{"doc_desc":{"title":"TZA_2015_DHS-MIS_v01_M","idno":"DDI_TZA_2015_DHS-MIS_v01_M_WB","producers":[{"name":"Development Data Group","abbreviation":"DECDG","affiliation":"The World Bank","role":"Documentation of the DDI"}],"version_statement":{"version":"Version 01 (December 2016). Metadata is excerpted from \"Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey 2015-2016\" Report."}},"study_desc":{"title_statement":{"idno":"TZA_2015_DHS-MIS_v01_M","title":"Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey 2015-2016","alt_title":"DHS-MIS 2015-16 \/ TDHS-MIS 2015-16"},"authoring_entity":[{"name":"National Bureau of Statistics (NBS)","affiliation":"Government of Tanzania"},{"name":"Office of the Chief Government Statistician (OCGS)","affiliation":"Zanzibar"}],"production_statement":{"producers":[{"name":"ICF International","affiliation":"Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program","role":"Technical assistance"},{"name":"Ministry of Health","affiliation":"Mainland","role":"Collaboration"},{"name":"Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children","affiliation":"Mainland","role":"Collaboration"},{"name":"Ministry of Health","affiliation":"Zanzibar","role":"Collaboration"}],"funding_agencies":[{"name":"Government of Tanzania","abbreviation":"GovTZA","role":"Funded the study"},{"name":"United States Agency for International Development","abbreviation":"USAID","role":"Funded the study"},{"name":"Global Affairs Canada","abbreviation":"DFATD","role":"Funded the study"},{"name":"Irish Aid","abbreviation":"Irish Aid","role":"Funded the study"},{"name":"United Nations Children\u2019s Fund","abbreviation":"UNICEF","role":"Funded the study"},{"name":"United Nations Population Fund","abbreviation":"UNFPA","role":"Funded the study"}]},"distribution_statement":{"contact":[{"name":"Information about The DHS Program","affiliation":"The DHS Program","email":"reports@DHSprogram.com","uri":"http:\/\/www.DHSprogram.com"},{"name":"General Inquiries","affiliation":"The DHS Program","email":"info@dhsprogram.com","uri":"http:\/\/www.DHSprogram.com"},{"name":"Data and Data Related Resources","affiliation":"The DHS Program","email":"archive@dhsprogram.com","uri":"http:\/\/www.DHSprogram.com"}]},"series_statement":{"series_name":"Demographic and Health Survey (Standard) - DHS VII","series_info":"The 2015-16 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS) is the ninth in a series of national sample surveys conducted in Tanzania to measure levels, patterns, and trends in demographic and health indicators. The first TDHS, conducted in 1991-92, was followed by the 1994 Tanzania Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Survey (TKAPS), the 1996 TDHS, the 1999 Tanzania Reproductive and Child Health Survey (TRCHS), the 2003-04 Tanzania HIV\/AIDS Indicator Survey (THIS), the 2004-05 TDHS, the 2007-08 Tanzania HIV\/AIDS and Malaria Indicator Survey (THMIS), and the 2010 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS 2010)."},"version_statement":{"version_notes":"Recode Data Alert (Version 7B)\nCorrections have been made to the Recode Data files. The changes implemented in the new version of the data are as follows:\n\nHousehold questionnaire:\t\nHV035: Selection for height and weight now based on Century Day Code instead of Century Month code.\nHV107: Highest year of education corrected\nHV108: Education in single years corrected\nHV109: Educational attainment corrected\nHV115: Current marital status for married and living together changed from 6 to 1\nHV123: Grade of education during current school year corrected\nHV124: Education in single years for current school year corrected\nHV213: Value set added for main floor material\nHV207A: Wealth index for urban\/rural corrected\nSHDIST: District number taken out\nSH124KU: Now combined into one variable SH124K\nSH124KN: Now combined in one variable SH124K\nSHIOD: Decimal point taken out of salt iodine level (now one implied decimal level)\nSH03: Relationship to household head taken out, since this is available from HV101\nSH17: Ever attended school added\nSH19: Attended school anytime during 2015 school year added\nSH20A: Level of school attended during 2015 school year added\nSH20B: Grade attended during 2015 school year added\nHC15: Not measured for height lying or standing now changed from not applicable to 0\nHML19: Person slept under an ever-treated net adjusted\nSB105: Weight in kilograms taken out, since this available from HC2\nSB106: Height in centimeters taken out, since this available from HC3\nSB112FW: Fieldworker number for anemia test added\nSB112BFW: Fieldworker number for malaria test added\nSB116: Hemoglobin result taken out since it is a filter\nSB119: Illness symptoms present taken out since it is a filter\nSB120: Hemoglobin result taken out since it is a filter\nSB126: Read consent for malaria information and treatment taken out since it is a filter\nSB205: Weight in kilograms taken out since it is available in HA2\nSB206: Height in centimeters taken out since it is available in HA3\nSB209: Marital status taken out since it is a filter\nSB209A: