representatives9Ngo10Government officials11Religious leaders12Lawyers13Other court officials14Police15Judge16Community police99OtherWhether understand the procedure that the institutions followedWhether understand the procedure that the institutions followedWhether understand the procedure that the institutions followedWhether understand the procedure that the institutions followedWhether understand the procedure that the institutions followedDid you understand the procedure that the institutions followed?159240361Yes2No9SysmissWere the procedures easy/difficult to understandWere the procedures easy/difficult to understandWere the procedures easy/difficult to understandWere the procedures easy/difficult to understandWere the procedures easy/difficult to understandWere the procedures easy/difficult to understand?159240361Easy2Difficult9SysmissAny one explained about the procedureAny one explained about the procedureAny one explained about the procedureAny one explained about the procedureAny one explained about the procedureDid someone explain them to you/answer your questions about the procedure?159240361Yes2No9SysmissBoth the parties get a chance to tell their sideBoth the parties get a chance to tell their sideBoth the parties get a chance to tell their sideBoth the parties get a chance to tell their sideBoth the parties get a chance to tell their sideDid both the parties get a chance to tell their side?159240361Both parties got a chance2Only i got a chance3Only the other party got a chance8Not applicable9SysmissThe procedure that the institution followed fairThe procedure that the institution followed fairThe procedure that the institution followed fairThe procedure that the institution followed fairThe procedure that the institution followed fairDid you think that the procedure that the institution followed fair?159240361Yes2No7Dont know9SysmissThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsDo you think that the police/shalishkars/lawyers/judges consider/understand
a) the relevant laws159240361Yes2No7Dont know9SysmissThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsThe police/shalishkarsDo you think that the police/shalishkars/lawyers/judges consider/understand
b) community norms [related to your case]?159240361Yes2No7Dont know9SysmissThe outcome was fair as per respondent's opinionThe outcome was fair as per respondent's opinionThe outcome was fair as per respondent's opinionThe outcome was fair as per respondent's opinionThe outcome was fair as per respondent's opinionDo you think the outcome was fair?159240361Yes2No3Not resolved yet9SysmissThe outcome was fair as per communities' opinionThe outcome was fair as per communities' opinionThe outcome was fair as per communities' opinionThe outcome was fair as per communities' opinionThe outcome was fair as per communities' opinionDid the community think that the outcome was fair?159240361Yes2No3Not resolved yet7Dont know9SysmissWilling to go to the same institution for any future problemWilling to go to the same institution for any future problemWilling to go to the same institution for any future problemWilling to go to the same institution for any future problemWilling to go to the same institution for any future problemWould you go to the same institution for any future problem?159240361Yes2No7Dont know9SysmissDispute was settledDispute was settledDispute was settledDispute was settledDispute was settledHas the dispute been settled?437712511Yes2No9SysmissTime taken between reporting the incident and the settlementTime taken between reporting the incident and the settlementTime taken between reporting the incident and the settlementTime taken between reporting the incident and the settlementTime taken between reporting the incident and the settlementIf answered yes in Q14.1, time taken between reporting the incident and the settlement (in months)11204508198 'the case is still going on'234567891011121314151618192021222425282930343642444548516070727884959899SysmissAmont of money spent to resolve this dispute for court fees and other legal expeAmont of money spent to resolve this dispute for court fees and other legal expeAmont of money spent to resolve this dispute for court fees and other legal expeAmont of money spent to resolve this dispute for court fees and other legal expeAmont of money spent to resolve this dispute for court fees and other legal expea) How much money (approx) did you spend to resolve this dispute for court fees and other legal expenses?437712515102029303650981001251501772002503003203503603653704004505005256007007208008509001000110012001400150016001800190020002100250026002800300032003500400042004500500055006000700072007500800090001000011000120001225013000135001400015000160001800020000220002400025000270002800030000320003300034000350003730040000420004400044700450004800050000518005400055000560006000065000700007500080000840008500090000100000110000115000120000130000150000160000200000250000300000400000500000800000999998No expenses1000000900000099999989999999899999999SysmissAmount spent to resolve this dispute as bribe or speed moneyAmount spent to resolve this dispute as bribe or speed moneyAmount spent to resolve this dispute as bribe or speed moneyAmount spent to resolve this dispute as bribe or speed moneyAmount spent to resolve this dispute as bribe or speed moneyb) How much money (approx) did you spend to resolve this dispute as bribe or speed money?43771251151950100150200250300400500600700800900100011601200130014001500160020002200250026002650300032003500360037004000450050005500600065007000800090001000011000120001300014000150001600017000180001900020000210002500027000290003000033000350003600040000450004700050000600006500070000800008500090000100000110000120000125000130000140000150000170000200000220000225000240000250000300000350000400000500000600000999998No