{"doc_desc":{"title":"Impact Evaluation of Indonesia\u2019s PNPM Generasi Program","idno":"DDI_IDN_2009_PNPM_v01_M_v01_A_PUF","producers":[{"name":"Antonina Redko","abbreviation":"Development Data Group (DECDG)","affiliation":"World Bank","role":"Generation of DDI documentation"}],"prod_date":"2012-07-25","version_statement":{"version":"v01\nFirst version of metadata documentation (July 2012)"}},"study_desc":{"title_statement":{"idno":"IDN_2009_PNPM_v01_M_v01_A_PUF","title":"Impact Evaluation of PNPM Generasi Program 2009-2010","sub_title":"Third Wave","alt_title":"PNPM 2009-10"},"authoring_entity":[{"name":"Susan Wong","affiliation":"World Bank"},{"name":"Junko Onishi","affiliation":"World Bank"},{"name":"Ben Olken","affiliation":"MIT\/JPAL"},{"name":"Ministry of Home Affairs","affiliation":"Government of Indonesia"}],"production_statement":{"funding_agencies":[{"name":"Spanish Impact Evaluation Fund, World Bank","abbreviation":"SIEF","role":""},{"name":"Government of Indonesia","abbreviation":"","role":""}]},"distribution_statement":{"contact":[{"name":"Susan Wong","affiliation":"World Bank","email":"Swong1@worldbank.org","uri":""}]},"series_statement":{"series_name":"Integrated Survey (non-LSMS) [hh\/is]","series_info":"The PNPM Generasi Impact Evaluation project was carried out in three waves. The baseline survey took place from June 2007 to August 2007. The second wave was conducted from October 2008 to January 2009, after 15 to 18 months of Generasi implementation. The third and final evaluation survey was implemented from October 2009 to January 2010 after 27 to 30 months of project implementation. \n\nOver 45,000 household members, village heads, and school and health facility staff were respondents for the third and final round of survey. \n\nThe Generasi project focuses on the following indicators of maternal and child health and educational behavior:\n\nHealth Indicators\n1. Four prenatal care visits\n2. Taking iron tablets during pregnancy\n3. Delivery assisted by a trained professional\n4. Two postnatal care visits\n5. Complete childhood immunizations\n6. Adequate monthly weight increases for infants\n7. Monthly weighing for children under three and biannually for children under five\n8. Vitamin A twice a year for children under five\n\nEducation Indicators\n9. Primary school enrollment of children 6-to-12 years old\n10. Minimum attendance rate of 85 percent for primary school-aged children\n11. Junior secondary school enrollment of children 13-to-15 years old\n12. Minimum attendance rate of 85 percent for junior secondary school-aged children."},"version_statement":{"version":"v01,\nEdited, anonymized datasets"},"study_info":{"abstract":"PNPM Generasi known as the National Community Empowerment Program - Healthy and Smart Generation (Program National Pemberdayaan Masyarakat-Generasi Sehat dan Cerdas) began in mid-2007 in rural areas of five Indonesian provinces selected by the government: West Java, East Java, North Sulawesi, Gorontalo, and Nusa Tenggara Timur. The Generasi project is implemented by Indonesia\u2019s Ministry of Home Affairs, and is funded through government of Indonesia resources, loans from the World Bank and grants from several bilateral donors.\n\nIn Generasi, all participating villages receive a block grant each year to improve education, and maternal and child health in their villages. The village block grants ranged from an average of $8,500 in 2007 up to an average of $18,200 in 2009. \n\nIn order to evaluate the overall impact of Generasi, as well as to separately identify the impact of Generasi's performance incentives, program locations were selected by lottery to form a randomized, controlled field experiment. Each location was randomly allocated to one of two versions of the program: an \"incentivized\" treatment with the pay-for-performance component (treatment A) and an otherwise identical \"non-incentivized\" treatment without the pay-for-performance incentives (treatment B).\n\nThe impact evaluation project was conducted from 2007 until 2010, in three waves. Documented here is the third round, carried out from October 2009 to January 2010.\n\nThe sample for the research covered each of the 300 subdistricts that were included in the original Generasi randomization. In each subdistrict, eight villages were randomly selected (unless the subdistrict had fewer than eight villages, in which case all were selected). Overall, 2,313 villages were sampled in each of the three survey waves. \n\nThe data for the impact analysis was gathered from surveys of households, mothers, health service providers, and school and village officials.","coll_dates":[{"start":"2009-10","end":"2010-01","cycle":""}],"nation":[{"name":"Indonesia","abbreviation":"IDN"}],"geog_coverage":"West Java, East Java, North Sulawesi, Gorontalo, and Nusa Tenggara Timur provinces","analysis_unit":"- Households,\n- Married women, age 16-49,\n- Children age 6-15, respondent: mother of the child,\n- Children age < 3, respondent: mother of the child,\n- Villages,\n- Community health centers (Puskesmas),\n- Village midwives,\n- Village health posts,\n- Junior secondary schools.","data_kind":"Sample survey data [ssd]","notes":"Households: Household roster, deaths in previous 12 months, migration, water\/sanitation, receipt of government poverty programs, participation in non-formal education, consumption, assets, economic shocks, health insurance, morbidity, outpatient care use, social capital, knowledge and participation in PNPM\/KDP activities.