Relationship to household head taken out since it is a filter\nSB211FW: Fieldworker number adult respondent consent for anemia now assigned correctly\nSB218FW: Fieldworker number parental\/responsible adult consent for anemia added\nSB221: Eligibility for male interview and salt and iodine corrected\nSB222: Adult age taken out since it is a filter\nSB223: Marital status taken out since it is filter\nSB223A: Relationship to head of household taken out since it is a filter\nSB230: Hemoglobin level taken out since it is available in HA53\nSHA52AI: Result of iodine measurement added\nHMLA1: Person who slept under net 1 taken out since it is available in HMLA\nHMLA2: Person who slept under net 2 taken out since it is available in HMLB\nHMLA3: Person who slept under net 3 taken out since it is available in HMLC\nHMLA4: Person who slept under net 4 taken out since it is available in HMLD\nHV801: Time interview started changed to standard 24 hour clock\nHV802: Time interview ended changed to standard 24 hour clock\nHV803: Length of interview corrected and based on standard 24 hour clock\n\t\nWoman questionnaire:\t\t\nV019A: Number of calendar columns changed from 1 to 2\nV133: Education in single years adjusted\nV190A: Wealth index for rural\/urban corrected\nV191A: Wealth index scores for rural\/urban corrected\nV222: Period for Last birth to interview not based on Century Day Code instead of Century Month Code\nV304: Correction to knowledge any method for occurrences 10 and 17 (other traditional methods and other modern methods reversed)\nV307: Correction to method currently used for occurrences 10 and 17 (other traditional methods and other modern methods reversed)\nV327: Last source for users by type corrected\nV359: Last method discontinued in last 5 years corrected\nV380: Source knows for any method corrected\nM67: Period between discharge\/home delivery and health check for respondent corrected (now includes TBA premises)\nM68: Person who checked respondent health after discharge\/delivery corrected (now includes TBA premises)\nM69: Place where respondent check after discharge\/home delivery took place corrected (now includes TBA premises)\nM71: Time after home delivery and postnatal check corrected (now includes TBA premises)\nM72: Person who performed postnatal check corrected (now includes TBA premises)\nM73: Place where baby was checked for first time corrected (now includes TBA premises)\nM77: Child put on mother?s chest and bear skin corrected\nV463AB: Frequency smokes or uses other types of tobacco corrected\nV465: Number of cases for disposal of youngest child?s stools when not using toilet now based on Century Day Code instead of Century Month Code\nH32A-H32:\tDenominator for place where medical treatment or advice was sought for last episode of fever and\/or cough now restricted to H31B instead of H31 as in the standard recode\nV702: Husband\/partner?s highest year of education corrected\nV715: Husband\/partner?s total number of years of education corrected\nV729: Husband\/partner?s educational attainment corrected\nV801: Time interview started changed to standard 24 hour clock\nV802: Time interview ended changed to standard 24 hour clock\nV803: Length of interview corrected and based on standard 24 hour clock\nML13A-13Z: Number of cases now includes children with difficulty breathing (H32B = 1)\nD115J: Physical abuse by former partner added\nSHHV191: Wealth index factor score set to not applicable since this is available in V191\nS108A: Highest educational level taken out since this is available in V149\nS120: Used the internet in last 12 months taken out since this is available in V171A\nSV201-212: Taken out since these variables are available in the household file\nS646A: Denominator no longer restricted to children born in the last 5 years to match questionnaire\nS729: Brand name for condom used during last sex removed since this is available in V762A\nS410I, J, K, N: Prenatal care given by religious voluntary hospital, health center, dispensary and clinic added because this is combined in standard variable M57T\nS612I to N:\tSeek advice or treatment for diarrhea by several religious\/voluntary facilities added, because they are combined in H12U\nS625I to N:\tSeek advice or treatment for fever by several religious\/voluntary facilities added, because they are combined in H32U\nS630AA-AX: The number of cases for place received drugs for fever and cough expanded to include cough (H31B = 1).