expenses10000001300000200000099999989999999899999999SysmissAmount spent to resolve this dispute as other expensesAmount spent to resolve this dispute as other expensesAmount spent to resolve this dispute as other expensesAmount spent to resolve this dispute as other expensesAmount spent to resolve this dispute as other expensesc) How much money (approx) did you spend to resolve this dispute as other expenses (e.g conveyance, food etc)43771251203040507580100110150190200240300400450500520600650700800900970100010221050120014001500170018002000210022002400250028003000342935003600380040004500500055006000700072008000830090009300100001020012000130001400015000160001700018000200002200023000240002500027000290003000035000360003800040000440004500047000480004900050000600006500070000750008000090000100000110000120000130000150000200000400000480000500000900000999998No expenses11000009999999899999999SysmissAmount recovered through the dispute settlementAmount recovered through the dispute settlementAmount recovered through the dispute settlementAmount recovered through the dispute settlementAmount recovered through the dispute settlement(d) How much money did you recover through the dispute settlement, if any?4377125139610020029030040050058059570080010001200150020003000350040004500500058006000700080001000011000140001500015500160001700020000220002500030000360004000044000450005000060000620006600070000800008500090000100000158000175000185000200000240000300000400000500000900000999998No money was recovered1000000150000050000009999999899999999SysmissWhether complied with the decisionWhether complied with the decisionWhether complied with the decisionWhether complied with the decisionWhether complied with the decisionDid you comply with the decision (if answered yes to Q14.1)?437712511Yes2No3Not resolved yet9SysmissMain reason for complianceMain reason for complianceMain reason for complianceMain reason for complianceMain reason for complianceWhat are the reasons for compliance compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]107645521No other alternative2Vetict was right/impartial3Got the metre/line for paying bill/money4Accepted the verdict for peace in the area/will be in troubl5Accepted the verdict due to political/influential/local elit6Freed from jail through speed money/bribe7Verdict was in my favour8Forgave opponents as they were helpless9Case dimissed following name being removed from charge sheet10End of misunderstanding between the two parties11Accepted the dessision of devorce for own safety12Accepted the verdict as the incident was among ourselves13Settled the dispute through dowry/alimony14Opponents withdrew the case15Accepted the verdict in exchange of money/land90Others97Dk98NaSysmissSecond reason for complianceSecond reason for complianceSecond reason for complianceSecond reason for complianceSecond reason for complianceWhat are the reasons for compliance compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]2856001No other alternative2Vetict was right/impartial3Got the metre/line for paying bill/money4Accepted the verdict for peace in the area/will be in troubl5Accepted the verdict due to political/influential/local elit6Freed from jail through speed money/bribe7Verdict was in my favour8Forgave opponents as they were helpless9Case dimissed following name being removed from charge sheet10End of misunderstanding between the two parties11Accepted the dessision of devorce for own safety12Accepted the verdict as the incident was among ourselves13Settled the dispute through dowry/alimony14Opponents withdrew the case15Accepted the verdict in exchange of money/land90Others97Dk98NaSysmissThird reason for complianceThird reason for complianceThird reason for complianceThird reason for complianceThird reason for complianceWhat are the reasons for compliance compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]156271No other alternative2Vetict was right/impartial3Got the metre/line for paying bill/money4Accepted the verdict for peace in the area/will be in troubl5Accepted the verdict due to political/influential/local elit6Freed from jail through speed money/bribe7Verdict was in my favour8Forgave opponents as they were helpless9Case dimissed following name being removed from charge sheet10End of misunderstanding between the two parties11Accepted the dessision of devorce for own safety12Accepted the verdict as the incident was among ourselves13Settled the dispute through dowry/alimony14Opponents withdrew the case15Accepted the verdict in exchange of money/land90Others97Dk98NaSysmissMain reason for non-complianceMain reason for non-complianceMain reason for non-complianceMain reason for non-complianceMain reason for non-complianceWhat are the reasons for non-compliance compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]1656121Felt that it was corruption with the adjudication being wron2Forced to accept through pressure of the chairman/administra3Land not sold as the valid deed/documents are with me as wel4Trial was unfair5Judgement not accepted as verdict was not in my favour6Saw another doctor for not being to pay the fee90Others97Dk98NaSysmissSecond reason for non-complianceSecond reason for non-complianceSecond reason for non-complianceSecond reason for non-complianceSecond reason for non-complianceWhat are the reasons for non-compliance compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]256261Felt that it was corruption with the adjudication being wron2Forced to accept through pressure of the chairman/administra3Land not sold as the valid deed/documents are with me as wel4Trial was unfair5Judgement not accepted as verdict was not in my favour6Saw another doctor for not being to pay the fee90Others97Dk98NaSysmissThird reason for non-complianceThird reason for non-complianceThird reason for non-complianceThird reason