\n\nMarried women age 16-49: Fertility history, use of health services during pregnancy, inspection of Generasi coupons (Wave II), family planning, health and education knowledge. \n\nChildren age 6-15: School enrollment, attendance, grade repetition, cost of schooling, scholarships, child labor.\n\nChildren age < 3: Growth monitoring (posyandu), immunization records, inspection of the Generasi coupons (Wave II), motor development (Wave III), breastfeeding and nutritional intake, weight measurement, height measurement (Waves I & III).\n\nHome-based tests: Test of math and reading skills administered at home (separate test for ages 6-12 and ages 13-15) (Waves I & III)\n\nVillage characteristics: Demography of the village, hamlet information, access to health services and schools, economic shocks, access to media, community participation, daily laborer wage rate, development projects in the village (Waves II & III).\n\nCommunity health centers (Puskesmas): Head of facility background, coverage area, budget, staff roster, time allocation of head doctor and midwife coordinator, service hours, services provided, fee schedule, number of patients per service during the previous month, medical and vaccine stock, data on village health post, participation in Generasi (Waves II & III), direct observation regarding cleanliness.\n\nVillage midwives: Personal background, location of duty, condition of facility, time allocation, income, services provided, fee schedule (public and private), experiences during past\nthree deliveries, number of patients seen per service during the previous month, equipment and tools, medical supplies and stock, village health post management, participation in Generasi (Waves II & III), structure of subsidies received.\n\nPrimary school (Waves II & III), Junior secondary school: Principal background, principal time allocation, teacher roster, school facilities, teaching hours, enrollment records, attendance records, offi cial test scores, scholarships, fees, budget, participation in Generasi (Waves II&III), direct observation of classrooms, including random check on classroom attendance.\n\nVillage health post cadre (Waves II & III): Respondent characteristics, health post characteristics, service providers, cadre roster, tools and equipment, participation in Generasi."},"method":{"data_collection":{"data_collectors":[{"name":"University of Gadjah Mada","abbreviation":"","affiliation":""}],"sampling_procedure":"In order to evaluate the overall impact of Generasi, as well as to separately identify the impact of Generasi's performance incentives, Generasi locations were selected by lottery to form a randomized, controlled field experiment.\n\nThe Generasi randomization was conducted at the subdistrict (kecamatan) level, so that all villages within the subdistrict either received the same treatment of Generasi (treatment A or treatment B) or were in the control group. Randomizing at the subdistrict level is important since many health and education services, such as community health centers (puskesmas) and junior secondary schools, provide services to multiple villages within a subdistrict.\n\nThe Generasi locations were selected through the following procedure. First, 300 target subdistricts were identified, targeting poor, rural areas that had an existing community-driven development infrastructure. \n\nEach subdistrict was then randomly assigned by computer into one of three equal-sized groups: treatment A, incentivized (100 subdistricts); treatment B, non-incentivized (100 subdistricts); or control (100 subdistricts). Within a subdistrict, all villages received the same treatment. The randomization was stratified by district (kabupaten), to ensure a balanced randomization across the 20 different districts in the study.\n\nThe sampling design for the household component of the Generasi surveys was chosen to ensure adequate coverage in the key Generasi demographic groups: mothers who recently were pregnant or gave birth, children under age three, and children of school age. Within each village, one hamlet (dusun) was randomly selected, and a list of all households was obtained from the head of the hamlet. Five households were randomly sampled from that list to be interviewed. These households were stratified so that two selected households had at least one child under age two, two selected households had a child under age 15 but no children under age two, and one household had no children under age 15.","coll_mode":"Face-to-face [f2f]"}},"data_access":{"dataset_use":{"cit_req":"Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:\n- the identification of the primary investigator\n- the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation)\n- the survey reference number\n- the source and date of download.\n\nExample:\n\nSusan Wong, World Bank; Junko Onishi, World Bank; Ben Olken, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Indonesia. Indonesia - Impact Evaluation of PNPM Generasi Program (PNPM) 2009-2010, Third Wave. Ref. IDN_2009_PNPM_v01_M_v01_A_PUF. Dataset downloaded from [URL] on [date].","disclaimer":"The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses."}}},"schematype":"survey","tags":[{"tag":"DOI"}]}