\n\t\nMan questionnaire:\t\t\nMV133: Education in single years adjusted\nMV190A: Wealth index for rural\/urban corrected\nMV191A: Wealth index scores for rural\/urban corrected\nMV304: Correction to knowledge any method for occurrences 10 and 17 (other traditional methods and other modern methods reversed)\nMV307: Correction to method currently used for occurrences 10 and 17 (other traditional methods and other modern methods reversed)\nMV3A00Y: Knows no source of family planning for non-users added\nMV3A00Z: Knows any source of family planning for non-users added\nMV801: Time interview started changed to standard 24 hour clock\nMV802: Time interview ended changed to standard 24 hour clock\nMV803: Length of interview corrected and based on standard 24 hour clock\nSM108A: Highest educational level taken out since this is available in MV149\nSM302A: Value set added to seen any information about family planning on poster"},"study_info":{"abstract":"The primary objective of the 2015-16 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS) is to provide up-to-date estimates of basic demographic and health indicators. This survey collected information on fertility levels, marriage, sexual activity, fertility preferences, awareness and use of family planning methods, breastfeeding practices, nutrition, childhood and maternal mortality, maternal and child health, malaria, and other health-related issues. In addition, the 2015-16 TDHS-MIS provided estimates of anaemia prevalence among children age 6-59 months and women age 15-49 years, estimates of malaria prevalence among children age 6-59 months, and estimates of iodine concentration in household salt and women\u2019s urine.\n\nThe information collected through the 2015-16 TDHS-MIS is intended to assist policy makers and programme managers in evaluating and designing programmes and strategies to improve the health of the country\u2019s population.","coll_dates":[{"start":"2015-08","end":"2016-02","cycle":""}],"nation":[{"name":"Tanzania","abbreviation":"TZA"}],"geog_coverage":"National","geog_unit":"Western Zone Northern Zone Central Zone Southern Highlands Zone Southern Zone South West Highlands Zone Lake Zone Eastern Zone Zanzibar","analysis_unit":"- Household\n- Children age 0-5\n- Women age 15-49\n- Men age 15-59","data_kind":"Sample survey data [ssd]","notes":"The 2015-16 Tanzania Demographic and Health and Malaria Indicator Survey covered the following topics:\n\nHOUSEHOLD\n\u2022 Identification\n\u2022 Background information on each person listed, such as relationship to head of the household, age, sex, highest educational attainment, and health insurance coverage\n\u2022 Characteristics of the household's dwelling unit, such as the source of water, type of toilet facilities, main source of energy for lighting, main source of fuel for cooking, materials used for the floor, roof and walls of the dwelling, ownership of land and livestock, and ownership of various durable goods (these items are used as proxy indicators of the household's socioeconomic status) \n\u2022 Mosquito nets\n\u2022 Inpatient health expenditures\n\u2022 Outpatient health expenditures\n\nINDIVIDUAL WOMAN\n\u2022 Identification\n\u2022 Respondent's background (age, education, etc.)\n\u2022 Reproduction\n\u2022 Contraception\n\u2022 Pregnancy and postnatal care\n\u2022 Child immunization\n\u2022 Child health and nutrition\n\u2022 Marriage and sexual activity\n\u2022 Fertility preferences\n\u2022 Husband's background and woman's work\n\u2022 Malaria\n\u2022 Other health issues\n\u2022 Female genital cutting\/mutilation\n\u2022 Maternal mortality\n\u2022 Domestic violence\n\nINDIVIDUAL MAN\n\u2022 Identification\n\u2022 Respondent's background (age, education etc.)\n\u2022 Reproduction\n\u2022 Contraception\n\u2022 Marriage and sexual activity\n\u2022 Fertility preferences\n\u2022 Employment and gender roles\n\u2022 Other health issues\n\u2022 Malaria\n\nBIOMARKER\n\u2022 Identification\n\u2022 Weight, height, hemoglobin measurement and malaria testing for children age 0-5 years\n\u2022 Weight and height measurement, hemoglobin and urine (for iodine) test for women age 15-49"},"method":{"data_collection":{"data_collectors":[{"name":"National Bureau of Statistics","abbreviation":"NBS","affiliation":"Government of Tanzania"}],"sampling_procedure":"Sample Design\nThe sample design for the 2015-16 TDHS-MIS was done in two stages and was intended to provide estimates for the entire country, for urban and rural areas in Tanzania Mainland, and for Zanzibar. For specific indicators such as contraceptive use, the sample design allowed the estimation of indicators for each of the 30 regions (25 regions from Tanzania Mainland and 5 regions from Zanzibar). The first stage involved selecting sample points (clusters), consisting of enumeration areas (EAs) delineated for the 2012 Tanzania Population and Housing Census. A total of 608 clusters were selected.\n\nIn the second stage, a systematic selection of households was involved. A complete households listing was carried out for all 608 selected clusters prior to the fieldwork. From the list, 22 households were then systematically selected from each cluster, yielding a representative probability sample of 13,376 households for the 2015-16 TDHS-MIS. To estimate geographic differentials for certain demographic indicators, Tanzania was divided into nine geographic zones. Although these zones are not official administrative areas, this classification system is also used by the Reproductive and Child Health Section of the MoHCDGEC. Grouping the regions into zones allowed a relatively large number of people in the denominator and a reduced sampling error. Note that the zones, defined below, differ slightly from the