for non-complianceThird reason for non-complianceWhat are the reasons for non-compliance compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]156271Felt that it was corruption with the adjudication being wron2Forced to accept through pressure of the chairman/administra3Land not sold as the valid deed/documents are with me as wel4Trial was unfair5Judgement not accepted as verdict was not in my favour6Saw another doctor for not being to pay the fee90Others97Dk98NaSysmissWhether the other party comply with the decisionWhether the other party comply with the decisionWhether the other party comply with the decisionWhether the other party comply with the decisionWhether the other party comply with the decisionDid the other party comply with the decision?111845101Yes2No79SysmissMain reasons for the other party's complianceMain reasons for the other party's complianceMain reasons for the other party's complianceMain reasons for the other party's complianceMain reasons for the other party's complianceWhat are the reasons for the other party's compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]105445741Doctor provided proper care for being paid the fee2Accepted the verdict in exchange of bribes3Verdict was in my favour4Opponerts accepted the verdict after understanding their mis5Settled in thana/police station6Work stopped due to non-payment of bribe7Thief has been canght8Accepted the verdict for judgement being fair9Did not have to pay money as he was forgiven10Accepted the judgement as our demand was right11They accepted the verdict for beign paid12End of misunderstanding between the two parties13Was willing to cut relations14Accepted the verdict as the incident was among ourselves15Accepted the verdict due to the presurre of elites16Settled through payment of money17Did not provide care for probility to pay the fee90Others97Dk98NaSysmissSecond reasons for the other party's complianceSecond reasons for the other party's complianceSecond reasons for the other party's complianceSecond reasons for the other party's complianceSecond reasons for the other party's complianceWhat are the reasons for the other party's compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]1156171Doctor provided proper care for being paid the fee2Accepted the verdict in exchange of bribes3Verdict was in my favour4Opponerts accepted the verdict after understanding their mis5Settled in thana/police station6Work stopped due to non-payment of bribe7Thief has been canght8Accepted the verdict for judgement being fair9Did not have to pay money as he was forgiven10Accepted the judgement as our demand was right11They accepted the verdict for beign paid12End of misunderstanding between the two parties13Was willing to cut relations14Accepted the verdict as the incident was among ourselves15Accepted the verdict due to the presurre of elites16Settled through payment of money17Did not provide care for probility to pay the fee90Others97Dk98NaSysmissThird reasons for the other party's complianceThird reasons for the other party's complianceThird reasons for the other party's complianceThird reasons for the other party's complianceThird reasons for the other party's complianceWhat are the reasons for the other party's compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]56281Doctor provided proper care for being paid the fee2Accepted the verdict in exchange of bribes3Verdict was in my favour4Opponerts accepted the verdict after understanding their mis5Settled in thana/police station6Work stopped due to non-payment of bribe7Thief has been canght8Accepted the verdict for judgement being fair9Did not have to pay money as he was forgiven10Accepted the judgement as our demand was right11They accepted the verdict for beign paid12End of misunderstanding between the two parties13Was willing to cut relations14Accepted the verdict as the incident was among ourselves15Accepted the verdict due to the presurre of elites16Settled through payment of money17Did not provide care for probility to pay the fee90Others97Dk98NaSysmissMain reason for the other party's non-complianceMain reason for the other party's non-complianceMain reason for the other party's non-complianceMain reason for the other party's non-complianceMain reason for the other party's non-complianceWhat are the reasons for the other party's non-compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]1256161Judgement was not fair/impartial2For verdict not beign in my favour3Targeted for harassment4Didnt accept the verdict as they were influential90Others97Dk98NaSysmissSecond reason for the other party's non-complianceSecond reason for the other party's non-complianceSecond reason for the other party's non-complianceSecond reason for the other party's non-complianceSecond reason for the other party's non-complianceWhat are the reasons for the other party's non-compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]256261Judgement was not fair/impartial2For verdict not beign in my favour3Targeted for harassment4Didnt accept the verdict as they were influential90Others97Dk98NaSysmissThird reason for the other party's non-complianceThird reason for the other party's non-complianceThird reason for the other party's non-complianceThird reason for the other party's non-complianceThird reason for the other party's non-complianceWhat are the reasons for the other party's non-compliance? [record up to 3 reasons]56281Judgement was not fair/impartial2For verdict not beign in my favour3Targeted for harassment4Didnt accept the verdict as they were influential90Others97DK98NASysmiss56281348021481234567Sysmiss562081Sysmiss562081Sysmiss562081Sysmiss561991Sysmiss561991Sysmiss5613151Sysmiss5628135628127042924SysmissThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hhThe most serious incident affecting the the hh56284741015