zones used in previous DHS surveys. Therefore, comparisons across the zones and from survey to survey should be made with caution. The zones are as follows:\nWestern Zone: Tabora, Kigoma\nNorthern Zone: Kilimanjaro, Tanga, Arusha\nCentral Zone: Dodoma, Singida, Manyara\nSouthern Highlands Zone: Iringa, Njombe, Ruvuma\nSouthern Zone: Lindi, Mtwara\nSouth West Highlands Zone: Mbeya, Rukwa, Katavi\nLake Zone: Kagera, Mwanza, Geita, Mara, Simiyu, Shinyanga\nEastern Zone: Dar es Salaam, Pwani, Morogoro\nZanzibar: Kaskazini Unguja, Kusini Unguja, Mjini Magharibi, Kaskazini Pemba, Kusini Pemba\n\nAll women age 15-49 who were either usual residents or visitors in the household on the night before the survey were included in the 2015-16 TDHS-MIS and were eligible to be interviewed. In a subsample of one-third of all the households selected for the survey, all men age 15-49 were eligible to be interviewed if they were either usual residents or visitors in the household on the night before the survey. In all households, with the parent's or guardian's consent, children age 6-59 months were tested for anaemia and malaria. All interviewed women were tested for anaemia. In the households selected for interviews with men, interviewed women were asked to provide a urine sample and a sample of household salt for laboratory testing to detect the presence of iodine.\n\nFor further details of sample design and implementation, see Appendix A of the final report.","coll_mode":"Face-to-face [f2f]","research_instrument":"Four questionnaires were used for the 2015-16 TDHS-MIS: the Household Questionnaire, the Woman\u2019s Questionnaire, the Man\u2019s Questionnaire, and the Biomarker Questionnaire. These questionnaires were based on the DHS Program\u2019s standard Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) questionnaires. They were adapted to reflect the population and health issues relevant to Tanzania. Inputs were solicited from various stakeholders representing government ministries, departments, and agencies; non-governmental organizations; and development partners. After the preparation of the definitive questionnaires in English, the questionnaires were translated into Kiswahili.","coll_situation":"Training of Field Staff\nThe main training of the 2015-16 TDHS-MIS enumerators, supervisors, and editors took place in Kilimanjaro region from July 20, 2015, to August 21, 2015. A total of 74 female nurses, 20 male nurses, 20 supervisors, and 20 editors from all over the country were invited to participate in the training. The training sessions were conducted by NBS, Office of the Chief Government Statistician (OCGS), and trainers from ministries responsible for health on both Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar with support from ICF International. Training on biomarkers was provided by trainers from Ifakara Health Institute (IHI) and Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre (TFNC), with support from ICF International.\n\nParticipants were evaluated through in-class exercises, quizzes, and observations made during field practice. By the end of the main training, 16 teams were formed, consisting of 16 individuals to serve as team leaders, 16 to serve as field editors, 16 as male interviewers, and 64 as female interviewers. All interviewers were nurses. The team leaders received additional training on how to identify the selected households, different subsamples, data quality control procedures, and fieldwork coordination. The field editors received additional training on how to edit the questionnaires, data quality control procedures, and how to enter data in tablets.\n\nFieldwork\nData collection was carried out by 16 field teams: three teams in Zanzibar and 13 teams on Tanzania Mainland. Each team was provided with a four-wheel drive vehicle with a driver. The teams consisted of a team supervisor, four female interviewers, one male interviewer, and one field editor, who also entered data into a tablet. The field editor and supervisor were responsible for reviewing all questionnaires for completeness, quality, and consistency before entering data into the tablet. All questionnaires, dried blood smears, table salt, and urine specimens were transferred to the NBS head office almost every 2 weeks by a quality control team from NBS, OCGS, TFNC, and ministries responsible for health for both Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar. The dried blood smears, table salt and urine specimens were sent later to IHI and TFNC laboratories for testing. The NBS also coordinated and supervised all fieldwork activities. ICF International provided technical assistance during the entire 5-month data collection period, from August 22, 2015, through February 14, 2016.","weight":"The final sampling weights are normalized in order to give the total number of unweighted cases equal to the total number of weighted cases at the national level, for both household weights and individual weights, respectively. The normalized weights are relative weights, which are valid for estimating means, proportions, and ratios, but are not valid for estimating population totals and for pooled data.\n\nSampling weights for the domestic violence surveys are calculated based on the number of eligible respondents in the households selected for the domestic violence module, for male and female surveys, respectively. A large number of sets of weights are calculated:\n- One set for all households selected for the survey\n- One set for women selected for the individual survey\n- One set for households selected for the male survey\n- One set for the male individual survey\n\nIt is important to note that the normalized weights are relative weights, which are valid for estimating means, proportions, and ratios, but not for estimating population totals and for pooled data. Also the number of weighted cases resulting from using the normalized weight has no direct relation to the survey precision because it is relative; especially for oversampled areas, the number of weighted cases will be much smaller than the number of unweighted cases, which are directly related to survey precision.","cleaning_operations":"In the 2015-16 TDHS-MIS the first data entry was done concurrently with data collection in the field. After the paper questionnaires were completed, edited, and checked by both the field editor and the supervisor, the data was entered into a tablet equipped with a data entry programme. This was done by the editor. Completed questionnaires were then sent to NBS headquarters, where they were entered for the second time and edited by data processing personnel who were given special training for this task. ICF International provided technical assistance during the entire data processing period.\n\nProcessing the data concurrently with data collection allowed for regular monitoring of team performance and data quality. Field check tables were generated regularly during data processing to check various data quality parameters. As a result, feedback was given on a regular basis, encouraging teams to continue in areas of good performance and to correct areas in need of improvement. Feedback was individually tailored to each team. Data entry, which included 100% double entry to minimise keying errors, and data editing, were completed on March 21, 2016. Data cleaning and finalization were completed on April 22, 2016."},"analysis_info":{"response_rate":"A total of 13,360 households were selected for the survey, of which 12,767 were occupied. Of the occupied households, 12,563 were successfully interviewed, yielding a response rate of 98%.\n\nIn the interviewed households, 13,634 eligible women were identified for individual interviews; interviews were completed with 13,266 women, yielding a response rate of 97%. In the subsample of households selected for the male survey, 3,822 eligible men were identified and 3,514 were successfully interviewed, yielding a response rate of 92%. There is little variation in household response rates between rural and urban residences.","sampling_error_estimates":"The estimates from a sample survey are affected by two types of errors: (1) nonsampling errors, and (2) sampling errors. Nonsampling errors are the results of mistakes made in implementing data collection and data processing, such as failure to locate and interview the correct household, misunderstanding the questions on the part of either the interviewer or the respondent, and data entry errors. Although numerous efforts were made during the implementation of the 2015 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS) to minimize this type of error, nonsampling errors are impossible to avoid and difficult to evaluate statistically.\n\nSampling errors, on the other hand, can be evaluated statistically. The sample of respondents selected in the 2015 TDHS is only one of many samples that could have been selected from the same population, using the same design and identical size. Each of these samples would yield results that differ somewhat from the results of the actual sample selected. Sampling errors are a measure of the variability between all possible samples. Although the degree of variability is not known exactly, it can be estimated from the survey results.\n\nA sampling error is usually measured in terms of the standard error for a particular statistic (mean, percentage, etc.), which is the square root of the variance. The standard error can be used to calculate confidence intervals within which the true value for the population can reasonably be assumed to fall. For example, for any given statistic calculated from a sample survey, the value of that statistic will fall within a range of plus or minus two times the standard error of that statistic in 95 percent of all possible samples of identical size and design.\n\nIf the sample of respondents had been selected as a simple random sample, it would have been possible to use straightforward formulas for calculating sampling errors. However, the 2015 TDHS sample is the result of a multi-stage stratified design, and, consequently, it was necessary to use more complex formulas. The computer software used to calculate sampling errors for the 2015 TDHS is a SAS program. This program used the Taylor linearization method for variance estimation for survey estimates that are means or proportions. The Jackknife repeated replication method was used for variance estimation of more complex statistics such as fertility and mortality rates.\n\nThe Taylor linearization method treats any percentage or average as a ratio estimate, r = y\/x, where y represents the total sample value for variable y, and x represents the total number of cases in the group or subgroup under consideration.\n\nFor further details on sampling error calculations see Appendix B of the final report.","data_appraisal":"Data quality tables were produced to review the quality of the data:\n- Household age distribution\n- Age distribution of eligible and interviewed women\n- Age distribution of eligible and interviewed men\n- Completeness of reporting\n- Births by calendar years\n- Reporting of age at death in days\n- Reporting of age at death in months\n\nNote: The tables are presented in Appendix C of the final report."}},"data_access":{"dataset_availability":{"access_place":"The DHS Program","access_place_uri":"http:\/\/dhsprogram.com\/data\/available-datasets.cfm","original_archive":"The DHS Program\nhttp:\/\/dhsprogram.com\/data\/available-datasets.cfm\nCost: None"},"dataset_use":{"contact":[{"name":"The DHS Program","affiliation":"","email":"archive@dhsprogram.com","uri":"http:\/\/www.DHSprogram.com"}],"cit_req":"Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:\n- the Identification of the Primary Investigator\n- the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation)\n- the survey reference number\n- the source and date of download","conditions":"Request Dataset Access\nThe following applies to DHS, MIS, AIS and SPA survey datasets (Surveys, GPS, and HIV). \nTo request dataset access, you must first be a registered user of the website. You must then create a new research project request. The request must include a project title and a description of the analysis you propose to perform with the data. \n\nThe requested data should only be used for the purpose of the research or study. To request the same or different data for another purpose, a new research project request should be submitted. The DHS Program will normally review all data requests within 24 hours (Monday - Friday) and provide notification if access has been granted or additional project information is needed before access can be granted. \n\nDATASET ACCESS APPROVAL PROCESS\nAccess to DHS, MIS, AIS and SPA survey datasets (Surveys, HIV, and GPS) is requested and granted by country. This means that when approved, full access is granted to all unrestricted survey datasets for that country. Access to HIV and GIS datasets requires an online acknowledgment of the conditions of use.\n\nRequired Information\nA dataset request must include contact information, a research project title, and a description of the analysis you propose to perform with the data.\n\nRestricted Datasets\nA few datasets are restricted and these are noted. Access to restricted datasets is requested online as with other datasets. An additional consent form is required for some datasets, and the form will be emailed to you upon authorization of your account. For other restricted surveys, permission must be granted by the appropriate implementing organizations, before The DHS Program can grant access. You will be emailed the information for contacting the implementing organizations. A few restricted surveys are authorized directly within The DHS Program, upon receipt of an email request. \n\nWhen The DHS Program receives authorization from the appropriate organizations, the user will be contacted, and the datasets made available by secure FTP. \n\nGPS\/HIV Datasets\/Other Biomarkers\nBecause of the sensitive nature of GPS, HIV and other biomarkers datasets, permission to access these datasets requires that you accept a Terms of Use Statement. After selecting GPS\/HIV\/Other Biomarkers datasets, the user is presented with a consent form which should be signed electronically by entering the password for the user's account.\n\nDataset Terms of Use\nOnce downloaded, the datasets must not be passed on to other researchers without the written consent of The DHS Program. All reports and publications based on the requested data must be sent to The DHS Program Data Archive in a Portable Document Format (pdf) or a printed hard copy. \n\nDownload Datasets\nDatasets are made available for download by survey. You will be presented with a list of surveys for which you have been granted dataset access. After selecting a survey, a list of all available datasets for that survey will be displayed, including all survey, GPS, and HIV data files. However, only data types for which you have been granted access will be accessible. To download, simply click on the files that you wish to download and a \"File Download\" prompt will guide you through the remaining steps.","disclaimer":"The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses."}}},"schematype":"survey","tags":[{"tag":"noDOI"}]}